Marc-André Bombeck 4d2f706dad feat(doctor-report): a report can mention a visit, and know why it exists ...

The VISITS leaf ships in the release that made a visit possible, because a
selectable checkbox that produces nothing is worse than no checkbox. Leaf,
collector and PDF renderer land together, and the leaf carries no LEAF_MODULE
entry — like ALLERGIES beside it — because a visit is core and the whole report
is already gated by doctorReport. The absence is commented at the map so a
later reader does not read it as an oversight.

The rows print the date, the practice with its specialty, the kind, the reason,
the outcome and the conditions the visit was filed against. The two encrypted
columns decrypt at render, fail-soft, and never enter the stored selection. A
condition the person has since deleted is not named: the link row survives a
soft delete, and printing a label they withdrew would put it in front of a
doctor.

No FHIR resource type is added. That deferral is already written at the
Encounter model, and the bundle builder now says so at the point a reader would
look for the missing section: FHIR splits the future from the past across
Appointment and Encounter, which is a serialisation question this release does
not answer.

Two properties are free and worth stating: a stored selection never grows
(unknown ids drop) and a clinician share link's sections are frozen write-once,
so no existing report and no already-shared link gains a section.

The panel also offers a booked visit as the report's reason — one query, one
prefilled window end, one dismissible offer that names its own source and never
applies itself. A window control that moves on its own is what makes an export
panel untrustworthy.

2026-08-08 14:38:26 +02:00

1.4 MiB

Raw Blame History