Marc-André Bombeck 3ae5bfe1c0 Capture the schemas that annotated themselves into nothing ...

`.meta()` clones the schema in Zod 4 and registers the clone, so a bare
`schema.meta({ id, description })` statement registers nothing at all.
Forty-one of them sat across nine route modules. The ids they named —
`MeasurementType`, `MeasurementSource`, `LoginPasswordRequest`,
`CreateMeasurementRequest`, `CreateBatchWorkoutRequest` and thirty more —
reached `components.schemas` zero times, the descriptions written for them
were published nowhere, and every use site inlined an anonymous copy. A client
generated from the contract got duplicated nameless types where one named
model belongs, which is the part that matters, because the iOS client is why
the contract is published.

Forty of them now bind their clone, and every use site points at it. Where the
schema comes from `src/lib/validations/*` the import is aliased and the clone
takes the name the use sites already spell, so nothing mutates the runtime
validation schema. The seven that cross module boundaries are exported from
`./shared` and the eight consumers import them from there; importing the raw
schema from the validation module instead is exactly what inlined them.

Thirty-four named components appear where inline copies stood. Fully
dereferenced, the document differs by eighty-six added descriptions and
nothing else: no operation's request or response shape moves. `CoachPrefs`
was already force-registered in the index and finally carries its description.

Five ids legitimately stay out of `components.schemas` —
`ListMeasurementsQuery`, `ListAllergiesQuery`, `ListEncountersQuery`,
`SuggestEncounterQuery` and `ListPractitionersQuery`. The emitter expands a
`requestParams.query` object into inline `parameters`, so a query id has
nowhere to land; they stay in the assigning form for consistency.

Three findings the wiring turned up:

`CreateShareLinkRequest` and `HealthRecordExportRequest` were annotated in the
Coach module, which imported the two schemas for no other reason and never
referenced them. Both operations that send these bodies live in the
health-record module, so the annotations move there. Both descriptions
described a `sections` field: the export body has no such field and rejects it
with a 422, and the share-link body freezes scope through `selection` plus
`documentIds` / `documentOnly`. Publishing either sentence verbatim would have
published a lie, so both are corrected to the shape the routes actually take.

`CoachPlansListQuery` — the forty-first — named a component that nothing
referenced and that a query object could never reach. The operation publishes
its two parameters by hand, because the schema carries a cross-field
refinement the expansion cannot express, and every clause of the annotation is
already published on the operation and on both parameters. It is deleted
rather than left registering nothing.

2026-08-22 15:34:32 +02:00

2.3 MiB

Raw Blame History