- Render a record-keyed status view for managed profiles\n- Refuse shared Settings links before actor controls mount\n- Localize intentional unavailable states
An owner can now narrow a grant to the parts of their record they mean to
share, and can offer the third level. Both decisions are made once, on the
invitation, and neither widens afterwards.
The invite schema takes `scope`: absent or null is the entire record, which
is what every stored grant means and what an owner who does not narrow still
gets. An empty array, a key outside the vocabulary and the whole-record
sentinel are each refused with a 422 naming the field; `inviteGrant` refuses
the same three underneath, and its `invalid_scope` now has an HTTP mapping
instead of falling into the generic refusal.
Offering MANAGE asks for a fresh second factor when the account has one. That
gate resolves through the session cookie and has no Bearer fall-through, so a
token caller is refused first with `sharing.invite.manage_browser_only` rather
than being told it is not authenticated by a route that had just
authenticated it. The consequence is deliberate: management of a health
record is offered from a browser.
The account payload gains `sections` and `level` beside `access` and
`canWrite`, resolved server-side and ordered as the consent screen reads.
`access` was `grant.access === "WRITE" ? "write" : "read"`, which would have
published a grant that can delete entries as read-only; it is a total map
now, so the next level cannot ship silent. The capabilities hook carries both
facts and turns neither into an affordance yet — the edit and delete controls
come back in the release where the routes behind them answer.
The consent surface asks two questions in order rather than laying out a
nineteen-cell grid. The level is three radios, narrowest preselected. What
they can open is two radios, the entire record preselected, and only the
narrow branch expands the eight sections with a sentence each. Both honest
limits are stated above the checkboxes, where the decision is being made: a
section shares everything written in it, and the cross-record surfaces do not
appear for a narrowed grant. Documents carries its own warning, cycle appears
only for an owner who tracks it, and Manage collapses the question to the one
line that answers it.
The Manage sentence says the other person can add, change and remove entries,
including ones the owner entered themselves, and says in the same breath what
it does not reach. The acceptance side gets its own responsibility line rather
than the write one wearing a stronger adjective.
Six locales.
Seven findings from the adversarial pass before v1.36.1 was tagged. One
blocking defect shipped in that release; these did not, and they are all places
where somebody looking after another person's health record meets a wall with
no explanation, or where a guard cannot fail.
The document vault was the largest. `/documents` is marked as a shared
destination, so the shell offers it under a switch, and every read behind it
resolved the caller instead of the record: the vault painted a query-error card
and the illness view painted another beside it. That is the same failure the
release describes as fixed on the dashboard. Five GET arms move to the record
resolver now, and only the GET arms: the list, one document, its file, its
thumbnail and the vault's usage payload, which the filter bar is built from.
Uploading, retyping, deleting, linking a document to an illness and every AI
verb stay with the owner, and the two reads that spend decryption CPU key
their quota on the person calling rather than the record, the rule
`medications/compliance` already follows.
Logging a value on a metric you track yourself leaves the admitted set. It was
admitted, named on the consent screen in six languages, and unreachable: the
only form that posts one sits on a page a shared record does not open, and the
component that renders it says so in its own comment while returning null. It
is the third route the rule that withdrew allergies and family history fitted
exactly, and it was applied to two of the three. Reading those values stays.
Two guards could not fail, and both were proved by mutation before and after.
The prefetch guard checked rule three with two regexes: one was satisfied by
the doc comment every page carries, the other missed an aliased import, and
the pair stayed green with the dashboard genuinely prefetching off the
switch-blind session. It reads the AST now, resolves aliases through the
module's own import table, and pins the five prefetching pages by name so a
page that stops being detected is loud. The activity verb map decided
membership on a literal `requireRecordAuth("write")`, so putting the argument
on its own line, which is what the formatter does the moment the call grows,
dropped a route out of the scan and turned a genuinely-red run green. Both
counts are of matches now rather than of files walked.
The rest are single instances of rules applied everywhere else. "Take all due"
was withheld on a note saying it rides the bulk intake route; it does not, and
its own docblock says why not, so a helper with five morning tablets tapped
five times for nothing. Marking a dose skipped is offered wherever marking it
taken is. A form could be opened in the frame before the app knew whose record
was on screen and then stood there once the answer arrived, on the capture
sheet and on the dashboard's quick-entry sheets. Two more copies of the intake
toast were still building their own, one of them with an Undo pointing at a
route no delegate may call. The customise link on the mood page led to a page
that exists to say it is not part of what was shared. And the access-level
radios on the invitation screen are hidden by design with no focus ring on
their label, so keyboard focus moved invisibly across the one screen where
somebody grants write access to their record.
Three new structural guards, each watched fail first: the customise link sits
inside a capability branch on every surface a delegate can reach, every intake
surface confirms through the one shared decision, and the batch sweep is
offered at the level that admits it.
Found by an adversarial pass over the release candidate before it was tagged,
and it is the reason the tag waited.
`POST /api/medications/intake` is admitted for delegates because a caregiver
standing next to the patient has to be able to say the tablet went down. It is
an update, though, and the same body can carry two other things. Snoozing
writes `snoozedUntil` on the OWNER's medication row, and the reminder cron
skips that medication for as long as the stamp is in the future. The field
takes any future instant. So somebody with write access could stop another
person's medication reminders for years, and three things made it quiet: the
owner is deliberately not notified of a delegated snooze, the activity feed
renders the whole family as "marked a dose", and the only accurate trace was a
line in the admin audit log.
The second was flipping a dose the owner had already recorded — taken to
skipped and back, which rewrites their compliance history and refunds
inventory. The consent screen promises that changing what is already there
stays with the owner.
Both refuse for a delegate now and stay open to the owner, who is the only
person either was ever for. A refused attempt is filed under the owner and gets
its own sentence in the activity panel rather than borrowing the one for
marking a dose, because folding them together is what made the gap dangerous.
Two more from the same pass:
The consent notice named allergies among the things a delegate may add. That
left the admitted set before this release shipped, and it said so in six
languages on the one screen where somebody decides who may write into their
health record. It also omitted half of what IS admitted. The copy now matches
the frozen list, and the test asserts the withdrawal rather than only the
presence of the rest.
The banner told a WRITE delegate nothing at all — the mode line rendered only
in the read case, guarded by a comment stating that write grants did not exist
yet. This is the release that made them exist. It matters that the banner say
it, because the rule that a refused control is absent rather than disabled
rests on the banner naming the mode globally.
And a third instance of the substitution this release already fixed twice: the
BMI chart divided the owner's weights by the height of whoever was looking.
Inside a shared record it draws nothing now rather than a number belonging to
two different people.
The activity view told an owner that a delegate acted on their record. With
delegated writing it can say which act: added a reading, recorded a lab result,
marked a dose. The mapping already existed as a pure module with its own test
and a fallback for anything unmapped; this is the wire it was missing.
The invitation form gains the choice, and the option labels say what actually
ships rather than the word "write": a delegate can add readings, results,
observations, a medication and a marked dose, and can edit or delete nothing,
including what they entered a moment ago. That gap between what "write access"
sounds like and what it does is where a support case lives, so it is on the
card rather than in a reply.
The delegate reads the same thing before they accept. A pending write
invitation states its level and one sentence about what accepting means, on the
screen where they accept it, because acceptance is where the two consents meet
and it happens once.
Ending an access says what stays: the entries remain and the owner can remove
any of them, and the activity view keeps saying who entered what for as long as
the instance's audit window reaches. That number comes from the server, so an
instance running ninety days says ninety, and a browser that has not been told
says nothing rather than a made-up year.
The browser journey now invites at the wider level and reads the posted body
for it. That is the only check in the tree that can: the component convention
is server-rendered only, so no test under src/ runs the form's submit path, and
every one of them stays green with the control wired to a constant.
The invite route has accepted expiresAt, stored it and annotated on it since
the grant model shipped. The card sent a hardcoded null, so the column existed,
the validator accepted it, the wide event reported on it, and no person could
set one. The release note said an invitation could carry a lapse date.
The form now offers the date, floored at tomorrow because a grant that lapses
today confers nothing. A chosen day maps to the END of that day in the
browser's own zone, so "until the 30th" means the 30th rather than the
midnight that starts it, which is the reading anybody picking a date has in
mind. Empty stays the default and still means no lapse date.
Both ends are pinned rather than one: the control is asserted in the rendered
form, and the mapping is exported so its contract holds without a click, which
is this repository's convention for component tests.
Each behaviour here was verified by removing the code that provides it and
confirming the test went red, then putting it back. Two of them did not, and
both were rewritten rather than kept:
The restore-side persister check asserted that the delegate's own dashboard
could not be read back inside a shared record. Deleting the guard left it
green, because the record-scoped hash already makes a snapshot written in one
record unreadable in another. It now counts what landed in the cache, so the
guard it names is the thing it measures — and the weaker line is kept beside
it with a note saying why.
The switcher's account rows were asserted from server-rendered markup. Radix
portals do not render server-side at all, so an earlier draft was measuring
the renderer. Those rows moved to the browser suite; what stays here is the
gate, which fails sharply — with the `canSwitch` bail removed the two cases do
not return different markup, they throw.
Two more shapes worth naming. The cache dimension is exercised through a real
QueryClient built from the app's own defaults, because "the hash string
changed" and "one record's data cannot be read while inside another" are
different claims. And the invalidation is a plain function over a client with
three live entries seeded, with a test that asserts they start valid — without
it, a client that failed to seed and one where everything was invalidated look
the same from every other assertion.
Settings gains one section for one concept: who else can open this health
record, whose this account may open, and when they were opened. Split across
two pages it would be two half-answers.
An invitation confers nothing until the other person accepts it, and the card
says so above the field rather than after the submit — that is the part
somebody needs to know before they type a name. Refusals are named from the
stable errorCode, because "no account with that name" and "that person already
has access" are different situations with different next steps.
Ended grants stay in the list. The row is the consent record, and "who had
access, from when to when, and who ended it" is the question the panel exists
to answer; a list that dropped them could not. Revoking asks once and then does
it: reducing access must never be harder than granting it was.
`GET /api/account/activity` answers the owner's other question. One row per
person per day with a count, not one per request — a hundred identical lines
is a way of answering nothing. The window is published with the rows rather
than assumed: audit history is purged on a schedule the operator sets, so the
view prints the number the server resolved from the same setting the purge job
reads. An instance running ninety days says ninety.
Six locales ship with it.
iOS green-lit removal on 2026-07-30 (their decoder treats both as
optional, confirmed at ShareLinkDTO.swift:105-106) and confirmed no
shipped build breaks. Drops RETIRED_FHIR_SCOPE_FIELDS and its spread
from the create and list responses, removes the two properties and
their required-list entries from ShareLinkCreated/ShareLinkList in
the OpenAPI source, and regenerates the spec. The request side was
already closed off by .strict() in an earlier pass; this finishes it
on the response side.
Route tests now assert the fields are absent from both responses
instead of asserting the constants they used to carry.
Save moves out of the header and into its own row at the bottom right,
where every other settings card that saves a form puts it. The body
starts on the title's reading edge instead of the card edge, so the text
lines up with the cards above and below it.
The rules between the rows are gone; the gap between groups does the
grouping. Every row said 'Being recorded - Shown in the app' under the
pillar name, which is the modules screen's business and was the same two
words on every line - the sentence at the top of the card already says
it once. The paragraph explaining that heart, glucose and cholesterol
are three pillars in one area is gone too.
The area headings read in the content colour now rather than the muted
one, so they stop looking switched off beside the rows they head.
It could never score. The schema records VO2max but cannot tell a
measured test apart from a device estimate, so every fitness row reached
the scorer unproven and was refused - the pillar has never produced a
value on any account. Listing it on the score settings page as a thing
you can choose, with a line admitting it does nothing, was chrome over a
switch that changed no number.
So it leaves the catalogue: no pillar id, no domain, no scorer, no row,
no wire field. A stored selection that still names it reads back fine -
the resolver has always filtered stored ids against the catalogue and
drops what it no longer knows, so nobody's saved recipe throws or is
discarded over it.
That also fixes the page claiming unsaved changes forever. The save
stripped the fitness pillar out of the selection on its way to the
server, so the answer that came back could never match the form that
sent it, and 'All pillars' left the save button lit no matter how often
you pressed it.
The new page wrote its own success toast. The outcome module owns that
affordance so a saved thing looks the same everywhere, and a structural check
catches anyone reaching around it. That check offers an allowlist entry as a
way out; taking it would have left two places deciding what a success looks
like, which is the thing the module exists to prevent.
The composite's coverage counts distinct areas of health, not pillars.
The learning line called them pillars, so an account recording blood
pressure, glycaemia and cholesterol read that it had one eligible pillar
while three sat in front of it. The count was right and stays; the noun
was wrong.
The meter beneath the score carried the same confusion further. Its
fraction is the three-area minimum the score requires, and a score only
exists once that floor is met, so it rendered as full coverage for every
account that has one. The arithmetic is untouched. Below the floor the
fraction is a real number and is shown as one; at or above it, the floor
is stated. The dots and the percentage were always honest, they track how
much history is behind the number, and they stay.
Both are held down by an AST guard rather than a text search, with a
counter-test for the neighbouring lines that are legitimately about
pillars and legitimately about a real fraction.
A dedicated settings page lists every scorable pillar grouped by the area
of health it speaks to, so the fact that blood pressure, glycaemia and
lipids are three pillars of one area is visible rather than buried. Each
row shows the three things that were never separable before: whether the
pillar is being recorded, whether it is shown, and whether it counts
toward the score. Only the last is writable here, and the page says so.
A pillar whose tracking is switched off is not listed at all, because it
is not waiting for anything. A pillar this build cannot score yet is
listed, disabled, and says why. Wellbeing under safety signposting is
named as safety guidance and never as a mistake in the selection. The
refusal for a selection too narrow to produce a score comes from the
server and is shown in the reader's own language.
The score's foot disclosure gains one link into the page.
The admin panel offered a toggle for the Health-Score explainer and
described it as the ? next to the delta line. That ? had already been
taken off the insights surface a release earlier, and the caption that
replaced it went away entirely when the health score was replaced by
the reference composite. Since then an operator could turn the switch
off, get a saved confirmation, and change absolutely nothing.
The toggle, its wording in all six languages, its place in the flag
matrix the app and the iOS client both read, and its column on
app_settings are all gone. Nothing is left to promise a control that
does not exist.
A guard goes in with it: every remaining assistant sub-flag has to be
read by some surface, and the panel and the plumbing that carry all of
them by construction do not count as proof.
The baseline step submitted what you filled in and ignored the answer.
The profile write is field-independent: it stores everything that
validated and reports back what it declined. Nobody read that report
here, so a value the server refused vanished between the input and the
next screen and you moved on believing it was saved.
It now says which field did not make it, using the name that sits next
to the input you typed into, and keeps going with the rest that did
save. When nothing could be saved at all, the step stays put and names
the field that blocked it instead of a shrug. The wording and the
field-naming come from the same place the account form in Settings
uses, so the same refusal reads the same wherever you hit it.
The Settings > Account save handler read json.error straight off the
wire and rendered it as-is - the exact path a raw validator message
would have reached a person's screen through, and the only place the
report's symptom actually reproduces (baseline-form already goes
through the errorCode-aware localizedApiError helper).
It now resolves meta.errorCode into a localized sentence, the same
convention used everywhere else in the app, and never touches the
top-level string. A partial save (some fields landed, one didn't)
gets its own message naming the rejected field via the same label
already shown next to that input on this form, and reseeds the
form from what the server actually persisted so a field that was
silently skipped can't read as saved.
describeRejectedProfileField lives in account-section-utils so both
the warning and the failure path share one field-name-to-label
mapping instead of duplicating it.
The card carried a four-sentence non-medical notice at the top of the cycle
on-ramp. It goes, at the maintainer's decision.
The goal-specific caveat on the prediction surface is untouched: a profile set to
avoid pregnancy still gets the stronger "not a contraceptive method" copy, which
is chosen server-side by goal and shared with the native client, so nothing about
that path changes here.
Removes the key from all six locales and the now-unused icon import.
- require password, passkey, TOTP and WebAuthn proof choices
- order fresh-factor completion before challenge creation
- keep successful enrollment in one cookie-bound ceremony
- Remove the user-facing private-host bypass contract
- Require redacted operator approval guidance for legacy failures
- Preserve usable public and approved-private connected states
Six integration cards and the lab-OCR dialog keyed their tone off `res.ok`.
A sync that imported nothing because every reading was refused rendered a
green tick and a count, and a re-scan in which every confirmed row turned out
to be a duplicate raised a green toast saying zero readings were saved.
Each surface now renders the outcome the route resolved: a tick only when
everything landed, a warning when some of it did not, an error when none of
it did, and a neutral note when there was nothing new. The lab-OCR toast
picks its variant the same way.
Replaces the directory-scoped import guard with one that covers the whole
component tree and pins per-file occurrence counts, so a listed file cannot
quietly add a second tick. Its docstring states what it cannot catch.
The rule that a write which wrote nothing must not read as a success was
scoped to the import panel. Provider syncs need the same rule, so the
classifier moves to src/lib/outcome/written-outcome.ts and the tick plus the
success colour move to one presentation component the whole tree renders
through. Adds the sync shape: a run reports what it imported and whether any
part of it failed, and the outcome is resolved from both.
BMI renders on the native dashboard and was configurable from nowhere.
Two individually-correct decisions produced it: `bmi` is a catalogue id
with no web render path, and the web layout editor filters those out
because a toggle over something this page cannot draw would be a silent
no-op. The widgets PUT accepts and persists them all the same, and the
native client writes them, so an account ended up holding rows it never
set and could not change from any surface.
The sortable list stays exactly as it was. Below it, the ids the web
does not draw but the layout carries get their own labelled group with
the same two flags and no reordering — placement belongs to the client
that draws them. An account with no native client has nothing there and
sees nothing. The module gate applies as it does above, fail-open.
Refs #581
The batch route has accepted a `syncTrigger` since v1.32.8 and put it on the
wide event, where no human reads it. Half of what was promised got built: the
value is written and appears in three places in the codebase, none of which is
a screen anyone looks at.
Persist it on the account, alongside the instant of the most recent batch that
arrived without the app being opened, and publish both from
`GET /api/integrations/healthkit`. The card now names how the last sync arrived
and when data last came in on its own. `healthKitLastSyncedAt` alone reads
identically whether the phone delivers by itself or only while someone has the
app open, which is why "is background delivery working" could not be settled
from either side.
A batch that declares no trigger writes null rather than leaving the previous
one standing — the field describes this sync, and an older client's silence is
not evidence about it. A foreground batch leaves the background timestamp
alone; overwriting it would erase the only answer the card has.
Also here: WHOOP, Fitbit and Google Health join the workout-freshness table.
All three write workouts, and without an entry their cards could report every
measurement type fresh while the workout leg had been silent for weeks. And the
status pill drops a generic `aria-label` that replaced its own accessible name,
so a screen reader announced the same words for a healthy connection as for a
broken one.
`failing_leg` was one slot, so two legs of the same provider failing in
overlapping windows overwrote each other. The row remembered whichever failed
last, and that leg recovering then cleared an error the other one was still
causing — the ledger forgot a live failure and painted the card green over it.
The slot becomes a set. A failure adds its leg, a success removes its own, and
the error state, the per-kind buckets and the streak anchor clear only once the
set is empty. The array is ordered oldest failure first, so the last element is
the leg that wrote the message `last_error` holds; when that leg recovers while
others are still failing, the message is cleared rather than left describing a
leg that is now healthy.
An unattributed failure adds nothing and removes nothing. A single-leg provider
therefore behaves exactly as before, and a multi-leg provider no longer loses
what its other legs already reported.
The column never reached a client — it is absent from the status serialiser and
from the OpenAPI contract — so it is replaced rather than shimmed.
Names LiteLLM, OpenRouter and vLLM, states what it does not share with
the OpenAI provider and why, and keeps the Local provider's own section
intact — it still speaks the same wire and remains the right pick for a
model on your own machine.
Marc-André Bombeck