mirror of
https://github.com/MBombeck/HealthLog.git
synced 2026-11-08 20:42:43 +00:00
Four structural guards freeze the invariants the change rests on: the set of files that can resolve a Bearer token to a user, the single deliberate any-valid-token posture, the mint sites with their scope sets, and the rule that a declared scope is an exported constant rather than a literal. Thirteen behavioural cases run against a real Postgres and the real resolver. Four of them go red on the pre-fix tree — a narrow token reading the full-backup export and the labs surface, and an MCP token on a REST read. The rest pin the flows that must NOT change: the per-medication ingest pair still works, the token without the per-medication grant is still refused, a wildcard token still reaches the export and the batch ingest, an MCP token still resolves on /mcp with its write scope intact, a declared fhir:read still opens the FHIR face and nothing else, cookie sessions are unaffected, and requireAdmin still refuses a wildcard Bearer. The workout-batch case that asserted narrow tokens are admitted claimed the iOS sync depended on it. It does not: workouts:ingest has no mint site anywhere, and iOS holds a ["*"] token. Replaced with a case that asserts both halves of the real contract. Documentation updated for the enforcement rule and the retired mint.
323 lines
12 KiB
TypeScript
323 lines
12 KiB
TypeScript
/**
|
|
* Behavioural suite for the fail-closed Bearer-scope default, against a real
|
|
* Postgres and the real resolver — no mocked Prisma, no mocked `requireAuth`.
|
|
*
|
|
* The gap this pins: `requireAuth()` enforced a token's scope only when the
|
|
* route passed one, and 324 of 330 route files pass none. A token minted for
|
|
* medication intake therefore reached the full-backup export, the labs surface,
|
|
* the coach, and the bulk deletes. B1 is the direct regression test — it fails
|
|
* on the pre-fix tree.
|
|
*
|
|
* Seven cases against 300-odd routes prove nothing about the other routes by
|
|
* enumeration. The guarantee for those is structural (one resolution path, one
|
|
* authorisation arm) and is held by
|
|
* `src/__tests__/bearer-scope-enforcement-guard.test.ts`. What these cases do
|
|
* is prove the arm itself behaves, end to end, for every credential shape the
|
|
* app actually mints.
|
|
*/
|
|
import { beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
|
|
import { NextRequest } from "next/server";
|
|
|
|
import { cookieJar, headerJar } from "./mock-next-headers";
|
|
import { getPrismaClient, truncateAllTables } from "./setup";
|
|
|
|
process.env.API_TOKEN_HMAC_KEY ??=
|
|
"test-hmac-key-bearer-scope-enforcement-32-bytes-min-0987654321";
|
|
|
|
const { hashToken } = await import("@/lib/auth/hmac");
|
|
|
|
const USER_ID = "user-bearer-scope-test";
|
|
|
|
vi.mock("next/headers", async () => {
|
|
const { cookieJar, headerJar } = await import("./mock-next-headers");
|
|
return {
|
|
headers: vi.fn(async () => ({
|
|
get: (name: string) => headerJar.get(name.toLowerCase()) ?? null,
|
|
})),
|
|
cookies: vi.fn(async () => ({
|
|
get: (name: string) => {
|
|
const value = cookieJar.get(name);
|
|
return value ? { name, value } : undefined;
|
|
},
|
|
set: (name: string, value: string) => {
|
|
cookieJar.set(name, value);
|
|
},
|
|
delete: (name: string) => {
|
|
cookieJar.delete(name);
|
|
},
|
|
})),
|
|
};
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
vi.mock("@/lib/db-compat", () => ({
|
|
ensureDbCompatibility: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue(undefined),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
beforeEach(async () => {
|
|
await truncateAllTables(getPrismaClient());
|
|
cookieJar.clear();
|
|
headerJar.clear();
|
|
await getPrismaClient().user.create({
|
|
data: {
|
|
id: USER_ID,
|
|
username: "bearer-scope",
|
|
email: "bearer-scope@example.test",
|
|
timezone: "UTC",
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
/** Mint a real `ApiToken` row with the given scopes and arm the Bearer header. */
|
|
async function useToken(permissions: string[], label = "t"): Promise<string> {
|
|
const raw = `hlk_${label}_${"0".repeat(48)}`;
|
|
await getPrismaClient().apiToken.create({
|
|
data: {
|
|
userId: USER_ID,
|
|
name: label,
|
|
tokenHash: hashToken(raw),
|
|
permissions,
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
headerJar.set("authorization", `Bearer ${raw}`);
|
|
return raw;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/** Arm a real cookie session instead of a Bearer token. */
|
|
async function useCookieSession(): Promise<void> {
|
|
const session = await getPrismaClient().session.create({
|
|
data: { userId: USER_ID, expiresAt: new Date(Date.now() + 3_600_000) },
|
|
});
|
|
cookieJar.set("healthlog_session", session.id);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function req(path: string, method = "GET"): NextRequest {
|
|
const init: RequestInit = { method };
|
|
const raw = headerJar.get("authorization");
|
|
if (raw) init.headers = { authorization: raw };
|
|
return new NextRequest(`https://health.example${path}`, init as never);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/** The most recent `auth.bearer.failure` audit row's machine reason. */
|
|
async function lastBearerFailureReason(): Promise<string | undefined> {
|
|
const row = await getPrismaClient().auditLog.findFirst({
|
|
where: { action: "auth.bearer.failure" },
|
|
orderBy: { createdAt: "desc" },
|
|
});
|
|
if (!row?.details) return undefined;
|
|
return (JSON.parse(row.details) as { reason?: string }).reason;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
describe("B1 — a narrow token cannot read the full-account export", () => {
|
|
it("refuses ['medication:ingest'] on GET /api/export/full-backup with 403", async () => {
|
|
// The vulnerability in one request: this is the token the settings card
|
|
// told users to hand to third-party automations, reading every row the
|
|
// account holds.
|
|
await useToken(["medication:ingest"], "narrow");
|
|
const { GET } = await import("@/app/api/export/full-backup/route");
|
|
|
|
const res = await GET(req("/api/export/full-backup"));
|
|
|
|
expect(res.status).toBe(403);
|
|
const json = (await res.json()) as { data: null; error: string };
|
|
expect(json.data).toBeNull();
|
|
expect(json.error).toBe("Insufficient permissions");
|
|
|
|
// The break is visible AND attributable: an operator can name the token.
|
|
// Audit writes are fire-and-forget; give the microtask a beat to land.
|
|
await new Promise((r) => setTimeout(r, 100));
|
|
expect(await lastBearerFailureReason()).toBe("undeclared_scope");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("refuses the same token on GET /api/labs with 403", async () => {
|
|
await useToken(["medication:ingest"], "narrow2");
|
|
const { GET } = await import("@/app/api/labs/route");
|
|
const res = await GET(req("/api/labs"));
|
|
expect(res.status).toBe(403);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe("B2/B3 — the medication-ingest surface is unchanged", () => {
|
|
async function seedMedication(): Promise<string> {
|
|
const med = await getPrismaClient().medication.create({
|
|
data: { userId: USER_ID, name: "Test Med", dose: "1 mg" },
|
|
});
|
|
return med.id;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
it("B2 — the per-medication token still ingests", async () => {
|
|
// The credential that actually performs medication intake. It never
|
|
// touches `requireAuth` — `/api/ingest/medication` hand-rolls the whole
|
|
// resolution — so the fail-closed default cannot reach it. This is the
|
|
// one flow a fail-closed default could plausibly have broken.
|
|
const medId = await seedMedication();
|
|
await useToken(["medication:ingest", `medication:${medId}:ingest`], "pair");
|
|
const { POST } = await import("@/app/api/ingest/medication/route");
|
|
|
|
const request = new NextRequest(
|
|
"https://health.example/api/ingest/medication",
|
|
{
|
|
method: "POST",
|
|
headers: {
|
|
authorization: headerJar.get("authorization")!,
|
|
"content-type": "application/json",
|
|
},
|
|
body: JSON.stringify({
|
|
medicationName: "Test Med",
|
|
idempotencyKey: "bearer-scope-b2",
|
|
}),
|
|
} as never,
|
|
);
|
|
const res = await POST(request);
|
|
|
|
expect([200, 201]).toContain(res.status);
|
|
const events = await getPrismaClient().medicationIntakeEvent.count({
|
|
where: { userId: USER_ID },
|
|
});
|
|
expect(events).toBe(1);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("B3 — a token without the per-medication grant is still refused", async () => {
|
|
// The pre-existing second gate. This is why the retired `/api/tokens`
|
|
// mint never worked for its advertised purpose.
|
|
await seedMedication();
|
|
await useToken(["medication:ingest"], "familyonly");
|
|
const { POST } = await import("@/app/api/ingest/medication/route");
|
|
|
|
const request = new NextRequest(
|
|
"https://health.example/api/ingest/medication",
|
|
{
|
|
method: "POST",
|
|
headers: {
|
|
authorization: headerJar.get("authorization")!,
|
|
"content-type": "application/json",
|
|
},
|
|
body: JSON.stringify({
|
|
medicationName: "Test Med",
|
|
idempotencyKey: "bearer-scope-b3",
|
|
}),
|
|
} as never,
|
|
);
|
|
const res = await POST(request);
|
|
|
|
expect(res.status).toBe(403);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe("B4 — the native client is not broken", () => {
|
|
it("admits a ['*'] token on GET /api/export/full-backup", async () => {
|
|
// Login, passkey login-verify and refresh rotation all mint `["*"]`, so
|
|
// this is exactly the credential the iOS app holds. If this case ever
|
|
// goes red, the native client is down.
|
|
await useToken(["*"], "wildcard");
|
|
const { GET } = await import("@/app/api/export/full-backup/route");
|
|
const res = await GET(req("/api/export/full-backup"));
|
|
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("admits a ['*'] token on a batch ingest route", async () => {
|
|
await useToken(["*"], "wildcardbatch");
|
|
const { POST } = await import("@/app/api/measurements/batch/route");
|
|
const request = new NextRequest(
|
|
"https://health.example/api/measurements/batch",
|
|
{
|
|
method: "POST",
|
|
headers: {
|
|
authorization: headerJar.get("authorization")!,
|
|
"content-type": "application/json",
|
|
},
|
|
body: JSON.stringify({
|
|
entries: [
|
|
{
|
|
hkIdentifier: "HKQuantityTypeIdentifierBodyMass",
|
|
value: 70,
|
|
unit: "kg",
|
|
startDate: new Date().toISOString(),
|
|
endDate: new Date().toISOString(),
|
|
externalId: "uuid-bearer-scope-1",
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
}),
|
|
} as never,
|
|
);
|
|
const res = await POST(request);
|
|
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe("B5 — an MCP token is audience-bound to /mcp", () => {
|
|
it("refuses ['health:read'] on a REST read", async () => {
|
|
// Narrowing, not breakage: the token's REST read leg was never a feature
|
|
// an MCP client used. Its audience is now /mcp alone.
|
|
await useToken(["health:read"], "mcpread");
|
|
const { GET } = await import("@/app/api/export/full-backup/route");
|
|
const res = await GET(req("/api/export/full-backup"));
|
|
expect(res.status).toBe(403);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("still resolves the same token on the /mcp wire", async () => {
|
|
const raw = await useToken(["health:read"], "mcpread2");
|
|
const { resolveMcpAuthContext } = await import("@/lib/mcp/auth");
|
|
|
|
const ctx = await resolveMcpAuthContext(raw);
|
|
|
|
expect(ctx.userId).toBe(USER_ID);
|
|
expect(ctx.canRead).toBe(true);
|
|
// Read-only token: the write tools stay shut.
|
|
expect(ctx.canWrite).toBe(false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("grants write on /mcp only for a consented health:write token", async () => {
|
|
const raw = await useToken(["health:read", "health:write"], "mcprw");
|
|
const { resolveMcpAuthContext } = await import("@/lib/mcp/auth");
|
|
const ctx = await resolveMcpAuthContext(raw);
|
|
expect(ctx.canWrite).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe("B6 — a declared scope grants only what it names", () => {
|
|
it("admits ['fhir:read'] on the FHIR face", async () => {
|
|
await useToken(["fhir:read"], "fhir");
|
|
const { GET } = await import("@/app/api/fhir/Observation/route");
|
|
const res = await GET(req("/api/fhir/Observation"));
|
|
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("refuses the same token on /api/labs, which declares no scope", async () => {
|
|
// The whole point of the inversion: holding a scope buys the routes that
|
|
// name it, and nothing else.
|
|
await useToken(["fhir:read"], "fhir2");
|
|
const { GET } = await import("@/app/api/labs/route");
|
|
const res = await GET(req("/api/labs"));
|
|
expect(res.status).toBe(403);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe("B7 — cookie sessions are untouched", () => {
|
|
it("reaches every route the narrow token was refused on", async () => {
|
|
await useCookieSession();
|
|
|
|
const backup = await import("@/app/api/export/full-backup/route");
|
|
expect((await backup.GET(req("/api/export/full-backup"))).status).toBe(200);
|
|
|
|
const labs = await import("@/app/api/labs/route");
|
|
expect((await labs.GET(req("/api/labs"))).status).toBe(200);
|
|
|
|
const fhir = await import("@/app/api/fhir/Observation/route");
|
|
expect((await fhir.GET(req("/api/fhir/Observation"))).status).toBe(200);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("requireAdmin still refuses a ['*'] Bearer token", async () => {
|
|
// The cookie-only property of `requireAdmin()` is orthogonal to this
|
|
// change and must stay orthogonal. A wildcard token is the strongest
|
|
// Bearer credential the app mints and it still cannot elevate.
|
|
await getPrismaClient().user.update({
|
|
where: { id: USER_ID },
|
|
data: { role: "ADMIN" },
|
|
});
|
|
await useToken(["*"], "adminwild");
|
|
|
|
const { requireAdmin, HttpError } = await import("@/lib/api-handler");
|
|
await expect(requireAdmin()).rejects.toBeInstanceOf(HttpError);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|