Marc-André Bombeck a8d798442f fix(environment): name the enum type the database actually has ...

Migration 0217 created the type as `environment_location_source`; the
datamodel declared `EnvironmentLocationSource` with no `@@map`, so the client
compiled every write against `public."EnvironmentLocationSource"`. Postgres
answered 42704, the upsert rolled the transaction back, and the module sat at
"0 days recorded" from the day it shipped — one enum out of forty-nine, and the
only one without a map.

No migration follows. `prisma migrate diff` against a database built from the
committed migrations reports the enum rename and the `environment_contexts.source`
column rebuild before the map and nothing after it: the database was never the
side that drifted, and renaming a live type to match a datamodel typo would be
the wrong direction.

Two guards, because the two questions are different. The unit guard replays
CREATE TYPE / ALTER TYPE RENAME / DROP TYPE across the migration set and holds
every enum to a type that survives it. The integration guard compares all three
name classes Prisma emits — enum type, table, column — against a real migrated
Postgres, which is the only place a name mismatch is observable at all: it
survives generation, typecheck, and every mocked test untouched.

Refs #646

2026-07-26 14:37:57 +02:00

..

integration

fix(environment): name the enum type the database actually has

2026-07-26 14:37:57 +02:00