Two readings, side by side, never merged. The person's own rating leads
— larger, first, and returned exactly as it was stored — and the
comparison sits beside it with its range and the number of days it was
built from. The deviation is measured against the range, not against its
midpoint: inside it is a day that went as the account's own past days
suggest, and only outside it is worth a sentence.
The sentence is a counterfactual and says so. Never "your mood is 5.4",
always "a value around 5.4 would have been expected". The explanation
names what the comparison weighted for that day, out of what the job
stored for that day, in the words the capture sheet already uses — a
person reads "Workload" here because that is what the slider they moved
was called.
The route declares the whole record rather than the mind section, and
the reason is written at the declaration: the comparison reads the day's
context AND the figures the sleep, activity and recovery modules hold,
and it names them, so a delegate holding only the mind section would
receive a derived view of sections the owner declined to share. A scoped
grant is refused outright rather than served a contribution list with
the linked features quietly removed, which would read as "only the mood
fields mattered" and be false.
The causal-verb ban is a test now rather than a review habit: the copy
guard reads all six bundles and fails on a causal construction in any of
them, and on a statement that quotes a value without the days behind it.
Both halves were watched failing.
Marc-André Bombeck
f48afed82d