Merge work/side-effecting-gets

docs/api/openapi.yaml

@@ -2369,9 +2369,9 @@ paths:
       tags:
         - Sync
       summary: Sync handshake + window metadata
-      description: Cheap 'should I sync?' summary. Returns the previous `lastSyncedAt` checkpoint and advances it server-side
-        on each call. The `sync` block carries the incremental-delta window + tombstone retention so the client reads
-        them rather than hardcoding.
+      description: Cheap 'should I sync?' summary. Returns the `lastSyncedAt` checkpoint, which the batch ingest endpoints
+        advance when a client push lands; this route is a read and writes nothing. The `sync` block carries the
+        incremental-delta window + tombstone retention so the client reads them rather than hardcoding.
       responses:
         "200":
           description: Sync state summary.
@@ -18160,8 +18160,9 @@ components:
         - intakes
         - sync
       additionalProperties: false
-      description: iOS SyncMode handshake. Each GET also advances the server-side `lastSyncedAt` checkpoint and returns the
-        previous value. The cheap 'should I sync?' summary; the durable delta cursor lives on `/api/sync/changes`.
+      description: iOS SyncMode handshake. Reports the server-side `lastSyncedAt` checkpoint, which the batch ingest endpoints
+        set when a client push lands; the handshake itself writes nothing. The cheap 'should I sync?' summary; the
+        durable delta cursor lives on `/api/sync/changes`.
     SyncChangesEnvelope:
       type: object
       properties:

prisma/schema.prisma

@@ -502,6 +502,12 @@ model User {
   // SwiftData backlog before opening a fresh anchored-query window.
   // NULL = never synced; the SyncMode store treats that as "force
   // a full refresh on the next pair".
+  //
+  // Written by the client-push ingest boundaries only — the batch /
+  // bulk endpoints for measurements, mood and intakes (see
+  // `markSyncCheckpoint`). The handshake that reports it is a GET and
+  // writes nothing, so the checkpoint can only trail a real sync
+  // instead of running ahead of one.
   lastSyncedAt DateTime? @map("last_synced_at")
 
   // v0.5.4 ios-coord — daily mood-reminder opt-in.

src/app/api/__tests__/read-routes-write-nothing.test.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,90 @@
+/**
+ * Structural guard: the three read routes that used to write must stay reads.
+ *
+ * `src/lib/api-handler.ts` states the invariant next to `READ_HTTP_METHODS` —
+ * an MCP-audience token is admitted on GET/HEAD/OPTIONS on the REST surface
+ * because those methods are assumed side-effect-free, and adding a
+ * side-effecting GET silently widens that token's reach. These three routes
+ * each broke it once. The runtime tests beside each route prove the specific
+ * write is gone; this one fails on a NEW one.
+ *
+ * Deliberately scoped to these three files and to writes issued directly in
+ * the handler. A repo-wide version is not written today because it cannot be
+ * written without false positives: several read routes call helpers that
+ * legitimately upsert a lazily-created row (`getOrCreateCycleProfile` behind
+ * `requireCycleEnabled` is the clearest one), and a text matcher cannot tell
+ * that apart from a real side effect. Widening this guard means resolving
+ * those cases first, not loosening the pattern.
+ */
+import { readFileSync } from "node:fs";
+import { join } from "node:path";
+
+import { describe, expect, it } from "vitest";
+
+/** Mutating Prisma model methods, as they appear at a call site. */
+const PRISMA_WRITE =
+  /\.(create|createMany|createManyAndReturn|update|updateMany|upsert|delete|deleteMany|executeRaw|executeRawUnsafe)\s*\(/;
+
+/**
+ * Write helpers these routes used to reach for. A helper hides its writes
+ * from the pattern above, so each one that mattered here is named.
+ */
+const WRITE_HELPERS =
+  /\b(persistPredictionCache|markSyncCheckpoint|auditLog\s*\()/;
+
+const ROUTES = [
+  "sync/state/route.ts",
+  "gamification/achievements/route.ts",
+  "cycle/calendar/route.ts",
+];
+
+function sourceOf(relative: string): string {
+  return readFileSync(join(__dirname, "..", relative), "utf8");
+}
+
+/**
+ * Strip comments before matching. Every one of these files DESCRIBES the
+ * write it no longer performs, and a guard that reads prose as code is a
+ * guard that fires on its own documentation.
+ */
+function code(source: string): string {
+  return source.replace(/\/\*[\s\S]*?\*\//g, "").replace(/\/\/.*$/gm, "");
+}
+
+describe("read routes issue no writes", () => {
+  it("the patterns actually match a write — otherwise every case below is vacuous", () => {
+    expect(
+      PRISMA_WRITE.test(`await prisma.user.update({ where: { id } });`),
+    ).toBe(true);
+    expect(
+      PRISMA_WRITE.test(`prisma.userAchievement.createMany({ data });`),
+    ).toBe(true);
+    expect(WRITE_HELPERS.test(`void persistPredictionCache(userId, p);`)).toBe(
+      true,
+    );
+    // And do NOT match the reads these routes are made of.
+    expect(PRISMA_WRITE.test(`await prisma.measurement.findMany({});`)).toBe(
+      false,
+    );
+    expect(PRISMA_WRITE.test(`await prisma.moodEntry.count({});`)).toBe(false);
+  });
+
+  it("scans all three routes and finds real source in each", () => {
+    // An empty read set would pass every assertion below without looking at
+    // anything.
+    expect(ROUTES).toHaveLength(3);
+    for (const route of ROUTES) {
+      expect(code(sourceOf(route)).length).toBeGreaterThan(500);
+    }
+  });
+
+  for (const route of ROUTES) {
+    it(`${route} calls no mutating Prisma method`, () => {
+      expect(code(sourceOf(route))).not.toMatch(PRISMA_WRITE);
+    });
+
+    it(`${route} calls no known write helper`, () => {
+      expect(code(sourceOf(route))).not.toMatch(WRITE_HELPERS);
+    });
+  }
+});

src/app/api/cycle/calendar/__tests__/verdict-round-trip.test.ts

@@ -22,6 +22,12 @@ vi.mock("@/lib/db", () => ({
     menstrualCycle: { findMany: vi.fn() },
     cycleDayLog: { findMany: vi.fn() },
     measurement: { findMany: vi.fn() },
+    // Present so a re-introduced forecast persist is VISIBLE here rather
+    // than blowing up on an undefined model. `persistPredictionCache` calls
+    // `findUnique` synchronously before its first await, so even the old
+    // fire-and-forget `void persistPredictionCache(...)` lands on this mock
+    // before the assertion runs.
+    cyclePrediction: { findUnique: vi.fn(), upsert: vi.fn() },
     auditLog: { create: vi.fn() },
   },
 }));
@@ -34,10 +40,6 @@ vi.mock("@/lib/rate-limit", () => ({
   rateLimitHeaders: () => ({}),
 }));
 vi.mock("@/lib/cycle/gate", () => ({ requireCycleEnabled: vi.fn() }));
-// The cache persist is fire-and-forget and would reach the database.
-vi.mock("@/lib/cycle/prediction-cache", () => ({
-  persistPredictionCache: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue(undefined),
-}));
 vi.mock("@/lib/logging/transports", () => ({ emitIfSampled: vi.fn() }));
 vi.mock("@/lib/db-compat", () => ({
   ensureDbCompatibility: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue(undefined),
@@ -142,6 +144,22 @@ afterEach(() => {
   vi.useRealTimers();
 });
 
+describe("GET /api/cycle/calendar is a read", () => {
+  it("persists no forecast — the reminder cron's row is the job's, not this route's", async () => {
+    vi.useFakeTimers();
+    vi.setSystemTime(new Date("2026-06-10T12:00:00Z"));
+
+    const { status, body } = await callCalendar();
+    expect(status).toBe(200);
+    // There IS a forecast to persist, so the absence of a write is a
+    // decision rather than an empty case.
+    expect((body.data as Record<string, unknown>).prediction).not.toBeNull();
+
+    expect(prisma.cyclePrediction.findUnique).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+    expect(prisma.cyclePrediction.upsert).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+  });
+});
+
 describe("GET /api/cycle/calendar carries the resolved verdict", () => {
   it("puts the whole verdict on the wire", async () => {
     // 2026-06-10 12:00 UTC is already 2026-06-11 for a user at UTC+14.

src/app/api/cycle/calendar/route.ts

@@ -3,9 +3,9 @@
  * (ios-contract §2.D).
  *
  * Calls the pure engine (`predictCycle` + per-day phase) to build
- * `{ profile, prediction, days }`. The synchronous engine call is cheap
- * (pure stats); the heavy part is the cache persist, which is debounced
- * stale-while-revalidate and fire-and-forget so it never blocks the GET.
+ * `{ profile, prediction, days }`. The engine call is cheap (pure stats) and
+ * the route writes nothing — the `CyclePrediction` row the reminder cron
+ * reads is owned by the `cycle-prediction-refresh` job.
  * Fertile-window fields are goal-gated (surfaced for TRYING_TO_CONCEIVE and
  * AVOID_PREGNANCY — the latter with the stronger "not a contraceptive method"
  * disclaimer; suppressed for GENERAL_HEALTH / PERIMENOPAUSE / OFF),
@@ -31,7 +31,6 @@ import {
   cycleDisclaimerKey,
 } from "@/lib/cycle/dto";
 import { resolveCycleVerdict } from "@/lib/cycle/verdict";
-import { persistPredictionCache } from "@/lib/cycle/prediction-cache";
 import { addDays, dayDiff } from "@/lib/cycle/day-math";
 import { BBT_WINDOW } from "@/lib/cycle/types";
 import { DEFAULT_TIMEZONE, moodDateKey } from "@/lib/mood/date-key";
@@ -157,13 +156,14 @@ export const GET = apiHandler(async (request: NextRequest) => {
     goalAllowsFertile,
   );
 
-  // Persist the cache fire-and-forget (debounced) — never block the read.
-  let generatedAt = new Date().toISOString();
-  if (prediction) {
-    const now = new Date();
-    generatedAt = now.toISOString();
-    void persistPredictionCache(user.id, prediction, now);
-  }
+  // v1.35.3 — this read persists nothing. It used to fire
+  // `void persistPredictionCache(...)`: a write on a GET, and a discarded
+  // promise on top, so a failed write left no trace at all. The forecast the
+  // response carries is computed right here from the account's rows; the
+  // `CyclePrediction` row the reminder cron scans is written by the
+  // `cycle-prediction-refresh` job, which reaches every tracking account
+  // rather than the ones that opened this page.
+  const generatedAt = new Date().toISOString();
 
   const locale = await resolveServerLocale({
     request,

src/app/api/gamification/achievements/__tests__/module-gate.test.ts

@@ -217,14 +217,8 @@ describe("GET /api/gamification/achievements — per-module badge skipping", ()
     expect(badges.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
   });
 
-  it("never persists an unlock for a disabled-module badge", async () => {
-    // A mood badge would unlock at >=1 entry; with mood OFF the createMany
-    // must carry no mood achievement row.
-    await badgesFor({ mood: false });
-    const createCalls = vi.mocked(prisma.userAchievement.createMany).mock.calls;
-    for (const [arg] of createCalls) {
-      const rows = (arg as { data: Array<{ achievementId: string }> }).data;
-      expect(rows.some((r) => r.achievementId.includes("mood"))).toBe(false);
-    }
-  });
+  // The "a disabled module never gets its badge pinned" invariant moved with
+  // the write itself — see `src/lib/jobs/__tests__/achievement-unlock-sweep.test.ts`.
+  // That this route persists nothing at all is proved in
+  // `writes-nothing.test.ts`, against a result that HAS a pending unlock.
 });

src/app/api/gamification/achievements/__tests__/writes-nothing.test.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,125 @@
+/**
+ * `GET /api/gamification/achievements` is a read.
+ *
+ * It used to INSERT a `UserAchievement` row for every unlock it noticed,
+ * which is the side-effecting GET the MCP-audience note in `api-handler.ts`
+ * warns against. The evaluation still runs here; only the persistence moved
+ * to the `achievement-unlock-sweep` job.
+ *
+ * The builder is faked so the result ALWAYS carries a pending unlock. That is
+ * the point: an assertion that the route did not write is worth nothing
+ * against a fixture that had nothing to write, and the fixture in
+ * `module-gate.test.ts` turns out to be exactly that.
+ */
+import { describe, it, expect, vi, beforeEach } from "vitest";
+import { NextRequest } from "next/server";
+
+vi.mock("@/lib/db", () => ({
+  prisma: { userAchievement: { findMany: vi.fn(), createMany: vi.fn() } },
+}));
+
+vi.mock("@/lib/auth/session", () => ({ getSession: vi.fn() }));
+vi.mock("@/lib/logging/transports", () => ({ emitIfSampled: vi.fn() }));
+vi.mock("@/lib/db-compat", () => ({
+  ensureDbCompatibility: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue(undefined),
+}));
+vi.mock("next/headers", () => ({
+  headers: vi.fn(async () => ({ get: () => null })),
+  cookies: vi.fn(async () => ({
+    get: () => undefined,
+    set: () => {},
+    delete: () => {},
+  })),
+}));
+vi.mock("@/lib/modules/gate", () => ({
+  requireModuleEnabled: vi.fn(async () => ({ enabled: true })),
+  resolveModuleMap: vi.fn(async () => ({})),
+  MODULE_DISABLED_ERROR_CODE: "module.disabled",
+}));
+
+const PENDING_UNLOCK = {
+  achievementId: "mood-first-entry",
+  unlockedAt: new Date("2026-03-02T08:00:00.000Z"),
+};
+
+vi.mock("@/lib/gamification/achievements-result", () => ({
+  buildAchievementsResult: vi.fn(async () => ({
+    summary: { unlockedCount: 1, totalCount: 1 },
+    achievements: [
+      {
+        id: "mood-first-entry",
+        category: "mood",
+        unlocked: true,
+        completedAt: "2026-03-02T08:00:00.000Z",
+        titleKey: "achievements.moodFirst.title",
+        descriptionKey: "achievements.moodFirst.description",
+        icon: "Smile",
+        progressPercent: 100,
+        points: 10,
+        target: 1,
+        current: 1,
+        isHidden: false,
+      },
+    ],
+    metrics: {},
+    pendingUnlocks: [PENDING_UNLOCK],
+  })),
+}));
+
+import { GET } from "../route";
+import { prisma } from "@/lib/db";
+import { getSession } from "@/lib/auth/session";
+import { buildAchievementsResult } from "@/lib/gamification/achievements-result";
+import { __resetAllCachesForTests } from "@/lib/cache/server-cache";
+
+const SESSION_OK = {
+  session: { id: "sess-1", expiresAt: new Date(Date.now() + 3_600_000) },
+  user: {
+    id: "user-1",
+    username: "tester",
+    role: "USER" as const,
+    createdAt: new Date("2026-03-01T00:00:00.000Z"),
+    locale: "en",
+  },
+};
+
+beforeEach(() => {
+  vi.clearAllMocks();
+  __resetAllCachesForTests();
+  vi.mocked(getSession).mockResolvedValue(SESSION_OK as never);
+});
+
+async function callGet() {
+  const res = await GET(
+    new NextRequest("http://localhost/api/gamification/achievements"),
+  );
+  return { status: res.status, body: JSON.parse(await res.text()) };
+}
+
+describe("GET /api/gamification/achievements", () => {
+  it("has a pending unlock to notice — otherwise the case below is empty", async () => {
+    await callGet();
+    const result = await vi.mocked(buildAchievementsResult).mock.results[0]!
+      .value;
+    expect(result.pendingUnlocks).toHaveLength(1);
+  });
+
+  it("persists nothing — a GET does not write", async () => {
+    const { status } = await callGet();
+    expect(status).toBe(200);
+    expect(prisma.userAchievement.createMany).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+  });
+
+  it("still renders the unlocked badge, so the payload never depended on the row", async () => {
+    const { body } = await callGet();
+    const achievements = (body.data as { achievements: Array<unknown> })
+      .achievements as Array<{ id: string; unlocked: boolean }>;
+    expect(achievements).toHaveLength(1);
+    expect(achievements[0]!.unlocked).toBe(true);
+  });
+
+  it("does not leak the internal pendingUnlocks carrier onto the wire", async () => {
+    const { body } = await callGet();
+    expect(body.data).not.toHaveProperty("pendingUnlocks");
+  });
+});

src/app/api/gamification/achievements/route.ts

@@ -1,4 +1,3 @@
-import { prisma } from "@/lib/db";
 import { apiHandler, requireAuth } from "@/lib/api-handler";
 import { requireModuleEnabled, resolveModuleMap } from "@/lib/modules/gate";
 import { annotate } from "@/lib/logging/context";
@@ -62,9 +61,7 @@ export const GET = apiHandler(async (request: NextRequest) => {
   // iOS-format branch runs the locale-aware transform after the cache
   // read so the cache stays format-agnostic and the achievement-progress
   // dashboard duplicate (seen twice per dashboard mount in the v1.4.33
-  // HAR) coalesces into one builder call. v1.18.0 B5 — unlock persistence
-  // now happens in the handler after the cache read (idempotent), not as
-  // a side effect inside the cached factory.
+  // HAR) coalesces into one builder call.
   // v1.18.0 B5 — resolve the per-user module map once and pass it into the
   // builder so badge categories whose owning module is disabled (sleep
   // badges when sleep is off, mood badges when mood is off) are skipped
@@ -76,8 +73,7 @@ export const GET = apiHandler(async (request: NextRequest) => {
   // 10-minute stale window; the app-wide `AchievementUnlockNotifier` polls
   // every 2 minutes, so a hard-TTL read always missed and re-paid the cold
   // build. SWR serves the prior payload instantly and warms one background
-  // recompute. Persistence of `pendingUnlocks` stays OUTSIDE this read (see
-  // below), so a stale-served body never skips an unlock write.
+  // recompute.
   const result = await cachedSwr(
     caches.achievements as ServerCache<AchievementsResult>,
     user.id,
@@ -85,25 +81,19 @@ export const GET = apiHandler(async (request: NextRequest) => {
     annotate,
   );
 
-  // v1.18.0 B5 — persist newly unlocked achievements OUTSIDE the cached
-  // factory. `createMany({ skipDuplicates: true })` is idempotent on the
-  // `(userId, achievementId)` unique, so re-running it on a cache hit is
-  // a no-op rather than a duplicate, and the write is never skipped just
-  // because the read was served from cache.
-  if (result.pendingUnlocks.length > 0) {
-    await prisma.userAchievement.createMany({
-      data: result.pendingUnlocks.map((u) => ({
-        userId: user.id,
-        achievementId: u.achievementId,
-        unlockedAt: new Date(u.unlockedAt),
-      })),
-      skipDuplicates: true,
-    });
-    annotate({
-      action: { name: "gamification.achievements" },
-      meta: { newUnlocks: result.pendingUnlocks.length },
-    });
-  }
+  // v1.35.3 — the unlock rows are NOT written here. A GET must not have side
+  // effects (`api-handler.ts`, the MCP-audience note above
+  // `READ_HTTP_METHODS`), and this INSERT was one. The badge grid does not
+  // need the rows: `unlocked` comes from the live metrics and the completion
+  // date is derived from the account's own history, so the payload below is
+  // identical whether or not a row exists. The rows pin that date against a
+  // later data edit and carry it into the backup, which is durable work and
+  // belongs on the `achievement-unlock-sweep` job — where it also covers the
+  // accounts that never open this page.
+  annotate({
+    action: { name: "gamification.achievements" },
+    meta: { pendingUnlocks: result.pendingUnlocks.length },
+  });
 
   // Strip the internal `pendingUnlocks` carrier; it never goes on the wire.
   const payload = {

src/app/api/measurements/batch/__tests__/pr-detection-hook.test.ts

@@ -156,6 +156,7 @@ describe("POST /api/measurements/batch — PR detection enqueue (v1.4.25 W16c)",
       // This batch declares no trigger, so the trigger field is nulled and the
       // background timestamp is not written — see the sync-trigger suite.
       data: {
+        lastSyncedAt: expect.any(Date),
         healthKitLastSyncedAt: expect.any(Date),
         healthKitLastSyncTrigger: null,
       },
@@ -170,7 +171,12 @@ describe("POST /api/measurements/batch — PR detection enqueue (v1.4.25 W16c)",
     );
 
     expect(res.status).toBe(200);
-    expect(prisma.user.update).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+    // The SyncMode checkpoint still advances — a MANUAL push is a client
+    // sync — but none of the HealthKit-specific fields are touched.
+    expect(prisma.user.update).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
+      where: { id: "user-1" },
+      data: { lastSyncedAt: expect.any(Date) },
+    });
   });
 
   it("surfaces a hard reconciliation failure without checkpointing it", async () => {

src/app/api/measurements/batch/route.ts

@@ -643,9 +643,18 @@ async function postBatch(request: NextRequest): Promise<Response> {
       );
     });
 
-  // This batch route is the native HealthKit ingestion boundary. Stamp only
-  // after every attempted write has reached a durable, non-failed verdict;
-  // MANUAL-only and skipped-only batches are not HealthKit syncs.
+  // This batch route is the native ingestion boundary, so it is also where the
+  // SyncMode checkpoint (`User.lastSyncedAt`, the same column
+  // `markSyncCheckpoint` writes) is established — `GET /api/sync/state` only
+  // reports it. The checkpoint covers MANUAL pushes too: the client synced
+  // whatever it was holding. A batch carrying a hard failure leaves the
+  // checkpoint where it was, so the undelivered window stays inside whatever
+  // the client asks for next.
+  //
+  // The HealthKit fields ride the same update and keep their narrower
+  // condition. Stamp only after every attempted write has reached a durable,
+  // non-failed verdict; MANUAL-only and skipped-only batches are not
+  // HealthKit syncs.
   //
   // The trigger the client declared is stamped alongside, and a background- or
   // push-triggered batch additionally dates `healthKitLastBackgroundSyncAt`.
@@ -655,17 +664,22 @@ async function postBatch(request: NextRequest): Promise<Response> {
   // trigger writes null over the previous value rather than leaving a stale one
   // standing: the field describes THIS sync, and an older build's silence is
   // not evidence about it.
-  if (healthKitSyncSucceeded) {
+  if (failedCount === 0) {
     const syncedAt = new Date();
     const deliveredWithoutTheApp =
       syncTrigger === "background" || syncTrigger === "push";
     await prisma.user.update({
       where: { id: user.id },
       data: {
-        healthKitLastSyncedAt: syncedAt,
-        healthKitLastSyncTrigger: syncTrigger ?? null,
-        ...(deliveredWithoutTheApp
-          ? { healthKitLastBackgroundSyncAt: syncedAt }
+        lastSyncedAt: syncedAt,
+        ...(healthKitSyncSucceeded
+          ? {
+              healthKitLastSyncedAt: syncedAt,
+              healthKitLastSyncTrigger: syncTrigger ?? null,
+              ...(deliveredWithoutTheApp
+                ? { healthKitLastBackgroundSyncAt: syncedAt }
+                : {}),
+            }
           : {}),
       },
     });

src/app/api/medications/intake/bulk/__tests__/route.test.ts

@@ -21,6 +21,9 @@ vi.mock("@/lib/db", () => ({
       // v1.15.19 — resolver-null convergence probe before standalone insert.
       findFirst: vi.fn(),
     },
+    // The bulk drain stamps the SyncMode checkpoint (`User.lastSyncedAt`) —
+    // it is a client push, and the push is what the checkpoint describes.
+    user: { update: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue({}) },
     auditLog: { create: vi.fn() },
   },
 }));
@@ -1486,3 +1489,49 @@ describe("POST /api/medications/intake/bulk — identity stability floor", () =>
     expect(prisma.medicationIntakeEvent.create).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
   });
 });
+
+// ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+// SyncMode checkpoint — the push owns `User.lastSyncedAt`
+// ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+/**
+ * `GET /api/sync/state` reports the checkpoint and writes nothing, so the
+ * ingest boundaries are the only writers. If this one stops stamping, the
+ * checkpoint stays null forever and every paired client re-pairs full.
+ */
+describe("POST /api/medications/intake/bulk — sync checkpoint", () => {
+  beforeEach(() => {
+    vi.mocked(prisma.medication.findMany).mockResolvedValue([
+      { id: "med-1" },
+    ] as never);
+    vi.mocked(prisma.medication.findFirst).mockResolvedValue(null as never);
+    vi.mocked(prisma.medicationIntakeEvent.findMany).mockResolvedValue(
+      [] as never,
+    );
+    vi.mocked(prisma.medicationIntakeEvent.findFirst).mockResolvedValue(
+      null as never,
+    );
+    vi.mocked(prisma.medicationIntakeEvent.create).mockResolvedValue({
+      id: "row-1",
+    } as never);
+  });
+
+  it("stamps lastSyncedAt when the drain lands", async () => {
+    const res = await POST(
+      postReq({
+        entries: [
+          {
+            medicationId: "med-1",
+            scheduledFor: "2026-06-15T05:00:00.000Z",
+            takenAt: "2026-06-15T05:02:00.000Z",
+          },
+        ],
+      }),
+    );
+    expect(res.status).toBe(200);
+    expect(prisma.user.update).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
+    expect(prisma.user.update).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
+      where: { id: "user-1" },
+      data: { lastSyncedAt: expect.any(Date) },
+    });
+  });
+});

src/app/api/medications/intake/bulk/route.ts

@@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ import {
 } from "@/lib/api-response";
 import { withIdempotency } from "@/lib/idempotency";
 import { checkRateLimit } from "@/lib/rate-limit";
+import { markSyncCheckpoint } from "@/lib/sync/checkpoint";
 import { invalidateUserMedications } from "@/lib/cache/invalidate";
 import {
   recomputeMedicationComplianceForDay,
@@ -932,6 +933,12 @@ async function postBulk(request: NextRequest): Promise<Response> {
     })();
   }
 
+  // The SyncMode checkpoint belongs to the push that moved the data, not to
+  // the `/api/sync/state` handshake that reports it. This endpoint is one of
+  // the three domains that handshake summarises, so an intake drain advances
+  // it.
+  await markSyncCheckpoint(user.id);
+
   return apiSuccess({
     processed: entries.length,
     inserted,

src/app/api/mood-entries/bulk/__tests__/route.test.ts

@@ -29,6 +29,9 @@ const { moodEntryMock, txClient } = vi.hoisted(() => {
 vi.mock("@/lib/db", () => ({
   prisma: {
     moodEntry: moodEntryMock,
+    // The bulk drain stamps the SyncMode checkpoint (`User.lastSyncedAt`) —
+    // it is a client push, and the push is what the checkpoint describes.
+    user: { update: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue({}) },
     auditLog: { create: vi.fn() },
     $transaction: vi.fn(async (fn: unknown) => {
       if (typeof fn === "function") {
@@ -688,3 +691,32 @@ describe("POST /api/mood-entries/bulk — upsert + tag links are atomic", () =>
     expect(prisma.$transaction).toHaveBeenCalled();
   });
 });
+
+/**
+ * The SyncMode checkpoint (`User.lastSyncedAt`) belongs to the push that moved
+ * the data. `GET /api/sync/state` reports it and writes nothing, so if this
+ * boundary stops stamping, the checkpoint stays null forever and every paired
+ * client re-pairs with a full backfill.
+ */
+describe("POST /api/mood-entries/bulk — sync checkpoint", () => {
+  beforeEach(() => {
+    vi.mocked(prisma.moodEntry.findMany).mockResolvedValue([]);
+    vi.mocked(prisma.moodEntry.upsert).mockResolvedValue({
+      id: "entry-1",
+    } as never);
+  });
+
+  it("stamps lastSyncedAt when the drain lands", async () => {
+    const res = await POST(
+      postReq({
+        entries: [{ mood: "OKAY", moodLoggedAt: "2026-05-16T08:00:00.000Z" }],
+      }),
+    );
+    expect(res.status).toBe(200);
+    expect(prisma.user.update).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
+    expect(prisma.user.update).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
+      where: { id: "user-1" },
+      data: { lastSyncedAt: expect.any(Date) },
+    });
+  });
+});

src/app/api/mood-entries/bulk/route.ts

@@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ import {
 } from "@/lib/api-response";
 import { withIdempotency } from "@/lib/idempotency";
 import { checkRateLimit } from "@/lib/rate-limit";
+import { markSyncCheckpoint } from "@/lib/sync/checkpoint";
 import {
   getScoreForMood,
   moodLevelEnum,
@@ -493,6 +494,11 @@ async function postBulk(request: NextRequest): Promise<Response> {
     }
   }
 
+  // The SyncMode checkpoint belongs to the push that moved the data, not to
+  // the `/api/sync/state` handshake that reports it. This endpoint is one of
+  // the three domains that handshake summarises, so a mood drain advances it.
+  await markSyncCheckpoint(user.id);
+
   return apiSuccess({
     processed: entries.length,
     inserted,

src/app/api/sync/state/__tests__/route.test.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,92 @@
+/**
+ * `GET /api/sync/state` is a read.
+ *
+ * It used to bump `User.lastSyncedAt` on every call, which is the exact
+ * side-effecting GET the MCP-audience note in `api-handler.ts` warns against,
+ * and it advanced the checkpoint past a window the client had not drained.
+ * The checkpoint is now owned by the ingest boundaries; this route reports it.
+ */
+import { describe, it, expect, vi, beforeEach } from "vitest";
+
+vi.mock("@/lib/api-handler", () => ({
+  apiHandler: <T extends (...args: unknown[]) => unknown>(fn: T) => fn,
+  requireAuth: vi.fn(async () => ({ user: { id: "u1" } })),
+}));
+
+vi.mock("@/lib/db", () => ({
+  prisma: {
+    measurement: { findFirst: vi.fn(), count: vi.fn() },
+    moodEntry: { findFirst: vi.fn(), count: vi.fn() },
+    medicationIntakeEvent: { findFirst: vi.fn(), count: vi.fn() },
+    user: { findUnique: vi.fn(), update: vi.fn() },
+  },
+}));
+
+vi.mock("@/lib/logging/context", () => ({ annotate: vi.fn() }));
+
+vi.mock("@/lib/api-response", () => ({
+  apiSuccess: (data: unknown) => ({ data, error: null }),
+}));
+
+import { GET } from "../route";
+import { prisma } from "@/lib/db";
+
+const CHECKPOINT = new Date("2026-07-30T08:15:00.000Z");
+
+type SyncStateBody = {
+  lastSyncedAt: string | null;
+  serverNow: string;
+  timezone: string;
+};
+
+async function callGet(): Promise<SyncStateBody> {
+  const res = (await (
+    GET as unknown as (req: unknown) => Promise<{ data: SyncStateBody }>
+  )({})) as { data: SyncStateBody };
+  return res.data;
+}
+
+describe("GET /api/sync/state", () => {
+  beforeEach(() => {
+    vi.clearAllMocks();
+    vi.mocked(prisma.measurement.findFirst).mockResolvedValue(null as never);
+    vi.mocked(prisma.moodEntry.findFirst).mockResolvedValue(null as never);
+    vi.mocked(prisma.medicationIntakeEvent.findFirst).mockResolvedValue(
+      null as never,
+    );
+    vi.mocked(prisma.measurement.count).mockResolvedValue(0 as never);
+    vi.mocked(prisma.moodEntry.count).mockResolvedValue(0 as never);
+    vi.mocked(prisma.medicationIntakeEvent.count).mockResolvedValue(0 as never);
+    vi.mocked(prisma.user.findUnique).mockResolvedValue({
+      lastSyncedAt: CHECKPOINT,
+      timezone: "Europe/Berlin",
+    } as never);
+  });
+
+  it("writes nothing — the handshake never touches the user row", async () => {
+    await callGet();
+    expect(prisma.user.update).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+  });
+
+  it("reports the stored checkpoint rather than the previous handshake", async () => {
+    const body = await callGet();
+    expect(body.lastSyncedAt).toBe(CHECKPOINT.toISOString());
+  });
+
+  it("keeps reporting the same checkpoint across repeated calls", async () => {
+    const first = await callGet();
+    const second = await callGet();
+    expect(second.lastSyncedAt).toBe(first.lastSyncedAt);
+    expect(prisma.user.update).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+  });
+
+  it("reports a never-synced account as null so the client re-pairs full", async () => {
+    vi.mocked(prisma.user.findUnique).mockResolvedValue({
+      lastSyncedAt: null,
+      timezone: "Europe/Berlin",
+    } as never);
+    const body = await callGet();
+    expect(body.lastSyncedAt).toBeNull();
+    expect(prisma.user.update).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+  });
+});

src/app/api/sync/state/route.ts

@@ -12,7 +12,9 @@
  *   {
  *     userId,
  *     timezone,
- *     lastSyncedAt,             — User.lastSyncedAt (ISO string or null)
+ *     lastSyncedAt,             — User.lastSyncedAt (ISO string or null).
+ *                                 Set by the ingest boundaries, not here:
+ *                                 this route is a read and writes nothing.
  *     serverNow,                — `new Date().toISOString()` for clock skew
  *     measurements: { lastUpdatedAt, liveCount, tombstonedCount },
  *     mood:         { lastUpdatedAt, liveCount, tombstonedCount },
@@ -45,10 +47,10 @@ import {
 export const GET = apiHandler(async (_request: NextRequest) => {
   const { user } = await requireAuth();
 
-  // Per-domain aggregate reads + one user-side bump. Each runs against
-  // indexed columns (userId, deleted_at / updated_at) so it stays
-  // O(rows-for-user) and not O(rows-across-tenants). v1.7.0 adds the
-  // mood + intake blocks now that both carry the sync columns.
+  // Per-domain aggregate reads. Each runs against indexed columns (userId,
+  // deleted_at / updated_at) so it stays O(rows-for-user) and not
+  // O(rows-across-tenants). v1.7.0 adds the mood + intake blocks now that
+  // both carry the sync columns.
   const [
     measurementLatest,
     measurementLive,
@@ -96,16 +98,14 @@ export const GET = apiHandler(async (_request: NextRequest) => {
     }),
   ]);
 
-  // The handshake also bumps the user's lastSyncedAt — the call IS
-  // the handshake. iOS reads the OLD lastSyncedAt from the response
-  // and then trusts that subsequent server writes after the new
-  // checkpoint will round-trip via the standard read paths.
-  const previous = currentUser?.lastSyncedAt ?? null;
-  const nextCheckpoint = new Date();
-  await prisma.user.update({
-    where: { id: user.id },
-    data: { lastSyncedAt: nextCheckpoint },
-  });
+  // The handshake reports the checkpoint; it does not set it. The column is
+  // stamped by the ingest boundaries that actually move data (see
+  // `markSyncCheckpoint`), so `lastSyncedAt` answers "when did this account
+  // last push a batch" rather than "when did a client last ask". NULL still
+  // means never synced, and the value can now only trail the truth — the
+  // handshake used to advance it past a window the client had not drained.
+  const lastSyncedAt = currentUser?.lastSyncedAt ?? null;
+  const serverNow = new Date();
 
   annotate({
     action: { name: "sync.state" },
@@ -114,15 +114,15 @@ export const GET = apiHandler(async (_request: NextRequest) => {
       tombstonedCount: measurementTomb,
       moodLiveCount: moodLive,
       intakeLiveCount: intakeLive,
-      lastSyncedAtBefore: previous?.toISOString() ?? null,
+      lastSyncedAt: lastSyncedAt?.toISOString() ?? null,
     },
   });
 
   return apiSuccess({
     userId: user.id,
     timezone: currentUser?.timezone ?? "Europe/Berlin",
-    lastSyncedAt: previous?.toISOString() ?? null,
-    serverNow: nextCheckpoint.toISOString(),
+    lastSyncedAt: lastSyncedAt?.toISOString() ?? null,
+    serverNow: serverNow.toISOString(),
     measurements: {
       lastUpdatedAt: measurementLatest?.updatedAt?.toISOString() ?? null,
       liveCount: measurementLive,

src/lib/cycle/__tests__/prediction-refresh.test.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,118 @@
+/**
+ * `refreshPredictionCacheForUser` — the request-free recompute the nightly
+ * job runs.
+ *
+ * Two things are load-bearing. It has to reach the persistence at all (the
+ * job's whole purpose is that a forecast exists for an account that never
+ * opened the calendar), and the write's failure has to escape: the previous
+ * implementation caught everything and returned, so a cache that had not been
+ * written for weeks looked exactly like one with nothing to write.
+ */
+import { describe, it, expect, vi, beforeEach } from "vitest";
+
+vi.mock("@/lib/db", () => ({
+  prisma: {
+    cycleProfile: { findUnique: vi.fn() },
+    user: { findUnique: vi.fn() },
+    menstrualCycle: { findMany: vi.fn() },
+    cycleDayLog: { findMany: vi.fn() },
+    measurement: { findMany: vi.fn() },
+    cyclePrediction: { findUnique: vi.fn(), upsert: vi.fn() },
+  },
+}));
+
+import { prisma } from "@/lib/db";
+import { refreshPredictionCacheForUser } from "@/lib/cycle/prediction-refresh";
+
+const NOW = new Date("2026-06-10T02:20:00.000Z");
+
+function profile(overrides: Record<string, unknown> = {}) {
+  return {
+    userId: "user-1",
+    goal: "GENERAL_HEALTH",
+    typicalCycleLength: 28,
+    typicalPeriodLength: 5,
+    lutealPhaseLength: 14,
+    predictionEnabled: true,
+    rawChartMode: false,
+    secondarySymptom: "MUCUS",
+    cycleTrackingEnabled: true,
+    ...overrides,
+  };
+}
+
+/** Four period starts 28 days apart, the last one still open. */
+const CYCLE_STARTS = ["2026-03-05", "2026-04-02", "2026-04-30", "2026-05-28"];
+
+beforeEach(() => {
+  vi.clearAllMocks();
+  vi.mocked(prisma.cycleProfile.findUnique).mockResolvedValue(
+    profile() as never,
+  );
+  vi.mocked(prisma.user.findUnique).mockResolvedValue({
+    timezone: "Europe/Berlin",
+  } as never);
+  vi.mocked(prisma.menstrualCycle.findMany).mockResolvedValue(
+    CYCLE_STARTS.map((startDate, i) => ({
+      id: `cyc-${i}`,
+      userId: "user-1",
+      startDate,
+      endDate: null,
+      periodEndDate: null,
+      ovulationDate: null,
+      ovulationConfirmed: false,
+    })) as never,
+  );
+  vi.mocked(prisma.cycleDayLog.findMany).mockResolvedValue([] as never);
+  vi.mocked(prisma.measurement.findMany).mockResolvedValue([] as never);
+  vi.mocked(prisma.cyclePrediction.findUnique).mockResolvedValue(null as never);
+  vi.mocked(prisma.cyclePrediction.upsert).mockResolvedValue({} as never);
+});
+
+describe("refreshPredictionCacheForUser", () => {
+  it("writes the forecast for an account that never opened the calendar", async () => {
+    const outcome = await refreshPredictionCacheForUser("user-1", NOW);
+
+    expect(outcome).toBe("persisted");
+    expect(prisma.cyclePrediction.upsert).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
+    const call = vi.mocked(prisma.cyclePrediction.upsert).mock.calls[0]![0] as {
+      where: { userId: string };
+      create: { nextPeriodStart: string; generatedAt: Date };
+    };
+    expect(call.where.userId).toBe("user-1");
+    // A real forecast, not a placeholder: four 28-day cycles put the next
+    // period start 28 days after the last one.
+    expect(call.create.nextPeriodStart).toBe("2026-06-25");
+    expect(call.create.generatedAt).toEqual(NOW);
+  });
+
+  it("writes nothing for an account with prediction turned off", async () => {
+    vi.mocked(prisma.cycleProfile.findUnique).mockResolvedValue(
+      profile({ predictionEnabled: false }) as never,
+    );
+
+    const outcome = await refreshPredictionCacheForUser("user-1", NOW);
+
+    expect(outcome).toBe("no-prediction");
+    expect(prisma.cyclePrediction.upsert).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+  });
+
+  it("writes nothing for an account that has no cycle profile", async () => {
+    vi.mocked(prisma.cycleProfile.findUnique).mockResolvedValue(null as never);
+
+    const outcome = await refreshPredictionCacheForUser("user-1", NOW);
+
+    expect(outcome).toBe("no-profile");
+    expect(prisma.cyclePrediction.upsert).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+  });
+
+  it("lets a failed write escape instead of swallowing it", async () => {
+    vi.mocked(prisma.cyclePrediction.upsert).mockRejectedValue(
+      new Error("write rejected"),
+    );
+
+    await expect(
+      refreshPredictionCacheForUser("user-1", NOW),
+    ).rejects.toThrowError("write rejected");
+  });
+});

src/lib/cycle/prediction-cache.ts

@@ -2,13 +2,20 @@
  * Cycle prediction cache — debounced stale-while-revalidate (the v1.8.7
  * insight-assessment cache pattern, ios-contract §2.D).
  *
- * `GET /api/cycle/calendar` runs the pure engine synchronously (it is
- * cheap) for the live forecast it returns, AND persists that forecast to
- * the `CyclePrediction` cache row so the Coach snapshot + notifications
- * read a stable materialised value without re-running the engine. The
- * persist is debounced: a re-write only lands when the prior row is older
- * than the debounce window OR the forecast actually changed, so a tight
- * read loop never thrashes the row.
+ * The `CyclePrediction` row is what the cycle-reminder cron scans to find
+ * who is due a period-soon or fertile-soon push. It is written by the
+ * `cycle-prediction-refresh` job (see `prediction-refresh.ts`), never by a
+ * read: `GET /api/cycle/calendar` runs the same engine for the forecast it
+ * returns and persists nothing.
+ *
+ * The persist is debounced: a re-write only lands when the prior row is
+ * older than the debounce window OR the forecast actually changed, so a
+ * repeated refresh never thrashes the row.
+ *
+ * Failures propagate. This used to swallow every error, which made a cache
+ * that had not been written for weeks indistinguishable from one with
+ * nothing to write; the caller is a job and puts the failure on the
+ * operator's failing-jobs surface.
  */
 import { prisma } from "@/lib/db";
 import type { CyclePredictionResult } from "@/lib/cycle/types";
@@ -18,63 +25,58 @@ const PREDICTION_DEBOUNCE_MS = 6 * 60 * 60 * 1000; // 6h
 
 /**
  * Persist (or refresh) the cached forecast for a user, debounced. A
- * no-op when a fresh-enough identical row already exists. Best-effort:
- * never throws into the read path.
+ * no-op when a fresh-enough identical row already exists.
  */
 export async function persistPredictionCache(
   userId: string,
   result: CyclePredictionResult,
   now: Date = new Date(),
 ): Promise<void> {
-  try {
-    const existing = await prisma.cyclePrediction.findUnique({
-      where: { userId },
-      select: {
-        method: true,
-        nextPeriodStart: true,
-        nextPeriodStartLow: true,
-        nextPeriodStartHigh: true,
-        confidence: true,
-        cyclesObserved: true,
-        generatedAt: true,
-      },
-    });
+  const existing = await prisma.cyclePrediction.findUnique({
+    where: { userId },
+    select: {
+      method: true,
+      nextPeriodStart: true,
+      nextPeriodStartLow: true,
+      nextPeriodStartHigh: true,
+      confidence: true,
+      cyclesObserved: true,
+      generatedAt: true,
+    },
+  });
 
-    const unchanged =
-      existing !== null &&
-      existing.method === result.method &&
-      existing.nextPeriodStart === result.nextPeriodStart &&
-      existing.nextPeriodStartLow === result.nextPeriodStartLow &&
-      existing.nextPeriodStartHigh === result.nextPeriodStartHigh &&
-      existing.confidence === result.confidence &&
-      existing.cyclesObserved === result.cyclesObserved;
+  const unchanged =
+    existing !== null &&
+    existing.method === result.method &&
+    existing.nextPeriodStart === result.nextPeriodStart &&
+    existing.nextPeriodStartLow === result.nextPeriodStartLow &&
+    existing.nextPeriodStartHigh === result.nextPeriodStartHigh &&
+    existing.confidence === result.confidence &&
+    existing.cyclesObserved === result.cyclesObserved;
 
-    const fresh =
-      existing !== null &&
-      now.getTime() - existing.generatedAt.getTime() < PREDICTION_DEBOUNCE_MS;
+  const fresh =
+    existing !== null &&
+    now.getTime() - existing.generatedAt.getTime() < PREDICTION_DEBOUNCE_MS;
 
-    // Skip the write only when the row is BOTH unchanged AND fresh.
-    if (unchanged && fresh) return;
+  // Skip the write only when the row is BOTH unchanged AND fresh.
+  if (unchanged && fresh) return;
 
-    const data = {
-      method: result.method,
-      nextPeriodStart: result.nextPeriodStart,
-      nextPeriodStartLow: result.nextPeriodStartLow,
-      nextPeriodStartHigh: result.nextPeriodStartHigh,
-      fertileWindowStart: result.fertileWindowStart,
-      fertileWindowEnd: result.fertileWindowEnd,
-      predictedOvulation: result.predictedOvulation,
-      confidence: result.confidence,
-      cyclesObserved: result.cyclesObserved,
-      generatedAt: now,
-    };
+  const data = {
+    method: result.method,
+    nextPeriodStart: result.nextPeriodStart,
+    nextPeriodStartLow: result.nextPeriodStartLow,
+    nextPeriodStartHigh: result.nextPeriodStartHigh,
+    fertileWindowStart: result.fertileWindowStart,
+    fertileWindowEnd: result.fertileWindowEnd,
+    predictedOvulation: result.predictedOvulation,
+    confidence: result.confidence,
+    cyclesObserved: result.cyclesObserved,
+    generatedAt: now,
+  };
 
-    await prisma.cyclePrediction.upsert({
-      where: { userId },
-      create: { userId, ...data },
-      update: data,
-    });
-  } catch {
-    /* best-effort cache write — the live engine result is authoritative */
-  }
+  await prisma.cyclePrediction.upsert({
+    where: { userId },
+    create: { userId, ...data },
+    update: data,
+  });
 }

src/lib/cycle/prediction-refresh.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,126 @@
+/**
+ * Recompute the cached cycle forecast for one account from the persisted
+ * rows, without a request.
+ *
+ * `CyclePrediction` is not a cache of a read — it is the index the
+ * cycle-reminder cron scans to find who is due a period-soon or fertile-soon
+ * push. Until v1.35.3 its only writer was `GET /api/cycle/calendar`, which
+ * meant the reminders an account received depended on whether somebody had
+ * opened the calendar recently, and the write itself was a discarded promise
+ * inside a `try {} catch {}` that swallowed the failure. Both ends are fixed
+ * here: the refresh runs on the schedule that consumes it, and a failed write
+ * throws so the job reports it.
+ *
+ * The reads mirror the calendar route's default window so the forecast the
+ * cron scans and the forecast the calendar renders come out of the same
+ * inputs.
+ */
+import { prisma } from "@/lib/db";
+import { predictCycle } from "@/lib/cycle";
+import {
+  toCycleInputs,
+  toDayLogInputs,
+  toProfileInput,
+} from "@/lib/cycle/engine-adapter";
+import { persistPredictionCache } from "@/lib/cycle/prediction-cache";
+import { addDays } from "@/lib/cycle/day-math";
+import { BBT_WINDOW } from "@/lib/cycle/types";
+import { DEFAULT_TIMEZONE, moodDateKey } from "@/lib/mood/date-key";
+
+/** Day-log lookback: the calendar's default past span or the symptothermal
+ *  window, whichever reaches further back. */
+const LOOKBACK_DAYS = Math.max(90, BBT_WINDOW);
+
+/** Wrist/skin-temperature lookback feeding the temperature-trend layer. */
+const TEMPERATURE_LOOKBACK_DAYS = 90;
+
+export type PredictionRefreshOutcome =
+  /** A forecast was computed and the cache row reflects it. */
+  | "persisted"
+  /** No profile row, so the account has never touched cycle tracking. */
+  | "no-profile"
+  /** Prediction is off for this account (raw-chart mode / explicit opt-out),
+   *  or the engine had nothing to forecast from. */
+  | "no-prediction";
+
+/**
+ * Recompute and persist the forecast for one account. Throws if the write
+ * fails — the caller is a job and owns the failure.
+ */
+export async function refreshPredictionCacheForUser(
+  userId: string,
+  now: Date = new Date(),
+): Promise<PredictionRefreshOutcome> {
+  const [profile, user] = await Promise.all([
+    prisma.cycleProfile.findUnique({ where: { userId } }),
+    prisma.user.findUnique({
+      where: { id: userId },
+      select: { timezone: true },
+    }),
+  ]);
+  if (!profile) return "no-profile";
+  if (!profile.predictionEnabled || profile.rawChartMode) {
+    return "no-prediction";
+  }
+
+  const tz = user?.timezone ?? DEFAULT_TIMEZONE;
+  const today = moodDateKey(now, tz);
+
+  const [cycles, dayLogs, nightlyTemps] = await Promise.all([
+    prisma.menstrualCycle.findMany({
+      where: { userId, deletedAt: null },
+      orderBy: { startDate: "asc" },
+    }),
+    prisma.cycleDayLog.findMany({
+      where: {
+        userId,
+        deletedAt: null,
+        date: { gte: addDays(today, -LOOKBACK_DAYS) },
+      },
+      orderBy: { date: "asc" },
+      select: {
+        date: true,
+        flow: true,
+        basalBodyTempC: true,
+        temperatureExcluded: true,
+        ovulationTest: true,
+        cervicalMucus: true,
+        cervixPosition: true,
+        cervixFirmness: true,
+        cervixOpening: true,
+      },
+    }),
+    prisma.measurement.findMany({
+      where: {
+        userId,
+        deletedAt: null,
+        type: "WRIST_TEMPERATURE",
+        measuredAt: {
+          gte: new Date(
+            Date.parse(
+              `${addDays(today, -TEMPERATURE_LOOKBACK_DAYS)}T00:00:00Z`,
+            ),
+          ),
+        },
+      },
+      orderBy: { measuredAt: "asc" },
+      select: { measuredAt: true, value: true },
+    }),
+  ]);
+
+  const nights = nightlyTemps.map((m) => ({
+    date: moodDateKey(m.measuredAt, tz),
+    valueC: m.value,
+  }));
+
+  const prediction = predictCycle(
+    toCycleInputs(cycles),
+    toDayLogInputs(dayLogs),
+    toProfileInput(profile),
+    today,
+    nights,
+  );
+
+  await persistPredictionCache(userId, prediction, now);
+  return "persisted";
+}

src/lib/jobs/__tests__/achievement-unlock-sweep.test.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,135 @@
+/**
+ * The nightly achievement-unlock sweep.
+ *
+ * This is where the `UserAchievement` rows are written now that
+ * `GET /api/gamification/achievements` is a pure read. Two things have to
+ * hold: the rows actually get written (a sweep that persists nothing is the
+ * silent half of a two-ended change), and the module gate the route applied
+ * still applies here — a badge whose owning module is off must never be
+ * pinned just because nobody is watching the read path any more.
+ */
+import { describe, it, expect, vi, beforeEach } from "vitest";
+
+vi.mock("@/lib/db", () => ({
+  prisma: {
+    user: { findMany: vi.fn() },
+    userAchievement: { createMany: vi.fn() },
+  },
+}));
+
+vi.mock("@/lib/modules/gate", () => ({
+  resolveModuleMap: vi.fn(async () => ({})),
+}));
+
+vi.mock("@/lib/logging/background", () => ({
+  withBackgroundEvent: async (
+    _name: string,
+    fn: (evt: { addMeta: () => void }) => Promise<unknown>,
+  ) => fn({ addMeta: () => {} }),
+}));
+
+import { prisma } from "@/lib/db";
+import { resolveModuleMap } from "@/lib/modules/gate";
+import {
+  runAchievementUnlockSweep,
+  handleAchievementUnlockSweep,
+} from "@/lib/jobs/achievement-unlock-sweep";
+
+const USERS = [
+  { id: "user-1", timezone: "Europe/Berlin" },
+  { id: "user-2", timezone: "Europe/Berlin" },
+];
+
+function resultWith(ids: string[]) {
+  return {
+    pendingUnlocks: ids.map((achievementId) => ({
+      achievementId,
+      unlockedAt: new Date("2026-07-04T10:00:00.000Z"),
+    })),
+  };
+}
+
+beforeEach(() => {
+  vi.clearAllMocks();
+  vi.mocked(prisma.user.findMany).mockResolvedValue(USERS as never);
+  vi.mocked(prisma.userAchievement.createMany).mockResolvedValue({
+    count: 1,
+  } as never);
+});
+
+describe("achievement-unlock-sweep", () => {
+  it("pins every unpinned unlock it finds", async () => {
+    const summary = await runAchievementUnlockSweep({
+      resolveModules: (async () => ({})) as never,
+      buildResult: (async () => resultWith(["mood-first"])) as never,
+    });
+
+    expect(summary.scanned).toBe(2);
+    // The count is the point: an empty sweep would satisfy "no duplicates"
+    // just as well as a working one.
+    expect(vi.mocked(prisma.userAchievement.createMany)).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(
+      2,
+    );
+    expect(summary.persisted).toBe(2);
+    expect(vi.mocked(prisma.userAchievement.createMany)).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
+      data: [
+        {
+          userId: "user-1",
+          achievementId: "mood-first",
+          unlockedAt: new Date("2026-07-04T10:00:00.000Z"),
+        },
+      ],
+      skipDuplicates: true,
+    });
+  });
+
+  it("writes nothing for an account with the achievements module off", async () => {
+    const summary = await runAchievementUnlockSweep({
+      resolveModules: (async () => ({ achievements: false })) as never,
+      buildResult: (async () => resultWith(["mood-first"])) as never,
+    });
+
+    expect(summary.skipped).toBe(2);
+    expect(summary.persisted).toBe(0);
+    expect(vi.mocked(prisma.userAchievement.createMany)).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+  });
+
+  it("keeps sweeping after one account throws and counts the failure", async () => {
+    let call = 0;
+    const summary = await runAchievementUnlockSweep({
+      resolveModules: (async () => ({})) as never,
+      buildResult: (async () => {
+        call += 1;
+        if (call === 1) throw new Error("evaluation blew up");
+        return resultWith(["mood-first"]);
+      }) as never,
+    });
+
+    expect(summary.failed).toBe(1);
+    expect(summary.persisted).toBe(1);
+    expect(vi.mocked(prisma.userAchievement.createMany)).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(
+      1,
+    );
+  });
+
+  it("fails the job when every account failed", async () => {
+    // A fault that hits every account (a dead pool, a schema drift) is
+    // systemic and must reach the operator's failing-jobs surface rather
+    // than pass quietly with a zero count.
+    vi.mocked(prisma.user.findMany).mockResolvedValue([USERS[0]] as never);
+    vi.mocked(resolveModuleMap).mockRejectedValue(new Error("pool gone"));
+
+    const outcome = await handleAchievementUnlockSweep([]);
+    expect(outcome.ok).toBe(false);
+  });
+
+  it("succeeds when there was simply nothing to pin", async () => {
+    const summary = await runAchievementUnlockSweep({
+      resolveModules: (async () => ({})) as never,
+      buildResult: (async () => resultWith([])) as never,
+    });
+    expect(summary.persisted).toBe(0);
+    expect(summary.failed).toBe(0);
+    expect(vi.mocked(prisma.userAchievement.createMany)).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+  });
+});

src/lib/jobs/__tests__/cycle-prediction-refresh.test.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,108 @@
+/**
+ * The nightly cycle-forecast refresh.
+ *
+ * `CyclePrediction` is the row the cycle-reminder cron scans, and this job is
+ * its only writer now that `GET /api/cycle/calendar` is a pure read. The
+ * property that matters is that the forecast for an account that never opens
+ * the calendar still gets written — the failure this replaces was silent in
+ * both directions (a write on a read, and a discarded promise that hid the
+ * failure).
+ */
+import { describe, it, expect, vi, beforeEach } from "vitest";
+
+vi.mock("@/lib/db", () => ({
+  prisma: { cycleProfile: { findMany: vi.fn() } },
+}));
+
+vi.mock("@/lib/cycle/gate", () => ({
+  isCycleAvailableForUser: vi.fn(async () => true),
+}));
+
+vi.mock("@/lib/cycle/prediction-refresh", () => ({
+  refreshPredictionCacheForUser: vi.fn(async () => "persisted"),
+}));
+
+vi.mock("@/lib/logging/background", () => ({
+  withBackgroundEvent: async (
+    _name: string,
+    fn: (evt: { addMeta: () => void }) => Promise<unknown>,
+  ) => fn({ addMeta: () => {} }),
+}));
+
+import { prisma } from "@/lib/db";
+import { isCycleAvailableForUser } from "@/lib/cycle/gate";
+import { refreshPredictionCacheForUser } from "@/lib/cycle/prediction-refresh";
+import {
+  runCyclePredictionRefresh,
+  handleCyclePredictionRefresh,
+} from "@/lib/jobs/cycle-prediction-refresh";
+
+const NOW = new Date("2026-07-30T02:20:00.000Z");
+
+beforeEach(() => {
+  vi.clearAllMocks();
+  vi.mocked(prisma.cycleProfile.findMany).mockResolvedValue([
+    { userId: "user-1" },
+    { userId: "user-2" },
+  ] as never);
+  vi.mocked(isCycleAvailableForUser).mockResolvedValue(true);
+  vi.mocked(refreshPredictionCacheForUser).mockResolvedValue("persisted");
+});
+
+describe("cycle-prediction-refresh", () => {
+  it("refreshes every tracking account, opened calendar or not", async () => {
+    const summary = await runCyclePredictionRefresh(NOW);
+
+    expect(summary.scanned).toBe(2);
+    // The count is the point: a cohort query that matched nothing would
+    // satisfy "no bad writes" just as well as a working sweep.
+    expect(vi.mocked(refreshPredictionCacheForUser)).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2);
+    expect(summary.refreshed).toBe(2);
+    expect(vi.mocked(refreshPredictionCacheForUser)).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
+      "user-1",
+      NOW,
+    );
+  });
+
+  it("skips an account whose cycle module is off", async () => {
+    vi.mocked(isCycleAvailableForUser).mockResolvedValue(false);
+
+    const summary = await runCyclePredictionRefresh(NOW);
+
+    expect(summary.skipped).toBe(2);
+    expect(summary.refreshed).toBe(0);
+    expect(vi.mocked(refreshPredictionCacheForUser)).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+  });
+
+  it("counts an account whose refresh throws and carries on", async () => {
+    vi.mocked(refreshPredictionCacheForUser)
+      .mockRejectedValueOnce(new Error("bad rows"))
+      .mockResolvedValueOnce("persisted");
+
+    const summary = await runCyclePredictionRefresh(NOW);
+
+    expect(summary.failed).toBe(1);
+    expect(summary.refreshed).toBe(1);
+  });
+
+  it("fails the job when every account failed", async () => {
+    // Systemic, not one account's data — it belongs on the operator's
+    // failing-jobs surface rather than passing quietly.
+    vi.mocked(prisma.cycleProfile.findMany).mockResolvedValue([
+      { userId: "user-1" },
+    ] as never);
+    vi.mocked(refreshPredictionCacheForUser).mockRejectedValue(
+      new Error("pool gone"),
+    );
+
+    const outcome = await handleCyclePredictionRefresh([]);
+    expect(outcome.ok).toBe(false);
+  });
+
+  it("succeeds when no account tracks a cycle", async () => {
+    vi.mocked(prisma.cycleProfile.findMany).mockResolvedValue([] as never);
+
+    const outcome = await handleCyclePredictionRefresh([]);
+    expect(outcome.ok).toBe(true);
+  });
+});

src/lib/jobs/__tests__/read-side-effect-queues.test.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
+/**
+ * Dead-queue guard for the two queues that took the writes off the read paths.
+ *
+ * Moving a write off a GET only works if the new owner actually runs. A queue
+ * that is not in `allQueues` is never provisioned, a schedule without a
+ * `createAndWork` binding drains into nothing, and either failure is silent:
+ * the cron fires, the job vanishes, and the only symptom is a forecast that
+ * stops moving or an unlock date that is never pinned. Both look exactly like
+ * "nothing to do".
+ *
+ * Source-text assertions over the registrar, matching the sibling
+ * `*-queue.test.ts` guards.
+ */
+import { readFileSync } from "node:fs";
+import { join } from "node:path";
+
+import { describe, expect, it } from "vitest";
+
+import { SUBSYSTEM_SURFACE } from "@/lib/jobs/subsystem-surface";
+
+const registrar = readFileSync(
+  join(__dirname, "..", "reminder", "register-maintenance.ts"),
+  "utf8",
+);
+
+const allQueues = registrar.match(/const allQueues\s*=\s*\[([\s\S]*?)\n\];/);
+
+const QUEUES = [
+  {
+    label: "cycle-prediction-refresh",
+    binding: "CYCLE_PREDICTION_REFRESH_QUEUE",
+    cron: "CYCLE_PREDICTION_REFRESH_CRON",
+    handler: "handleCyclePredictionRefresh",
+    name: "cycle-prediction-refresh",
+  },
+  {
+    label: "achievement-unlock-sweep",
+    binding: "ACHIEVEMENT_UNLOCK_SWEEP_QUEUE",
+    cron: "ACHIEVEMENT_UNLOCK_SWEEP_CRON",
+    handler: "handleAchievementUnlockSweep",
+    name: "achievement-unlock-sweep",
+  },
+];
+
+describe("queues that own a write moved off a GET", () => {
+  it("extracted an allQueues list to assert against", () => {
+    // The regexes below all read from this capture; if it ever stops
+    // matching, every assertion in this file would pass on an empty string.
+    expect(allQueues).not.toBeNull();
+    expect(allQueues![1].length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
+  });
+
+  for (const queue of QUEUES) {
+    describe(queue.label, () => {
+      it("is provisioned in the allQueues list", () => {
+        expect(allQueues![1]).toMatch(new RegExp(`\\b${queue.binding}\\b`));
+      });
+
+      it("carries a cron schedule", () => {
+        expect(registrar).toMatch(
+          new RegExp(`\\[\\s*${queue.binding},\\s*${queue.cron}`),
+        );
+      });
+
+      it("binds a createAndWork handler that drains it", () => {
+        expect(registrar).toMatch(
+          new RegExp(
+            `createAndWork[\\s\\S]{0,200}${queue.binding}[\\s\\S]{0,200}${queue.handler}`,
+          ),
+        );
+      });
+
+      it("declares a failure audience", () => {
+        expect(Object.keys(SUBSYSTEM_SURFACE)).toContain(queue.name);
+      });
+    });
+  }
+});

src/lib/jobs/achievement-unlock-sweep.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,134 @@
+/**
+ * Nightly sweep that pins newly unlocked achievements.
+ *
+ * An unlock date is derived from the account's own history, so the badge
+ * grid renders correctly whether or not a `UserAchievement` row exists — the
+ * row is what makes the DATE durable once the underlying rows move, and it
+ * is what the backup carries ("the date is the part that cannot be
+ * recovered").
+ *
+ * Until v1.35.3 the only thing that wrote those rows was
+ * `GET /api/gamification/achievements`. That made a durable record a side
+ * effect of somebody looking at a page: an account that earned a badge and
+ * never opened the app pinned nothing, and a read carried an INSERT that an
+ * MCP-audience read token would have been admitted on the moment any route
+ * declared a narrow scope. The evaluation is unchanged and still runs on the
+ * read; only the persistence moved here, where it covers every account
+ * rather than the ones that happened to look.
+ *
+ * The date written is the computed completion date, not the sweep's own
+ * clock, so a badge pinned tonight and the same badge pinned a week from now
+ * carry the identical timestamp. Running late costs nothing but exposure to
+ * a data edit in between.
+ *
+ * Runs at 04:25 Europe/Berlin, after the cycle-prediction refresh (04:20).
+ */
+import type { Job } from "pg-boss";
+
+import { jobDone, jobFailed, type JobOutcome } from "@/lib/jobs/job-outcome";
+import { withBackgroundEvent } from "@/lib/logging/background";
+import { resolveModuleMap } from "@/lib/modules/gate";
+import { buildAchievementsResult } from "@/lib/gamification/achievements-result";
+import { getWorkerPrisma } from "./reminder/shared";
+
+export const ACHIEVEMENT_UNLOCK_SWEEP_QUEUE = "achievement-unlock-sweep";
+
+export const ACHIEVEMENT_UNLOCK_SWEEP_CRON = "25 4 * * *";
+
+export interface AchievementUnlockSweepPayload {
+  triggeredAt: string;
+}
+
+export interface AchievementUnlockSweepSummary {
+  /** Accounts the sweep looked at. */
+  scanned: number;
+  /** Accounts with the achievements module off. */
+  skipped: number;
+  /** Unlock rows written across every account. */
+  persisted: number;
+  /** Accounts whose evaluation or write threw. */
+  failed: number;
+}
+
+/**
+ * Pin every unpinned unlock across all accounts. Exported for the test; the
+ * handler below is the queue binding.
+ */
+export async function runAchievementUnlockSweep(
+  options: {
+    resolveModules?: typeof resolveModuleMap;
+    buildResult?: typeof buildAchievementsResult;
+  } = {},
+): Promise<AchievementUnlockSweepSummary> {
+  const resolveModules = options.resolveModules ?? resolveModuleMap;
+  const buildResult = options.buildResult ?? buildAchievementsResult;
+  const prisma = getWorkerPrisma();
+
+  const users = await prisma.user.findMany({ orderBy: { id: "asc" } });
+
+  const summary: AchievementUnlockSweepSummary = {
+    scanned: users.length,
+    skipped: 0,
+    persisted: 0,
+    failed: 0,
+  };
+
+  for (const user of users) {
+    try {
+      const moduleMap = await resolveModules(user.id);
+      // Same gate the route applies: an account with the module off gets no
+      // badge evaluation and no unlock persistence.
+      if (moduleMap.achievements === false) {
+        summary.skipped += 1;
+        continue;
+      }
+
+      const result = await buildResult(user, moduleMap);
+      if (result.pendingUnlocks.length === 0) continue;
+
+      // Idempotent on the `(userId, achievementId)` unique, so a re-run
+      // against an already-pinned badge is a no-op rather than a duplicate.
+      const written = await prisma.userAchievement.createMany({
+        data: result.pendingUnlocks.map((u) => ({
+          userId: user.id,
+          achievementId: u.achievementId,
+          unlockedAt: new Date(u.unlockedAt),
+        })),
+        skipDuplicates: true,
+      });
+      summary.persisted += written.count;
+    } catch {
+      // One account's evaluation must not cost every other account its
+      // pinned dates. The count is what makes a systemic failure visible.
+      summary.failed += 1;
+    }
+  }
+
+  return summary;
+}
+
+export async function handleAchievementUnlockSweep(
+  jobs: Job<AchievementUnlockSweepPayload>[],
+): Promise<JobOutcome> {
+  void jobs;
+  return withBackgroundEvent("job.achievement_unlock_sweep", async (evt) => {
+    const summary = await runAchievementUnlockSweep();
+    evt.addMeta("achievement_sweep_scanned", summary.scanned);
+    evt.addMeta("achievement_sweep_skipped", summary.skipped);
+    evt.addMeta("achievement_sweep_persisted", summary.persisted);
+    evt.addMeta("achievement_sweep_failed", summary.failed);
+
+    // Every account failing is a systemic fault, not one account's data.
+    if (summary.failed > 0 && summary.failed === summary.scanned) {
+      return jobFailed(
+        `achievement-unlock-sweep failed for all ${summary.failed} accounts`,
+      );
+    }
+    return jobDone({
+      users_scanned: summary.scanned,
+      skipped: summary.skipped,
+      persisted: summary.persisted,
+      users_failed: summary.failed,
+    });
+  });
+}

src/lib/jobs/cycle-prediction-refresh.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,121 @@
+/**
+ * Nightly refresh of the `CyclePrediction` forecast rows.
+ *
+ * The cycle-reminder cron scans `CyclePrediction` to decide who is due a
+ * period-soon or fertile-soon push. Until v1.35.3 those rows were written
+ * only as a side effect of `GET /api/cycle/calendar`, so an account that
+ * tracked its cycle but never opened the calendar page was scanned against a
+ * forecast made from whatever its data looked like the last time somebody
+ * looked — or was never scanned at all. Moving the write here makes the
+ * reminder's input a function of the account's data instead of its browsing.
+ *
+ * Cohort: accounts that hold a `CycleProfile` with prediction not explicitly
+ * off, resolved through the same two-layer cycle gate the routes use, so an
+ * operator-disabled module refreshes nothing. Per-account failures are
+ * counted and the pass continues; a pass that failed for every account it
+ * touched fails the job so the operator sees it.
+ *
+ * Runs at 04:20 Europe/Berlin, after the 03:xx retention block. The forecast
+ * moves on a day scale and the reminder windows are days wide, so a fixed
+ * server-side hour is close enough for every timezone the cohort spans.
+ */
+import type { Job } from "pg-boss";
+
+import { jobDone, jobFailed, type JobOutcome } from "@/lib/jobs/job-outcome";
+import { withBackgroundEvent } from "@/lib/logging/background";
+import { isCycleAvailableForUser } from "@/lib/cycle/gate";
+import { refreshPredictionCacheForUser } from "@/lib/cycle/prediction-refresh";
+import { getWorkerPrisma } from "./reminder/shared";
+
+export const CYCLE_PREDICTION_REFRESH_QUEUE = "cycle-prediction-refresh";
+
+export const CYCLE_PREDICTION_REFRESH_CRON = "20 4 * * *";
+
+export interface CyclePredictionRefreshPayload {
+  triggeredAt: string;
+}
+
+export interface CyclePredictionRefreshSummary {
+  /** Profiles the cohort query returned. */
+  scanned: number;
+  /** Accounts whose forecast row now reflects their data. */
+  refreshed: number;
+  /** Accounts skipped: module off, prediction off, or raw-chart mode. */
+  skipped: number;
+  /** Accounts whose refresh threw. */
+  failed: number;
+}
+
+/**
+ * Refresh every eligible account's forecast. Exported for the test; the
+ * handler below is the queue binding.
+ */
+export async function runCyclePredictionRefresh(
+  now: Date = new Date(),
+  options: {
+    isAvailable?: typeof isCycleAvailableForUser;
+    refresh?: typeof refreshPredictionCacheForUser;
+  } = {},
+): Promise<CyclePredictionRefreshSummary> {
+  const isAvailable = options.isAvailable ?? isCycleAvailableForUser;
+  const refresh = options.refresh ?? refreshPredictionCacheForUser;
+  const prisma = getWorkerPrisma();
+
+  const profiles = await prisma.cycleProfile.findMany({
+    where: { NOT: { predictionEnabled: false } },
+    select: { userId: true },
+  });
+
+  const summary: CyclePredictionRefreshSummary = {
+    scanned: profiles.length,
+    refreshed: 0,
+    skipped: 0,
+    failed: 0,
+  };
+
+  for (const { userId } of profiles) {
+    try {
+      if (!(await isAvailable(userId))) {
+        summary.skipped += 1;
+        continue;
+      }
+      const outcome = await refresh(userId, now);
+      if (outcome === "persisted") summary.refreshed += 1;
+      else summary.skipped += 1;
+    } catch {
+      // One account's bad data must not cost every other account its
+      // reminders. The count is what makes a systemic failure visible.
+      summary.failed += 1;
+    }
+  }
+
+  return summary;
+}
+
+export async function handleCyclePredictionRefresh(
+  jobs: Job<CyclePredictionRefreshPayload>[],
+): Promise<JobOutcome> {
+  void jobs;
+  return withBackgroundEvent("job.cycle_prediction_refresh", async (evt) => {
+    const summary = await runCyclePredictionRefresh();
+    evt.addMeta("cycle_prediction_scanned", summary.scanned);
+    evt.addMeta("cycle_prediction_refreshed", summary.refreshed);
+    evt.addMeta("cycle_prediction_skipped", summary.skipped);
+    evt.addMeta("cycle_prediction_failed", summary.failed);
+
+    // Every account failing is a systemic fault (a dead pool, a schema drift),
+    // not one account's bad data. Anything short of that stays a success with
+    // the count on the event.
+    if (summary.failed > 0 && summary.failed === summary.scanned) {
+      return jobFailed(
+        `cycle-prediction-refresh failed for all ${summary.failed} accounts`,
+      );
+    }
+    return jobDone({
+      users_scanned: summary.scanned,
+      refreshed: summary.refreshed,
+      skipped: summary.skipped,
+      users_failed: summary.failed,
+    });
+  });
+}

src/lib/jobs/reminder/register-maintenance.ts

@@ -189,6 +189,18 @@ import {
   handleDocumentPurge,
   type DocumentPurgePayload,
 } from "@/lib/jobs/document-purge";
+import {
+  CYCLE_PREDICTION_REFRESH_QUEUE,
+  CYCLE_PREDICTION_REFRESH_CRON,
+  handleCyclePredictionRefresh,
+  type CyclePredictionRefreshPayload,
+} from "@/lib/jobs/cycle-prediction-refresh";
+import {
+  ACHIEVEMENT_UNLOCK_SWEEP_QUEUE,
+  ACHIEVEMENT_UNLOCK_SWEEP_CRON,
+  handleAchievementUnlockSweep,
+  type AchievementUnlockSweepPayload,
+} from "@/lib/jobs/achievement-unlock-sweep";
 
 const DATA_BACKUP_QUEUE = "data-backup";
 
@@ -349,6 +361,13 @@ const allQueues = [
   // v1.31.0 — data-arrival reaction-marker prune. Without this entry the
   // daily schedule silently no-ops and the markers accumulate forever.
   ARRIVAL_REACTION_CLEANUP_QUEUE,
+  // v1.35.3 — nightly refresh of the cycle forecast rows the reminder cron
+  // scans. Without this entry the schedule silently no-ops and the forecast
+  // is only as fresh as the last time somebody opened the calendar.
+  CYCLE_PREDICTION_REFRESH_QUEUE,
+  // v1.35.3 — nightly pin for newly unlocked achievements. Without this entry
+  // the schedule silently no-ops and no unlock date is ever made durable.
+  ACHIEVEMENT_UNLOCK_SWEEP_QUEUE,
   // v1.7.0 — soft-deleted measurement tombstone prune. Without this entry
   // the daily schedule silently no-ops and pruned-past-retention tombstones
   // pile up forever.
@@ -494,6 +513,22 @@ const schedules: ScheduleEntry[] = [
   [NOTE_ENCRYPTION_BACKFILL_QUEUE, NOTE_ENCRYPTION_BACKFILL_CRON],
   // v1.24 — daily 04:00 Europe/Berlin prune for dead MCP connector tokens.
   [MCP_TOKEN_CLEANUP_QUEUE, MCP_TOKEN_CLEANUP_CRON, cronIsTheRetry],
+  // v1.35.3 — daily 04:20 Europe/Berlin refresh of the cycle forecast rows
+  // the reminder cron scans. Tomorrow's tick is the retry: the forecast moves
+  // on a day scale and the reminder windows are days wide.
+  [
+    CYCLE_PREDICTION_REFRESH_QUEUE,
+    CYCLE_PREDICTION_REFRESH_CRON,
+    cronIsTheRetry,
+  ],
+  // v1.35.3 — daily 04:25 Europe/Berlin pin for newly unlocked achievements.
+  // Tomorrow's tick is the retry: the date written is the computed completion
+  // date, so a night late writes the identical row.
+  [
+    ACHIEVEMENT_UNLOCK_SWEEP_QUEUE,
+    ACHIEVEMENT_UNLOCK_SWEEP_CRON,
+    cronIsTheRetry,
+  ],
   // v1.25 — daily 04:05 Europe/Berlin medication-note encryption backfill
   // discovery. The empty cron payload (no `userId`) is the handler's signal to
   // fan out one per-user job per account still holding a plaintext medication
@@ -699,6 +734,24 @@ export async function registerMaintenanceQueues(
     { localConcurrency: 1 },
     handleArrivalReactionCleanup,
   );
+  // v1.35.3 — nightly cycle-forecast refresh. Single-flight: two ticks
+  // recomputing the same cohort is wasted work and the second upsert is a
+  // no-op against the debounce.
+  await createAndWork<CyclePredictionRefreshPayload>(
+    boss,
+    CYCLE_PREDICTION_REFRESH_QUEUE,
+    { localConcurrency: 1 },
+    handleCyclePredictionRefresh,
+  );
+  // v1.35.3 — nightly achievement-unlock pin. Single-flight: the underlying
+  // createMany is idempotent on the (userId, achievementId) unique, so a
+  // second concurrent tick would only re-walk the same accounts.
+  await createAndWork<AchievementUnlockSweepPayload>(
+    boss,
+    ACHIEVEMENT_UNLOCK_SWEEP_QUEUE,
+    { localConcurrency: 1 },
+    handleAchievementUnlockSweep,
+  );
   // v1.7.0 — daily prune of expired measurement tombstones. Single-flight
   // like every other cleanup queue.
   await createAndWork<MeasurementTombstoneCleanupPayload>(

src/lib/jobs/subsystem-surface.ts

@@ -116,6 +116,8 @@ const subsystemSurface = {
   "mood-reminder-cleanup": { audience: "system" },
   "push-attempt-cleanup": { audience: "system" },
   "arrival-reaction-cleanup": { audience: "system" },
+  "cycle-prediction-refresh": { audience: "system" },
+  "achievement-unlock-sweep": { audience: "system" },
   "measurement-tombstone-cleanup": { audience: "system" },
   "coach-message-cleanup": { audience: "system" },
   "note-encryption-backfill": { audience: "system" },

src/lib/openapi/routes/sync.ts

@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ const syncStateResponse = z
   .meta({
     id: "SyncStateResponse",
     description:
-      "iOS SyncMode handshake. Each GET also advances the server-side `lastSyncedAt` checkpoint and returns the previous value. The cheap 'should I sync?' summary; the durable delta cursor lives on `/api/sync/changes`.",
+      "iOS SyncMode handshake. Reports the server-side `lastSyncedAt` checkpoint, which the batch ingest endpoints set when a client push lands; the handshake itself writes nothing. The cheap 'should I sync?' summary; the durable delta cursor lives on `/api/sync/changes`.",
   });
 
 const syncMeasurementUpsert = measurementResource
@@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ export const syncPaths: NonNullable<ZodOpenApiObject["paths"]> = {
       tags: ["Sync"],
       summary: "Sync handshake + window metadata",
       description:
-        "Cheap 'should I sync?' summary. Returns the previous `lastSyncedAt` checkpoint and advances it server-side on each call. The `sync` block carries the incremental-delta window + tombstone retention so the client reads them rather than hardcoding.",
+        "Cheap 'should I sync?' summary. Returns the `lastSyncedAt` checkpoint, which the batch ingest endpoints advance when a client push lands; this route is a read and writes nothing. The `sync` block carries the incremental-delta window + tombstone retention so the client reads them rather than hardcoding.",
       responses: {
         "200": {
           description: "Sync state summary.",

src/lib/sync/checkpoint.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+/**
+ * The SyncMode checkpoint — `User.lastSyncedAt`.
+ *
+ * One writer contract: the checkpoint is stamped by the client-push ingest
+ * boundaries (the measurement / mood / intake batch endpoints), never by the
+ * handshake that reports it. `GET /api/sync/state` is the only reader, so the
+ * column has to describe a sync that actually moved data rather than the fact
+ * that a client asked what the server knows.
+ *
+ * Stamping it on the handshake was also unsafe in exactly the watermark sense
+ * the provider pipelines already guard against (`sync-measure-watermark`,
+ * `sync-dead-token`): it advanced the checkpoint past a window the client had
+ * not drained yet, and a client that trusts the checkpoint then skips that
+ * window. Under-advancing a watermark costs a redundant fetch; over-advancing
+ * loses rows. Stamped here, the checkpoint can only ever trail the truth.
+ */
+import { prisma } from "@/lib/db";
+import { annotate } from "@/lib/logging/context";
+
+/**
+ * Stamp `User.lastSyncedAt`. Call from an ingest boundary once the batch has
+ * reached a durable verdict — never from a read.
+ */
+export async function markSyncCheckpoint(
+  userId: string,
+  at: Date = new Date(),
+): Promise<void> {
+  await prisma.user.update({
+    where: { id: userId },
+    data: { lastSyncedAt: at },
+  });
+  annotate({ meta: { sync_checkpoint_at: at.toISOString() } });
+}