The front door reads the same ledger every screen reads: a record that
never entered the flow sees the welcome, one mid-way is sent to the step
it owes, a finished one is offered the questions again. The shell prints
the counter and an ordered step list off the step machine, so it shows
exactly the screens this flow has, and every screen moves focus to its
heading on arrival.
"Skip for now" is a real exit — it stamps the account past the first-run
redirect and opens the checklist on the dashboard — and the one-time
medical disclaimer now gates it as well as "Set up", because a skip that
reached the dashboard without it would be a way round the acknowledgment.
The five-step wizard's welcome carousel, goal picker and source grid go
with it; the numbered step route follows in the next commit.
Which screen is next, where a returning person resumes, whether a URL
may be visited, and what the counter says are all one function of the
published ledger and answers, so the page guard, the screens and the
shell cannot disagree. Q6 is in the order only while an area needs a
unit and the account does not already answer it; the first-result task
follows the spec's fixed priority (a connection the browser can finish,
then the first medication for a daily schedule, then one reading for
the first area) and is left out for a record somebody else will run,
because the three tasks write the caller's own record.
Tested before the screens exist; the two rules a screen would most
easily get wrong were broken on purpose and the tests went red.
The needs-based onboarding has no read of its own — its state rides
GET /api/auth/me — but every screen that persists an answer, the confirm
screen, the disclaimer acknowledgment and the Settings restart card are
mutations, and the queryKey-factory rule allows no bare key at a call
site. One module names them, and one read-back key for the reading the
first-result step logs, under the measurements prefix so a later write
evicts it.
Two cases in the integration file answered one or two questions and posted
the confirm, which the gate now refuses; they answer or pass all six. The
audit assertion reads the details column as the JSON string it is.
Four of them. The confirm re-stamped its completion instant on every call, so
a replay quietly moved the moment the setup finished at while the derivation
beside it was carefully latched. The two list answers were stored exactly as
sent, duplicates included, so the column could hold something the reader would
never return — the reader de-duplicates on the way out and now so does the
write. The wide-event name for saving an answer used a different noun from its
two siblings, which makes a dashboard filter awkward for one feature. And the
contract said the restart body was required while the route accepts none.
Three things, all in the same pair. The reader that orders the list from the
answers shipped without the proof that it reads correctly: every existing case
took the early return, so `checklistOrderFromNeeds` and the two new arms were
never executed by a test. They are covered now — medication first for somebody
who takes one daily, the named connection ahead of the untouched rows, profile
always first, and no answer combination that drops or duplicates a row.
A first-result task that was offered and then passed left the setup reading as
permanently unfinished, because the check asked only whether the offered task
had produced anything. A deliberate pass is an answer. And the published state
is additive — every record carries the field — so nine pending steps and empty
answers must read as "never entered the flow" rather than as an unfinished
one, or every account that predates the flow would look half set up.
The list itself now follows the design: for a record that ran the flow it goes
when its rows are done or the person hides it, and the five-reading rule stays
only for records that never entered.
The account payload resolved the setup state for the actor while its module
map, its cycle flag and every count the checklist reads beside it answer for
the active record. A guardian looking at a child's dashboard therefore got the
child's rows ordered by their own answers, and the child's reading count
tested against their own flow state. The two halves of that component have to
agree about whose record they describe, so the field is record-scoped now,
like the module map next to it.
Under a grant narrowed to one section the answers come back empty, for the
reason the module map is masked: they name the domains the record tracks, and
a grant that opens readings does not open that. The shape of the flow still
comes through.
The three write routes stay actor-only and say why: a delegable declaration is
a reviewed entry in the sharing surface guard, and a read that is wider than
its write is the honest shape while that entry is still to come.
The setup flow writes a record's module map, its glucose unit and its unit
preference. All three have a dedicated settings route that records an audit
row, and the flow recorded none, so "why did my modules change" had no answer
in the activity panel. Restarting the flow did write a row, which made the gap
look like an oversight rather than a decision, because it was one.
Same event names as the dedicated routes, since it is the same column and the
panel should group them. The module row names the keys that actually moved and
the domains kept for their content.
The guardian's modules route and the setup flow's confirm both decide a
record's modules, and each had its own copy of what that means: write the
preference blob, write the delegated cycle column, invalidate the health
score. Two copies of a three-step write drift, and the second one was added by
this branch. They share one function now, keyed on the record, which is the
carrier the managed-profile work needs.
Authentication stays at the routes and stays different on purpose — the
guardian route acts on a managed record, the setup routes refuse outright
under a switch until a guardian's route into a record's setup lands with the
rest of that record's configuration. So does the merge: what the answers imply
and what somebody just ticked are different questions about what may be
overwritten. The actor's own modules route keeps its own write, because that
one is guarded on a concurrency token the record-keyed callers do not carry.
The derivation wrote an explicit off for every module the answers did not
name, which is right for a record being set up and wrong for one with years of
rows behind it. An established self-hoster has, for most modules, no stored
preference at all — they were default-on and nobody ever touched the toggle —
so the first confirm took away the navigation entry, the dashboard widget and
the settings entry for domains full of content. The rows survived; the
surfaces did not.
A derived off now asks first, and only for the modules it would actually
retract. Ownership is not re-answered: the measurement domains come from the
same map the MCP reads and the coach snapshot gates off, and each remaining
module names the one table its content lives in, exhaustively, so a module
added later fails to compile until somebody says where its content is. A
module whose domain holds rows keeps whatever the record already had, because
absence is what "on" looks like in the stored map.
The only gate on the derivation was Q1 being set, so one answer was enough to
turn the whole questionnaire into a module map. Two ways that landed wrong and
they compound. Somebody answers who the record is for, closes the tab, and
later finishes the legacy four-step wizard, which posts to this same endpoint
and knows nothing about these questions: the five unanswered ones each read as
their conservative default, eleven surfaces are written off, and the
once-only marker makes it unrepeatable. Or any client patches one answer and
posts the confirm straight back.
The gate now asks whether every question has an answer or a deliberate pass.
A half-answered flow derives nothing, is not stamped complete, and keeps its
confirm step pending, so finishing the questions later still does the work.
The legacy arm is untouched: a caller with no setup row still answers the
fixed acknowledgement it always did.
The spec's sixth question is skipped when the account already carries the
preferences, and the flow had no way to know: `User.unitPreference` is
nullable with null meaning "default metric", and the account payload coerces
that away, so nothing downstream could tell a chosen metric from an unset
column. The two columns are read raw on the server now, into the same
vocabulary the wire publishes, and a record whose account holds both reads its
`units` step as done — the question answers itself and is never put again.
Read-side only: the stored ledger keeps saying pending, because the person
really has not answered it, and an answer given later still lands.
The two writes the units answer makes — the display columns and the record of
the answer — go in one transaction, so a failure between them can no longer
leave the columns changed with no record of what changed them.
Four claims the unit suite cannot reach, because each is about what is in the
database afterwards: the answers persist and a replay writes nothing new, the
module derivation happens once and leaves a later Settings change alone, a
restart resets the steps and not the modules, and a delegate with a live
accepted grant and a switched session is refused on all three writes — with
neither record acquiring a row, which is the quiet failure a fall-back to the
caller's own record would produce.
The demo guard gains the three paths and, beside them, the case that matters
more: admitting one verb on a path must not open a sibling.
Nothing recomputes an answer. The module map they produced survives on the
account row, but the map says what is switched on, not that the person told the
flow they take medication daily and have a visit next month — so a restore
without the row opens a blank questionnaire for somebody who already answered
it, and leaves the checklist ordering itself from nothing.
Both ends live in one file, the arrangement the visits and the score already
use, because a reader who greps only the restore route gets a false negative
when the route delegates.
`modulesDerivedAt` is the field that makes this more than history and it is
asserted rather than defaulted: it is the once-only latch on the module
derivation, so a restore that let it default to null would hand the next confirm
permission to re-apply the questionnaire over every module decision taken since,
silently. The round trip seeds it non-null and reads it back.
The file's schema validates the three answer objects loosely and the restore
narrows them through the same fail-soft readers the account payload uses. Being
stricter there would refuse a whole account's restore over one retired chip.
The wipe takes the row for the reason the reset already takes the wizard's own
columns: the record the answers were about is gone, so the answers describe
nothing.
Additive: `onboarding` carries the nine steps with their status, the answers as
given, the flow's own completion stamp and the one task it offered. Always
present — a record that never entered the flow reads as empty answers with nine
pending steps, so a client branches on the statuses rather than on whether the
field exists, and an unknown step id is skipped rather than refused.
It is resolved for the CALLER's own record rather than for the active one,
unlike the two module fields beside it. The three write routes are actor-only,
and publishing a setup state the browser cannot write would be a read it could
act on and never complete.
Both ends land here, because a field with no reader is the failure this
repository keeps rediscovering. The getting-started checklist orders its rows
from the answers — medication first for somebody who takes one daily, the
data-source row first for somebody who named a wearable — and it stays on screen
while the flow is unfinished. That is the second half: five readings were never
evidence that the setup finished, and now a pending step, an unconfirmed set of
answers or an offered task that produced nothing keeps the list where it is.
The ordering only applies once the answers are confirmed. Re-ordering the
dashboard under somebody who is still mid-question would be movement they did
not ask for.
Three writes, all on the caller's own record.
`PATCH /api/onboarding/answers` saves one step the moment it is answered, so
leaving the flow and coming back resumes where it stopped. It is idempotent
because the whole computation is a pure function of the row and the body,
including the first-result instant, which is kept rather than re-taken. There is
no ordering contract at all: a back button has to work.
`POST /api/onboarding/complete` keeps everything it did and gains the confirm
screen's job. For a record that answered the questions it derives the module map
once and applies it, and the once-only latch is the point: a second confirm
would re-apply a questionnaire over decisions taken in Settings since. Cycle is
switched on through its own column and never off, because the gate already
derives an unanswered cycle from recorded sex and an untick is not a request to
retract that.
`POST /api/onboarding/restart` puts the steps back and clears the latch. It
writes no module state whatever: a re-run never turns off something switched on
by hand, and the safest way to hold that is for this route to have no opinion
about modules at all. It also leaves the first-run redirect's own stamp alone,
so asking the questions again does not push anybody back through the old wizard.
All three refuse outright while the session is acting on somebody else's record,
at every grant level, so a delegate can never write another record's setup. The
route into a managed profile's flow belongs with the rest of that record's
configuration and is not smuggled in here.
The demo allowlist gains the three: the flow has to be completable there with
preset answers, and none of them creates health data.
The setup questionnaire the design spec asks for needs somewhere to put its
answers. `OnboardingRecord` is that place: one row per RECORD rather than per
person, so a guardian running a managed profile's setup writes the child's row
and not their own, and the three JSON columns hold the answers, the nine
ordered steps with their status, and the one task the flow ends on.
Nothing here is encrypted, and the schema comment says why: the columns hold
closed enum vocabularies, not free text, which is the same class of value as
the module map and the goal slugs sitting in plaintext beside them.
The needs to modules map lives next to the module keys rather than in the flow,
because a module renamed or retired has to break the map at compile time rather
than leave a chip that quietly changes nothing. The derivation is total — every
directly-owned key gets an explicit value — and the merge beside it is
one-directional: what the answers name is switched on, what they do not name is
switched off only where the record does not already carry a deliberate on. The
two delegated keys are absent by construction: `cycle` is reported separately
because its real column is on the cycle profile, and the Coach is not offered by
this flow at all.
Readers are fail-soft. They sit on the payload that rides every app boot, and a
value written by a release that named an area this one retired must not take the
shell down with it.
Nothing is retired: the four-step wizard, its goal slugs and the one-time tile
seed keep working and keep their meaning until the new surface replaces them.
The two states are disjoint — the slugs decide tile order, these answers decide
which modules are on, and neither reads the other.
Four smaller things around the same card.
The configured flag came from the environment of whichever process serves the
request. A hand-rolled split that gives BACKUP_S3_* to the worker and not to
the web process would have shown an operator "nothing leaves this host" over a
ledger full of fresh rows. The ledger is queried either way now, and a row in
it outranks an environment read: a row is proof an upload happened.
Rows sorted by username put the one account that needs attention wherever the
alphabet leaves it, which on a hundred-account cohort is the crowd problem the
card exists to end, moved from a count into a list. Worst verdict first,
alphabetical within a verdict, decided server-side so the tests and the
accessibility fixture see the order the operator does.
The card's docblock claimed the worker holds PutObject and GetObject. The
runbook is right and the multipart path needs AbortMultipartUpload too, so the
prose no longer documents a grant that would break the uploader.
And the byte formatter moved to lib. The off-host card was importing it out of
a thousand-line client component, which costs nothing while both cards render
on one route and becomes a cost the moment either moves.
The badge read the enabled flag plus a DSN that parses. Neither says anything
about the target accepting a report: a wrong public key, a wrong project id and
a host that stopped answering all parse, and every one of them showed green
with a line naming the host. That is the false reassurance an operator finds
out about when they go looking for a crash that was never reported.
Nothing in the tree recorded an outcome, so there was nothing to read. The
sender now stamps one next to the DSN it used — instant on a success, a short
classification on a failure. Never the response body: that is text from a
remote host and has no business in this database or on this page.
The badge is green only while a report has left inside the last fortnight,
amber while a target is set and nothing has come back, and it names the reason
underneath. The clock lives with the ledger, so the verdict is resolved in the
route and the card paints what it is handed. A failure that a later success
superseded is not shown at all. Pressing Test records like any other send, so
the button proves the target on demand.
On the release that adds the ledger the table is empty, so on a host that has
been uploading nightly for months every account read Never, under a sentence
saying no copy had ever reached the bucket. That sentence is untrue on exactly
the morning an operator opens the new card for the first time, and it is a
claim the host cannot make: what is empty is the record, not the bucket.
The run now records every account it walks, not only the ones an object came
of. A walk that produced nothing moves the attempt instant and leaves the
success columns alone, so the two cases separate: no row at all is no record
yet, a row without a success is never. Never now means what the word says —
a run looked at this account and has never put anything there.
The card names the last check on the never row, so the state is a fact with a
timestamp rather than an assertion. Runbook and all seven bundles carry the
same two sentences. The integration file proves both arms against real
Postgres, including that a failed run leaves the previous good copy on the
row.
The threshold was the schedule period with no budget on top of it. Two things
spend that budget on a host where nothing is wrong. The cron runs 02:30
Europe/Berlin, so on the DST fall-back Sunday the gap between two runs is 25
hours and every account on every host would cross one period on the same
morning. And the ledger instant is when that account's object landed, by
design, so on a cohort walked one account at a time an account reached an hour
later tonight than last night drifts past 24 with two clean runs behind it.
The schedule period and the verdict threshold are now separate numbers. The
period is still what the card quotes; the threshold is the period plus six
hours, applied to both steps, so due still means one run produced nothing and
stale still means two. The fall-back night is pinned in the unit file by its
real dates rather than by an arithmetic 25, and a genuinely missed night at 31
hours still reads due. The runbook says why the slack is there.
The column was INTEGER. A single object may occupy 8 MiB across 10 000
multipart parts, which is the 80 GB the uploader explicitly permits, and
Postgres INTEGER stops at 2.1 GB. An account between the two uploads fine and
then cannot be recorded, so the biggest account on the host is the one the
console would have to report on and could not.
BIGINT in the table, BigInt in the model, Number() where the route builds the
wire row so the payload type stays a plain number. The migration is edited in
place rather than followed by a second one: the table has not shipped, and a
column widened before its first release is one column, not a history.
The comparison with the in-database backup does not carry over, for the
record: that size is octet_length over a bytea Postgres caps at 1 GB, while
this object never touches the database at all.
The per-account ledger row shared the upload's try. A pool timeout or a
connection reset on that upsert landed in the same catch as a refused upload:
the account was counted as failed, its reason pushed into the run's failure
list, and the console would go on to read never or stale for an account whose
encrypted copy was sitting in the bucket the whole time. That is the same
inversion the ledger was added to remove, on the write side.
The upload's boundary now ends where the object is durable. uploadEncryptedBackup
resolves only after the multipart completes, so the count and the largest-object
figure are taken there, and the row is written afterwards under its own boundary.
A write that fails warns with the account it belongs to and adds a run-level
count, which is a different fact from a failed upload and reads as one.
Two arms that were correct by construction and unasserted now have tests: a
failed upload writes no success row, so the previous timestamp stands, and a
run whose ledger write rejects after the object landed still reports it
uploaded.
The unit tests either side of this mock Prisma, so neither proves the
migration applies or that the writer and the reader agree on a shape. The
integration file runs the real nightly job against real Postgres with an
in-memory bucket, then reads the row back and asks the console's own
classifier what it says: fresh after a run, one row across two runs, stale
once it ages past two nightly periods, gone when the account is.
The component test pins the case an operator most needs stated: a host with
no bucket configured says so, rather than painting an empty list that reads
as "no problems". The accessibility scan's admin-backups response gains one
row in each state, because a card that paints only its header proves nothing
about the rows anybody reads.
Two small corrections ride along, both from writing the tests. The freshness
badge composes its classes through `cn` like every other surface, and the
error-reporting line waits for the settings to arrive instead of asserting
"nothing is sent" while the answer is still loading.
There is no default error-reporting DSN in this tree and there should not be:
a self-hoster's crash reports must not leave their host because nobody told
them not to. That part was already right, so nothing here adds a default.
What was wrong is what the console said about it. The GlitchTip card showed a
green "Configured" badge as soon as a DSN existed, whether or not the switch
that actually sends anything was on, and it never said where reports go. An
operator reading that badge has been told their errors are being collected
somewhere, which may be true of neither half.
The badge now tracks reports actually leaving, and one line under the switch
states the case: the host they go to, or that they stay here, or that tracking
is on with no target. The host only — the public key in the DSN answers a
different question. The deploy runbook says the same thing for a
maintainer-operated instance.
The nightly off-host job reports counts — uploaded, failed, total — and a
count cannot name the account it is failing for. A cohort where one object
has been refused every night for a month reads as "99 uploaded, 1 failed"
each time, which looks like weather rather than like an account with no
disaster-recovery copy at all.
The worker now writes a ledger row when an object lands (account, instant,
size), and Admin → Backups gains a second card that rates every account
against the nightly schedule: fresh inside one run, due when one run
produced nothing, stale when two did not, never when no object has ever
landed. On a host without BACKUP_S3_* the card says off-host backup is not
configured and stops there.
The verdicts are computed from the ledger, never from a bucket listing: the
worker's grant is deliberately PutObject + GetObject, and an admin page must
not put the operator's credentials on its render path to state a number the
database already holds.
The 1.38.15 entry said PUT where the record-settings route answers PATCH, and promised a rejectedFields field on the managed-profile edit that only the two profile routes carry; the edit refuses with a 422 and the issue list.
The eleven single-record writes answered their shared 429 with prose and
nothing else, while the envelope's own description tells a client to
branch on `meta.errorCode`. On `POST /api/medications/[id]/intake` and
`POST /api/cycle/day-logs` a second, narrower bucket can answer 429 as
well, so the presence of the rate-limit headers was the only thing
telling the two refusals apart.
All eleven now carry `record_write.rate_limited`, the catalogue lists
it, the published 429 names it, and the contract test fails if a site
stops emitting it or the sentence stops publishing it.
The same description now states what a client could not predict from
"300 requests per 60 seconds": refused requests count too, because the
check runs before the body is read.
The single-record write ceiling justified itself with "every one of these
routes is already wrapped in `withIdempotency`". Ten of the eleven are.
`POST /api/medications/intake` is not, and it is the one of the eleven a
native client actually loops — it is replay-tolerant for its own reason,
being an update of a named `intakeId` rather than a create. The comment
now says which is which, and adds the clause it was missing: the check
runs before the body is read, so a refused request spends the allowance
too.
The custom-symptom wrapper said a replay "answered the 409 that
uniqueness raises". There is no such 409. The row's key is minted fresh
per request and the label lives in an AES-GCM column with a per-write
IV, which can carry no unique index, so an un-keyed replay wrote a
second row with the same label — a silent duplicate in the person's own
vocabulary, up to the fifty-row cap. The wrapper is worth more than the
old sentence claimed, not less.
`PUT /api/auth/me/report-selection` threw a bare 422 whose whole `error`
string was `report-selection.leaves.unknown` — a machine token in the
field a client shows a person, with nothing beside it to branch on and
no way to learn which leaves were refused. It now answers a sentence,
with the token in `meta.errorCode` and the refused ids in
`meta.unknownLeaves`, and the operation's description says so.
The site was invisible to the refusal guard because the refusal is
decided by `if (!minted.ok)` rather than by a parse result, so the guard
now reads the refused string as well as the deciding block: every 422
under `src/app/api` whose `error` is a dotted token is inventoried with
the reason it still is one. Eleven remain, each with its reason, and the
inventory may only shrink. Removing the fix above turns it red naming
that route.
The four sibling shape refusals keep their token in `error` on purpose,
and the comment now says why that is not the same decision as the seven
`invalid_json` sites: those moved their string because their status
moved to 400 anyway, while a shape refusal that keeps its 422 would be
changing the wire for nothing. Both halves publish `meta.errorCode`.
Two loose ends in the same guard: a block calling `returnAllZodIssues`
or `apiValidationError` without spelling `422` is now judged (their
default status is 422, so a future `refuse422(err)` helper cannot slip
past), and the site floor moves from 40 to 200 against the 248 the tree
carries — the old floor would have survived losing five matches in six.
The catalogue guard read the route tree plus a hand-kept list of library
modules. The dose-history import builds its file-level codes in a module
that list never named, so `empty_file`, `missing_required_columns`,
`unreadable_json`, `json_not_an_array` and `json_carries_no_intake_time`
shipped on `POST /api/medications/intake/dose-history-import` while the
envelope's own description promised every code was enumerated below, and
the guard was green because it had not read the file.
The sweep now walks the import graph from every route under `src/app`:
1423 modules, resolved through the same `@/…` alias the app uses, with
the generated client never opened. A code is read where it is written,
however many hops from the route that answers with it, and nothing is
hand-listed any more. Seeding from the whole app tree rather than
`src/app/api` also reached the clinician share-link document route,
whose three codes were missing for the same reason.
A tuple of codes is read as a family, like the object form already was,
which is what makes the import's union visible; the constant holding it
is renamed to the `*_ERROR_CODES` spelling the sweep reads, since a list
named for anything else is as likely to be nutrients as error codes. The
two sync-ledger writers are cut out of the text first — `errorCode` on
`IntegrationStatus` is a different field with the same name.
Proven by breaking it both ways: dropping `empty_file` from the
catalogue turns the guard red, and a code planted in
`src/lib/analytics/compliance.ts`, a module no list ever named, turns it
red naming that file.
The adherence journey pinned the tile at the figure its engine produced before a skip left the denominator; with both engines held to one number the tile reads what the card reads.
`meta.errorCode` is the mechanism this API chose for machine-readable
errors, and the envelope's own description tells a client to branch on
it rather than on the prose. Of the two hundred and forty-two codes in
the tree, sixteen appeared anywhere in the contract. A client had to
discover each one by triggering the error in testing, and had no way at
all to learn that a new one had appeared.
They are enumerated now, grouped by the surface that emits them, in the
description of the field they belong to. The list is generated from the
code and committed as a literal so it reads in a diff, and the sentence
in the document is rendered from it rather than written beside it.
Nothing is renamed. Four naming conventions coexist — dot.case, bare
snake_case, a camelCase segment and a hyphen — and a code is a wire
value a shipped client branches on, so they stay. New codes are
dot.case, and the guard is what stops a fifth convention arriving
unnoticed.
Three families stay outside the list and say why: the assistant refusal
builds its last segment from a template, the integration probes are
enumerated per operation where the per-provider differences can be
stated, and a route checking a credential of its own may answer 401
with no code.
The guard re-derives the set from the tree and fails both ways — a code
emitted and not listed, and a code listed and no longer emitted, which
is the worse of the two because a client can write a branch for it and
wait forever.
The batch endpoints have been capped at 60 calls a minute since they
were written. The per-record siblings a naive or older client loops
over — the measurement create, the mood entry, both medication-intake
writes, a lab result, a custom-metric entry, a cycle day-log, a
vaccination, an allergy, a biomarker and an encounter — had no ceiling
at all. That is backwards from the risk: the batch endpoint is the one
a well-behaved client uses, and the unlimited path is the one a broken
loop finds.
All eleven share one generous per-account bucket, `record-write`, at
300 requests a minute. Five writes a second sustained for a full minute
is beyond any hand-driven session and any sync burst, and every one of
these routes is already wrapped in `withIdempotency`, so an honest
retry storm is deduplicated before it is counted — the bucket exists to
cut off the pathological loop, not to shape traffic. It keys on the
ACTING account, the precedent the delegable medication routes set, so a
delegate burns their own allowance rather than locking the record's
owner out of their own log.
The eleven operations publish the bucket name and the cap instead of
the generic refusal, on the shared 429 that already declares
`Retry-After` and the rate-limit triple. A test pulls the key and the
window out of the query the limiter runs and holds the published
sentence to them, so the paragraph cannot drift away from the bucket it
describes.
Two more creates the client replays out of its offline outbox ran the
handler again on the replay. A titration step carries no natural key at
all, so a lost success response left the medication with two dose
changes on the same day and the runway estimate reading off the wrong
one. A custom cycle symptom is unique on its label, so the replay did
not duplicate — it answered the 409 that uniqueness raises, reporting a
conflict the client cannot act on for a row it has no record of
creating.
Both wrap in `withIdempotency`, the composition their siblings already
ship, and both operations publish the header and the in-flight 409 so a
client generated against the contract can tell a retry is safe.
The integration file that drives the medication creates twice against
real Postgres gains the titration case: one dose-change row after the
replay, and a replayed 201 carrying `X-Idempotent-Replay: true`.
`POST /api/mcp/tokens` is deliberately not on this list. Its response
carries a freshly minted `hlk_` credential, and the wrapper refuses to
persist a secret-shaped body — publishing the header there would
promise a replay the mechanism will never perform.
`safeJson` refuses a body that will not parse with 400, and so does
`apiHandler`'s own SyntaxError branch — about two hundred and twenty
routes inherit that. Seven `/api/auth/me/*` writes hand-rolled the
parse in a try/catch and threw 422 for the identical condition, so a
client's "my serializer produced garbage" branch had to accept two
statuses on a subset of routes it had no way to predict.
All seven answer 400 now, with the sentence `safeJson` already sends
and the dotted token each one carried moved to `meta.errorCode`. The
400 is published on those seven operations through a shared response;
it is deliberately not folded into the standard set, which is spread
onto reads as well and a GET has no body to refuse.
`/api/auth/me/health-score-config` keeps its 422: the operation's own
description names that status and its exact message, so moving it is a
contract decision rather than a cleanup. The guard carries it as an
allowlist entry with that reason rather than quietly skipping it.
Three route tests pinned the old status; they assert the new one and
say why. The guard reads the hand-rolled parses out of the tree and
asserts it still finds them, so it cannot pass on a matcher that
stopped matching.
Fifty-nine 422s raised off a Zod `safeParse` answered with one opaque
sentence and nothing a client could map onto a field, while the other
166 sent `details.issues` — the multi-issue envelope that exists so a
caller with three bad fields fixes all three in one round-trip. Twelve
of the fifty-nine put a dotted machine token in `error` where the
sentence belongs, so `error` was sometimes text to show a person and
sometimes a token that must not be shown, with nothing in the payload
to tell them apart.
Every one of them now answers through `apiValidationError`, which keeps
the existing `error` string and the existing `meta` byte for byte and
adds the issue list beside them. The dotted tokens keep their place in
`error` for the clients that already match on them and are published in
`meta.errorCode` as well, which is the field a machine code belongs in
and the one a new client should read.
A guard reads the route tree per refusal site rather than per file —
per file is what let this grow, since a route that used the helper once
looked compliant to a `grep -l` sweep — and asserts it still finds the
sites it judges, so a matcher that stops matching fails instead of
reporting a clean zero.
The admin snapshot paints its worker row in `--destructive` whenever the
process serving the page is not the worker: a split deployment running
`HEALTHLOG_PROCESS_TYPE=web`, or a worker that stopped answering. The token
is AA on a card (4.85:1 in the light theme) but the stat tile lays a
`bg-muted/50` wash over that card, and axe measured the tinted wording at
3.97:1 there, under the 4.5:1 AA floor. `e2e/a11y.spec.ts` went red in
exactly that state and green in every other one, which is why the console
could ship it.
The status grids now name a tone instead of spelling a class at every call
site. Success and warning keep their tint, both clear AA on the tile.
Destructive takes the shape the other status rows already use, the
medication detail row and the invite chips: the token paints a small
indicator and the wording stays in `text-foreground`. The word itself
("Stopped", "Error") states the condition, so nothing hangs on the colour
alone. The database, Umami and GlitchTip rows sit on the same surface with
the same tint and move with it.
The success-affordance guard's two pinned entries for the status grids went
stale in the process: the tint they carried now lives once in the tone
table, so the pins follow it there.
Checked against a standalone build on a throwaway database: the whole a11y
spec green in both themes and both viewports with `HEALTHLOG_PROCESS_TYPE`
at `web` (the failing state) and at `all`. jsdom cannot measure a contrast
ratio, so the new unit test pins the token choice for both arms instead.
The determinism guard counted two Playwright servers and would have refused a third by deletion; the notification journey's mail-configured, scheduler-free process is the third. Pin it by its two distinguishing variables and assert the shared servers carry no mail configuration.
The journey's isolation went one way only. `test.describe.configure` orders
the tests inside the file; the suite is fullyParallel with two workers, so
everything else runs beside it — and its own trigger, the admin reminder
sweep, walked the whole instance and dispatched for every account that had
an overdue dose. With the mail env pointed at the local responder, that
would have started sending real messages for accounts this file has never
heard of, and the exact-equality assertion on the accepted recipients would
have been reading them. The sweep now names the account it then counts, and
the comments that defended the opposite direction say what the exposure
actually is.
Its own server, too, and for two reasons. The `SMTP_*` vars decide whether
the Email card renders at all, so on the shared server they put a card the
axe scan and the card-anatomy sweep had never measured onto
`/settings/integrations` for every spec that opens the route. And unset,
`HEALTHLOG_PROCESS_TYPE` starts the pg-boss reminder scheduler inside the
process serving requests, whose every-fifteen-minutes tick either mints the
missed-dose row that makes the sweep skip its own dispatch or dispatches
beside it. A third server carries both: mail configured, `web`, and only
this spec talks to it.
The shared server keeps `all` on measured grounds rather than taste. Worker
status is per-process and in-memory, so a `web` process reports the worker
stopped, `/admin` renders that row destructive-red, and axe fails it at
3.97:1 against the muted tile — a real contrast defect any operator running
the documented web/worker split already sees, and not this branch's to fix.
That limit is written where the server is defined.
Also here: the stub draws its port per run instead of pinning one, and says
so by name when the port is taken; teardown ends its sockets and survives a
setup that never got as far as starting it; the ledger reset stops deleting
rows whose subject is this account but whose recipient is somebody else,
and clears intake events explicitly rather than through a cascade; the
attempt poll refuses a window larger than the twenty rows the diagnostic
returns; and the header names the precondition the file cannot enforce and
the internal reasons it pins on purpose.
Verified against a production build and a throwaway Postgres: the journey
three times over at one worker, then the a11y and settings geometry specs
at two. Both assertions broken once to see them fail.
The medication detail's notification section decides between the
server-side reminder switch and the client-managed chip on
`notificationPrefs.medication.clientManaged`, read off `GET /api/auth/me`.
That payload never carried the field — the preferences live on their own
endpoint, which is not on the app-boot path — so the flag was `undefined`
for every account: the chip never rendered, and a person whose phone owns
the reminders was shown a switch that no longer decides anything. The
write path and the dispatch gate were correct the whole time; only the
web reflection was missing its end.
The payload now carries the fully-resolved block from the same resolver
the dedicated endpoint uses, so the two cannot disagree, and an account
that never opted in reads `false` rather than absent. No extra query: the
session already loads the row the column sits on.
The pair guard over this payload gained the direction that could not see
it. It asked that every published field has a reader; a reader with no
field was invisible. It now also reads the response types clients declare
for this endpoint and holds them against what the route publishes. A
typed guard was tried first and does not work here — each consumer
declares its own local interface, so the compiler checks every file
against its own private claim and agrees with all of them.
`POST /api/admin/notifications/reminder-check` walked every active
medication on the instance and dispatched a reminder for each overdue
slot it found. That is the operator button's intended behaviour and it
stays the default, but it left any other caller — a browser journey, a
smoke check — writing into every account's delivery ledger at once with
no way to say otherwise.
The body now accepts an optional `userId` that narrows the sweep. It can
only narrow: the route is `requireAdmin()`, cookie-only by construction,
so a Bearer caller never reaches it however wide its scope, and the
selector feeds the Prisma `where` rather than the authorisation. A
bodyless POST — what the admin panel sends — is unchanged. An unknown key
is a 422 instead of a silently instance-wide run.
Published in the contract alongside the notification diagnostic, so the
scope is readable rather than folded into the console-only exemption.
Marc-André Bombeck