- keep shared navigation independent of actor module preferences\n- open scoped records at their first allowed destination\n- announce record access and kind in doorway names
- prove profile uses a read-only shared route\n- cover scoped navigation independent of actor module flags\n- require action, access, and kind in record button names
- Render a record-keyed status view for managed profiles\n- Refuse shared Settings links before actor controls mount\n- Localize intentional unavailable states
An owner can now narrow a grant to the parts of their record they mean to
share, and can offer the third level. Both decisions are made once, on the
invitation, and neither widens afterwards.
The invite schema takes `scope`: absent or null is the entire record, which
is what every stored grant means and what an owner who does not narrow still
gets. An empty array, a key outside the vocabulary and the whole-record
sentinel are each refused with a 422 naming the field; `inviteGrant` refuses
the same three underneath, and its `invalid_scope` now has an HTTP mapping
instead of falling into the generic refusal.
Offering MANAGE asks for a fresh second factor when the account has one. That
gate resolves through the session cookie and has no Bearer fall-through, so a
token caller is refused first with `sharing.invite.manage_browser_only` rather
than being told it is not authenticated by a route that had just
authenticated it. The consequence is deliberate: management of a health
record is offered from a browser.
The account payload gains `sections` and `level` beside `access` and
`canWrite`, resolved server-side and ordered as the consent screen reads.
`access` was `grant.access === "WRITE" ? "write" : "read"`, which would have
published a grant that can delete entries as read-only; it is a total map
now, so the next level cannot ship silent. The capabilities hook carries both
facts and turns neither into an affordance yet — the edit and delete controls
come back in the release where the routes behind them answer.
The consent surface asks two questions in order rather than laying out a
nineteen-cell grid. The level is three radios, narrowest preselected. What
they can open is two radios, the entire record preselected, and only the
narrow branch expands the eight sections with a sentence each. Both honest
limits are stated above the checkboxes, where the decision is being made: a
section shares everything written in it, and the cross-record surfaces do not
appear for a narrowed grant. Documents carries its own warning, cycle appears
only for an owner who tracks it, and Manage collapses the question to the one
line that answers it.
The Manage sentence says the other person can add, change and remove entries,
including ones the owner entered themselves, and says in the same breath what
it does not reach. The acceptance side gets its own responsibility line rather
than the write one wearing a stronger adjective.
Six locales.
Seven findings from the adversarial pass before v1.36.1 was tagged. One
blocking defect shipped in that release; these did not, and they are all places
where somebody looking after another person's health record meets a wall with
no explanation, or where a guard cannot fail.
The document vault was the largest. `/documents` is marked as a shared
destination, so the shell offers it under a switch, and every read behind it
resolved the caller instead of the record: the vault painted a query-error card
and the illness view painted another beside it. That is the same failure the
release describes as fixed on the dashboard. Five GET arms move to the record
resolver now, and only the GET arms: the list, one document, its file, its
thumbnail and the vault's usage payload, which the filter bar is built from.
Uploading, retyping, deleting, linking a document to an illness and every AI
verb stay with the owner, and the two reads that spend decryption CPU key
their quota on the person calling rather than the record, the rule
`medications/compliance` already follows.
Logging a value on a metric you track yourself leaves the admitted set. It was
admitted, named on the consent screen in six languages, and unreachable: the
only form that posts one sits on a page a shared record does not open, and the
component that renders it says so in its own comment while returning null. It
is the third route the rule that withdrew allergies and family history fitted
exactly, and it was applied to two of the three. Reading those values stays.
Two guards could not fail, and both were proved by mutation before and after.
The prefetch guard checked rule three with two regexes: one was satisfied by
the doc comment every page carries, the other missed an aliased import, and
the pair stayed green with the dashboard genuinely prefetching off the
switch-blind session. It reads the AST now, resolves aliases through the
module's own import table, and pins the five prefetching pages by name so a
page that stops being detected is loud. The activity verb map decided
membership on a literal `requireRecordAuth("write")`, so putting the argument
on its own line, which is what the formatter does the moment the call grows,
dropped a route out of the scan and turned a genuinely-red run green. Both
counts are of matches now rather than of files walked.
The rest are single instances of rules applied everywhere else. "Take all due"
was withheld on a note saying it rides the bulk intake route; it does not, and
its own docblock says why not, so a helper with five morning tablets tapped
five times for nothing. Marking a dose skipped is offered wherever marking it
taken is. A form could be opened in the frame before the app knew whose record
was on screen and then stood there once the answer arrived, on the capture
sheet and on the dashboard's quick-entry sheets. Two more copies of the intake
toast were still building their own, one of them with an Undo pointing at a
route no delegate may call. The customise link on the mood page led to a page
that exists to say it is not part of what was shared. And the access-level
radios on the invitation screen are hidden by design with no focus ring on
their label, so keyboard focus moved invisibly across the one screen where
somebody grants write access to their record.
Three new structural guards, each watched fail first: the customise link sits
inside a capability branch on every surface a delegate can reach, every intake
surface confirms through the one shared decision, and the batch sweep is
offered at the level that admits it.
Found by an adversarial pass over the release candidate before it was tagged,
and it is the reason the tag waited.
`POST /api/medications/intake` is admitted for delegates because a caregiver
standing next to the patient has to be able to say the tablet went down. It is
an update, though, and the same body can carry two other things. Snoozing
writes `snoozedUntil` on the OWNER's medication row, and the reminder cron
skips that medication for as long as the stamp is in the future. The field
takes any future instant. So somebody with write access could stop another
person's medication reminders for years, and three things made it quiet: the
owner is deliberately not notified of a delegated snooze, the activity feed
renders the whole family as "marked a dose", and the only accurate trace was a
line in the admin audit log.
The second was flipping a dose the owner had already recorded — taken to
skipped and back, which rewrites their compliance history and refunds
inventory. The consent screen promises that changing what is already there
stays with the owner.
Both refuse for a delegate now and stay open to the owner, who is the only
person either was ever for. A refused attempt is filed under the owner and gets
its own sentence in the activity panel rather than borrowing the one for
marking a dose, because folding them together is what made the gap dangerous.
Two more from the same pass:
The consent notice named allergies among the things a delegate may add. That
left the admitted set before this release shipped, and it said so in six
languages on the one screen where somebody decides who may write into their
health record. It also omitted half of what IS admitted. The copy now matches
the frozen list, and the test asserts the withdrawal rather than only the
presence of the rest.
The banner told a WRITE delegate nothing at all — the mode line rendered only
in the read case, guarded by a comment stating that write grants did not exist
yet. This is the release that made them exist. It matters that the banner say
it, because the rule that a refused control is absent rather than disabled
rests on the banner naming the mode globally.
And a third instance of the substitution this release already fixed twice: the
BMI chart divided the owner's weights by the height of whoever was looking.
Inside a shared record it draws nothing now rather than a number belonging to
two different people.
MedicationSideEffect was classified as backed up and was not carried: the
export wrote nothing and the restore had nothing to read, so a restored
account kept the drug and lost the reason someone may have stopped taking it.
Delegated write access sharpens that — a side effect is one of the things a
second person can contribute, and it was the contribution a restore dropped.
The rows ride inside their medication, like the schedules beside them. A
top-level array would have to carry `medicationId` and survive a restore that
mints a fresh id for a portable file, which is the remap the intake events
already work around by drug name; a nested create has no id to remap, because
Prisma binds the child to whatever id the parent row actually got.
The note follows the measurement contract for the same dual-column
arrangement: a portable export carries the decrypted note and no ciphertext, a
disaster-recovery payload carries the ciphertext verbatim, and the restore
re-encrypts a legacy plaintext row rather than writing plaintext back into the
column.
Move the model from COVERAGE_PENDING to TWO_ENDED_MODELS, and settle the claim
where a written verdict cannot: the round trip seeds a side effect, exports
through the real builder, empties the account and reads the row back out of
the real restore route with its category, entry, severity and note intact.
Both halves were excised to check the test can fail — the restore branch turns
the count red, the payload turns the field values red.
The dose-history purge was the one destructive verb in the intake family
that removed rows outright. Both siblings, the single-event DELETE and the
bulk delete, stamp `deletedAt` and bump `syncVersion`; the purge called
`deleteMany`, so a mis-tap was final and a client offline at purge time kept
every row forever, because a row that no longer exists produces no tombstone
for the sync feed to carry. It tombstones now, scoped to live rows so a
second purge counts zero. No inventory refund: a purge wipes a history as
bookkeeping, and refunding every dose ever taken would inflate the current
container count instead.
The manual water quick-add and the lab-result un-delete both wrote health
data and reached only the wide event, which expires. Months later nothing
could answer who put a day's total there or who brought a reading back, and
with a second person able to act on a shared record that question has a
second possible answer. Both write a durable row now, named after the
neighbours they sit beside.
The refused-delegation audit comment claimed the row was written for the
owner's benefit. It is not: it is filed under the caller, it is only written
for a header refusal, and a header names an account the caller merely
asserts. Filing under that claim would let anyone write rows into any
account's activity feed by naming it. The comment says what the row is now,
and points at `recordDelegatedAccess`, which is the half the owner does see.
Two comments in the biomarker surfaces still claimed the `SetNull` foreign
key left the readings behind when a marker is deleted. That stopped being
true when delete became a "drop this and its history" action and the
confirmation copy was rewritten in six locales to say so.
The purge route gains a call-shape assertion rather than a count assertion,
because a count comes back identical from a `deleteMany`. The lab restore
route had no test at all and now has one.
Three surfaces record a dose and all three had to reach the same two
conclusions inside somebody else's record: name the record, and drop an
Undo the server refuses. Two learned it and the dose ledger did not,
because the ternary was written out three times. It is written once now,
in the file the other two already share, with its own test.
POST /api/allergies and POST /api/family-history leave the frozen
delegable write set. The argument that admitted them still stands — an
allergy is the single most useful thing a caregiver can contribute — but
the only surface that posts to either lives in Settings, which a switch
closes, so no delegate could reach the form at any level. That is a
permission frozen ahead of the caller for it, and the list is built the
other way round on purpose.
Both delegable READ arms stay. A caregiver reading the allergy list is
what the feature is for; only the contribute step waits, and it comes
back in the same diff as the surface that offers it.
Three of the newly gated surfaces are query-backed, so the suite gains a
query client and a cache seed rather than a hook mock: the component
under test stays the real one. Each leg asserts the rail, the card and
the reminder row are still THERE — only the mutating control is gone.
Breaking each gate in turn puts every leg red.
Nine surfaces offered a delegate an action the server declines, and the
switch had never been asked about any of them.
The Today rail's dismiss and the coach check-in's keep / let-go write
through routes that resolve the caller, so both refuse under a switch;
they now ask canManage and are absent at either grant level. A priority
action with no href and no handler is no longer rendered as an inert
button at all — the type carries that rule now.
The Vorsorge dashboard card offered the mark-done that /checkups already
withholds, and the checkups list branch inlined its own ungated copy of
the button the cards branch gates, so which view a browser last chose
decided whether the action appeared. Both bind canManage.
The chart overlay cog persists through a route that resolves the caller
and stores a preference belonging to the person rather than the record.
Gated once in the control so the three chart wrappers cannot drift.
Three query parameters opened sheets past a gated button: ?add=<TYPE> on
measurements, ?new=1 on medications, and ?edit=1 on a medication detail,
the last of which opens a wizard refused at both levels. A deep link is
the same affordance as the control that produces it.
The efficacy retarget dial rewrites a setting the owner chose. The
episode documents card offered a link and an upload the vault gates on
the same endpoint throughout. And the dose ledger built its own success
toast, missing both the Undo suppression and the "saved to" receipt its
two siblings already carry — the one a delegate met on every dose.
The Coach drawer is not mounted inside a shared record, so every button
calling askCoach() opened nothing. The launch provider now publishes no
value there and each entry point's existing null check does the rest;
the documents sheet, the one that rendered without checking, now checks.
A server-prefetching page dehydrates a health record into the HTML and
seeds it into the client's query cache under the key the client cell
reads. That copy is only right when the account the page read is the
account the client's route would answer with, and under an account
switch it never is: `getSession()` answers who is CALLING, deliberately
and permanently, so all five prefetching pages seeded the delegate's own
rows into a document opened on somebody else's record. The dashboard was
the worst of it — snapshot, digest and widget layout ride routes that
refuse the refetch, so the delegate's numbers stayed on the owner's
dashboard, while the chart row refetched to the owner and left the page
showing two people at once under a banner naming one.
Resolve the session through `getUnswitchedSession()` instead, which
answers null while the browser is acting on another record. The prefetch
steps aside and every cell fetches through its route, which is where the
grant check lives. Resolving the owner here instead was the other
candidate and is worse: the grant check has exactly one home, half of
what these pages prefetch rides routes that declared themselves not
delegable, and re-deriving it in an RSC would be a second program
deciding whose record this is.
Close the two shell-level doors beside it. The Coach launcher, its
drawer mount and the module tour hang off `<AuthShell>` rather than off a
route, so dropping Insights and Coach from the navigation under a switch
left them painting on every page in the record and on the unavailable
panel too — one tap from a drawer whose every action refuses, and a
`POST /api/insights/coach/seen` fired by opening it at all. All three
bind `useRecordCapabilities()`, the same resolved grant the banner and
the switcher read. Absent, not disabled.
The prefetch rule is structural: the guard walks the app tree, so a sixth
prefetching page is covered the moment it lands rather than the moment
somebody remembers. The pages stay on the session-surface allowlist with
their reasons rewritten, because a wrapper one directory deeper is the
easiest way for a surface to walk out of a guard.
The activity view told an owner that a delegate acted on their record. With
delegated writing it can say which act: added a reading, recorded a lab result,
marked a dose. The mapping already existed as a pure module with its own test
and a fallback for anything unmapped; this is the wire it was missing.
Sharing lived in a settings panel and a menu three levels deep. That is where
a grant is managed and not where it is used: somebody who opens this app every
morning to check on a parent does not go through settings to do it, and the
design standards draw the same line, settings being account utilities rather
than feature destinations. So the dashboard carries one compact card listing
the records shared with this account, each row a one-tap switch through the
existing flow.
It is a doorway and not a preview. No numbers, no last reading. A slice of
somebody else's record on the delegate's own dashboard would sit outside the
one frame the design leans on, the banner naming the record you are inside.
An account nobody has shared with sees nothing at all.
The other half is the receipt: a reading, a lab result or a dose recorded
under a switch now says which record it landed in, because "Saved" alone is
the confirmation somebody acting for another person does not need. The undo
on the dose toast goes at the same time, since a delegate cannot remove what
they recorded and an undo they can see is one the server refuses.
Also here: the lines the owner's activity view owes each admitted verb, as a
translated mapping with a fallback, so a later release filing a verb it has
never heard of still renders a sentence rather than a blank row.
Marking a dose taken or skipped is the verb the delegation was written for:
somebody looking after a parent confirms the morning tablet. Adding a
medication and noting a side effect come with it. The card menu keeps only
what survives and disappears entirely when nothing does.
Four detail tabs leave the registry inside somebody else's record, because
their whole content is owner work: the schedule editor and its plan history,
the supply ledger, the external-token row, and the advanced surface holding
the wizard, the import and the destructive zone. A stale deep link into one
lands on the landing tab, the way an inapplicable tab already does.
The take-all-due sweep goes too. It rides the bulk intake route, which the
delegation does not name, and a control that half-works is worse than one
that is not offered.
Every page a switch can reach now renders the controls the grant covers and
none of the others. Readings, lab results and illness entries keep their add
path at WRITE and lose edit, delete and selection at both levels. Mood,
screeners, cycle days, checkup reminders and the document vault lose every
mutation control at both levels, because no grant admits those verbs and the
routes behind them refuse a switched session outright.
Absent, not disabled, throughout. The banner already says whose record this
is, so no chip repeats it beside each missing button; the one exception is
the measurements empty state, where somebody who may add will look for the
edit control beside the row they just entered, and one muted line says where
the limit is.
Two dead ends went with them: the custom-metric section on the measurements
page linked every row into a route the shell turns a delegate away from, and
the wrench glyphs point at settings pages sharing does not cover.
Three controls carry most of the app's mutation surface between them. The row
delete is spelled once for measurements, lab results, biomarkers, allergies,
family history, custom metrics and medication supply; the selection bar is
the only bulk delete; the capture picker is the fastest path to four entry
forms on a phone and bypasses every page header.
Deleting belongs to the owner at every grant level, so the first two are
absent inside somebody else's record rather than greyed out: a disabled bin
still claims the row is the delegate's to remove. The picker keeps the two
kinds a delegation admits and drops a mood entry and a glass of water, which
the server refuses under a switch; when nothing survives, the bar's plus
button goes with them instead of opening an empty sheet.
The invitation form gains the choice, and the option labels say what actually
ships rather than the word "write": a delegate can add readings, results,
observations, a medication and a marked dose, and can edit or delete nothing,
including what they entered a moment ago. That gap between what "write access"
sounds like and what it does is where a support case lives, so it is on the
card rather than in a reply.
The delegate reads the same thing before they accept. A pending write
invitation states its level and one sentence about what accepting means, on the
screen where they accept it, because acceptance is where the two consents meet
and it happens once.
Ending an access says what stays: the entries remain and the owner can remove
any of them, and the activity view keeps saying who entered what for as long as
the instance's audit window reaches. That number comes from the server, so an
instance running ninety days says ninety, and a browser that has not been told
says nothing rather than a made-up year.
The browser journey now invites at the wider level and reads the posted body
for it. That is the only check in the tree that can: the component convention
is server-rendered only, so no test under src/ runs the form's submit path, and
every one of them stays green with the control wired to a constant.
The invite route has accepted expiresAt, stored it and annotated on it since
the grant model shipped. The card sent a hardcoded null, so the column existed,
the validator accepted it, the wide event reported on it, and no person could
set one. The release note said an invitation could carry a lapse date.
The form now offers the date, floored at tomorrow because a grant that lapses
today confers nothing. A chosen day maps to the END of that day in the
browser's own zone, so "until the 30th" means the 30th rather than the
midnight that starts it, which is the reading anybody picking a date has in
mind. Empty stays the default and still means no lapse date.
Both ends are pinned rather than one: the control is asserted in the rendered
form, and the mapping is exported so its contract holds without a click, which
is this repository's convention for component tests.
A dashboard chart card called itself an h3. Nothing contained it. The cards
beside it in the same grid — "Recent unlocks", "Recent workouts" — are h2,
and so are the target and usual-range cards on the metric subpages, so the
chart card was both the odd one out and a level skipped straight from the
page h1. The rendered dashboard ladder was h1 → h3 → h3 → h3 → h2 → h2, and
/insights/bmi was h1 → h3 → h2.
A heading level is a claim about nesting. Someone moving through the page by
headings hears a subsection announced where there is no section, and screen
reader rotors build their outline from exactly this. Promoting the title
keeps the same text, the same classes and the same pixels; only the claim
changes.
The unit guard fails in the fast run; the browser scan catches the same
regression through axe, but only in the e2e job.
Several accessibility scans ran against a page that had not finished
arriving, so axe reported violations the app does not have. The worst of
them was the medications case, which waited for a level-one heading and
then checked that a level-one heading exists. A page that really lost its
heading would have waited out the timeout under a misleading name instead
of failing the rule, which makes it a check that cannot fail rather than a
flaky one.
The filter rail was the other bad sentinel. It renders beside the loading
silhouettes rather than after them, so it was on screen while the rows were
still grey rectangles. Under an 8x CPU throttle the rail and the loading
marker resolved in the same 40ms poll and the rows a poll later.
Every case now gates on a marker the real component carries in its
resolved, non-empty branch, and on a component other than the one the scan
asserts. Both the desktop table and the mobile card list carry the same
marker so the wait holds at any viewport. No sentinel names a heading, the
app frame, a busy marker or the filter rail any more.
The strip is new this release and had not been checked against the
design standards. It carried the shape §11 names as the anti-pattern: a
centred flex-wrap row whose gap-y drops the action onto its own line
once the name is long enough. The maintainership strip is the sibling
that already had an action and already had the right shape, so the two
now read the same — sentence on min-w-0 flex-1, way out on shrink-0,
beside it rather than under it.
The exit control was a 32px tap target. Leaving somebody else's record
on a phone is the one interaction in the whole banner stack, and it now
carries the standard's floor (min-h-11 sm:min-h-9).
The three strips also spell their icon size three ways for identical
CSS; they all use size-3.5 now.
Text tiers are unchanged and were already right: the person's name is
foreground because it is content, the read-only qualifier is muted
because it is meta.
The offline, shared-record, demo and maintainership strips lived inside
the content column, so each one pushed the top bar down while the
sidebar's logo band stayed at the top of the window. Both bands read
SHELL_HEADER_BAND and are therefore the same height with the same
border, and the single line they draw across the top of the app still
came apart: measured on the French maintainership strip, the two borders
sat 66.5px apart at 768px and 61.0px apart at 1280px, and the full
three-banner stack put them 184.5px apart. After the hoist the step is
0.00px at every depth and both widths.
A banner is a statement about the whole window, not about the content
column, so it belongs above the row. The outer wrapper keeps the h-dvh
and the row below takes what the banners leave, which means the stack
comes out of the viewport budget instead of being added on top of it:
the document still does not scroll at any depth, and <main> stays the
one vertical scroller at both breakpoints.
The existing seam guard could not see this class. It asserts that both
bands carry the shared band tokens, which stayed true the whole time,
and the e2e spec beside it measures a shell with nothing above the
header. The new spec forces the banners on through the conditions the
components actually read — an unmaintained locale, a patched account
payload, a real offline context — and measures the same two borders at
four stack depths. Reverting the layout change turns it red on the first
banner with the measured offset in the message, while the older seam
spec stays green.
The maintainership strip gains a data-slot so the shell's chrome can be
enumerated from one attribute.
git, eslint and vitest each carry an exclusion for local development
worktrees, and all three name /.worktrees/ while the convention actually in
use is /.wt-*/. Every one of them was therefore walking eleven full copies of
the source tree.
The consequences differed by tool and none of them announced itself. pnpm lint
took ten minutes instead of one and reported warnings from whatever commits
those copies happened to sit on. vitest collected duplicate suites that drag in
a second React instance, which fails in ways that have nothing to do with the
working tree. git left them merely untracked, one git add -A away from
committing the repository eleven times over.
With the true warning count finally visible, teach no-unused-vars the
underscore convention this codebase already follows and drop the five
disable directives that convention made redundant. pnpm lint is clean.
A non-underscore unused argument still warns; that was checked rather than
assumed.
Two browser contexts, two seeded accounts, one database: the owner invites,
the delegate accepts and opens the record, the owner takes it back. Every step
through the shipped UI, because the half of this feature that can go wrong is
the half a person touches.
The stale-paint check is a negative one and deliberately not "the new record's
data arrives" — a check that waits for the new data says nothing about what
was on screen while it arrived. An init script arms a MutationObserver before
any page script on every navigation, including the reload the switch performs,
and latches the delegate's own marker weight. The observer's positive control
runs first on a page that definitely shows it, so its later silence is not the
silence of a broken observer.
Then it was broken on purpose, and the result is written into the spec rather
than assumed. Removing the switch-time cache wipe, the persister's restore
guard and the record-scoped hash — all three — leaves the spec GREEN: the
restore already refuses to clobber a query the live cache holds, and the
dashboard's query is created during render, so the snapshot never reaches that
route's screen at all. Removing the reload turns it red on the banner rather
than on the marker. So this suite is a regression net over the journey, not a
proof of any one control; the controls are proven where they can be broken and
observed, in the unit suites, and the spec's header says so.
The nav assertion turned up a real gap while it was failing: the avatar block
still linked into the account settings from inside a shared record. Those
routes refuse under a switch, so the link led only to an explanation of why it
did not work. It renders as a plain identity block now, and the mobile user
menu drops the same utilities.
Setup gains a second account, a marker weight in each record, a grant reset,
and a clear of the login bucket — this setup signs in twice now, and the
ceiling is five attempts a quarter-hour, so three local runs used to end with a
429 from the fixture rather than a failure from the product.
Each behaviour here was verified by removing the code that provides it and
confirming the test went red, then putting it back. Two of them did not, and
both were rewritten rather than kept:
The restore-side persister check asserted that the delegate's own dashboard
could not be read back inside a shared record. Deleting the guard left it
green, because the record-scoped hash already makes a snapshot written in one
record unreadable in another. It now counts what landed in the cache, so the
guard it names is the thing it measures — and the weaker line is kept beside
it with a note saying why.
The switcher's account rows were asserted from server-rendered markup. Radix
portals do not render server-side at all, so an earlier draft was measuring
the renderer. Those rows moved to the browser suite; what stays here is the
gate, which fails sharply — with the `canSwitch` bail removed the two cases do
not return different markup, they throw.
Two more shapes worth naming. The cache dimension is exercised through a real
QueryClient built from the app's own defaults, because "the hash string
changed" and "one record's data cannot be read while inside another" are
different claims. And the invalidation is a plain function over a client with
three live entries seeded, with a test that asserts they start valid — without
it, a client that failed to seed and one where everything was invalidated look
the same from every other assertion.
Settings gains one section for one concept: who else can open this health
record, whose this account may open, and when they were opened. Split across
two pages it would be two half-answers.
An invitation confers nothing until the other person accepts it, and the card
says so above the field rather than after the submit — that is the part
somebody needs to know before they type a name. Refusals are named from the
stable errorCode, because "no account with that name" and "that person already
has access" are different situations with different next steps.
Ended grants stay in the list. The row is the consent record, and "who had
access, from when to when, and who ended it" is the question the panel exists
to answer; a list that dropped them could not. Revoking asks once and then does
it: reducing access must never be harder than granting it was.
`GET /api/account/activity` answers the owner's other question. One row per
person per day with a count, not one per request — a hundred identical lines
is a way of answering nothing. The window is published with the rows rather
than assumed: audit history is purged on a schedule the operator sets, so the
view prints the number the server resolved from the same setting the purge job
reads. An instance running ninety days says ninety.
Six locales ship with it.
Switching is three acts in a fixed order, and the order is the safety
argument. Ask the server, so a refused switch leaves the browser where it was.
Empty the caches a reload cannot reach, awaited rather than fired, because a
wipe racing the navigation is a wipe that sometimes does not happen. Then
reload the document, which is what discards the in-memory cache, the rendered
React trees, and every request already in flight against the old record.
The banner is the feature, not decoration. Someone who forgets they are
switched will log their own blood pressure into another person's record, and
there is no undo for a reading that was never theirs. So it states whose
record is open, that it is read-only, and carries the way out — in the one
visual register reserved for "something about this screen is not normal", at
the top of the shell above every other strip. A subtle tint is what people
stop seeing on the third switch.
The switcher lives in one component mounted in both user menus. A way in on
the laptop and no way out on the phone is how the two menus have drifted
before.
Nav entries that sharing does not cover drop out, and a page reached by
bookmark says so instead of painting a row of refusals. Both are paint: the
server refuses those routes on its own, from a frozen list this code cannot
reach. Settings, connected services, notifications and the AI surfaces are the
account around a record rather than the record itself.
A grant can end while a browser is inside the record. Revocation clears the
delegate's sessions in the same transaction; expiry does not, and leaves a
session stamped with an account it may no longer act on — correct refusals
under a screen that lies. One cache subscriber notices the stable errorCode
and leaves, rather than asking two hundred call sites to remember.
Marc-André Bombeck