mirror of
https://github.com/MBombeck/HealthLog.git
synced 2026-11-09 21:10:59 +00:00
A grant has always had an access column and `inviteGrant` has always written READ into it. That was the right way to ship the first version: "this release never grants write" was a property of the file rather than a promise in a comment. Remove it deliberately now, so somebody sharing their record can offer reading or reading plus adding. The level is a required argument to `inviteGrant` and is defaulted in exactly one place, the invite schema, where an omitted field becomes READ. An older client's payload therefore stays valid and stays narrow, and the domain module never guesses a level nobody named. There is no upgrade path and that is the decision, not a gap. A grant is READ or WRITE from the moment it is offered and stays that way until somebody ends it. Widening a live one would change what the delegate agreed to without asking them again, and their consent is half of what makes a write grant legitimate. The way up is a new invitation, accepted again. The audit row and the wide event carry the level: "who was given what, and by whom" is the question that row exists to answer.
340 lines
11 KiB
TypeScript
340 lines
11 KiB
TypeScript
/**
|
|
* What the audit trail records for a delegated action, and for a self action.
|
|
*
|
|
* The whole feature rests on one reading: `actorUserId` NULL means the account
|
|
* acted for itself. Every row written before the column existed means that,
|
|
* and every row written after it will mostly mean it too — so a threading rule
|
|
* that stamps an actor where none was acting does not add information, it
|
|
* changes what several years of history says. That reading is what these tests
|
|
* hold, against real rows.
|
|
*
|
|
* Round trips through the real routes, for the reason that cost this project a
|
|
* release: a unit stub proves the code ran, not what landed. Here the question
|
|
* is only ever "which row exists afterwards, and what is in its columns".
|
|
*/
|
|
import { beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
|
|
|
|
import { NextRequest, NextResponse } from "next/server";
|
|
|
|
import { cookieJar, headerJar } from "./mock-next-headers";
|
|
import { getPrismaClient, truncateAllTables } from "./setup";
|
|
|
|
vi.mock("next/headers", async () => {
|
|
const { cookieJar, headerJar } = await import("./mock-next-headers");
|
|
return {
|
|
headers: vi.fn(async () => ({
|
|
get: (name: string) => headerJar.get(name.toLowerCase()) ?? null,
|
|
})),
|
|
cookies: vi.fn(async () => ({
|
|
get: (name: string) => {
|
|
const value = cookieJar.get(name);
|
|
return value ? { name, value } : undefined;
|
|
},
|
|
set: (name: string, value: string) => {
|
|
cookieJar.set(name, value);
|
|
},
|
|
delete: (name: string) => {
|
|
cookieJar.delete(name);
|
|
},
|
|
})),
|
|
};
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
vi.mock("@/lib/db-compat", () => ({
|
|
ensureDbCompatibility: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue(undefined),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
import { apiHandler, requireRecordAuth } from "@/lib/api-handler";
|
|
import { auditLog, DELEGATED_ACCESS_ACTION } from "@/lib/auth/audit";
|
|
import { acceptGrant, inviteGrant } from "@/lib/sharing/grants";
|
|
|
|
let counter = 0;
|
|
|
|
async function makeUser(label: string) {
|
|
const suffix = `${label}-${counter++}`;
|
|
return getPrismaClient().user.create({
|
|
data: {
|
|
username: `audit-${suffix}`,
|
|
email: `audit-${suffix}@example.test`,
|
|
role: "USER",
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function signIn(userId: string) {
|
|
const session = await getPrismaClient().session.create({
|
|
data: { userId, expiresAt: new Date(Date.now() + 60_000) },
|
|
});
|
|
cookieJar.set("healthlog_session", session.id);
|
|
return session;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* A delegable route that writes an audit row the way a migrated route does:
|
|
* `userId` from the resolved data scope, and nothing about the actor, because
|
|
* the actor is not the handler's business.
|
|
*/
|
|
const delegableAction: (request: NextRequest) => Promise<Response> = apiHandler(
|
|
async () => {
|
|
const { user } = await requireRecordAuth("read");
|
|
await auditLog("measurement.read", {
|
|
userId: user.id,
|
|
details: { via: "test" },
|
|
});
|
|
return NextResponse.json({ data: { ok: true }, error: null });
|
|
},
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
/** The same handler's self-action case: no switch, same code path. */
|
|
function act(): Promise<Response> {
|
|
return delegableAction(
|
|
new NextRequest("http://localhost/api/test/delegable", { method: "GET" }),
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function household() {
|
|
const owner = await makeUser("owner");
|
|
const delegate = await makeUser("delegate");
|
|
const invited = await inviteGrant({
|
|
grantorId: owner.id,
|
|
granteeId: delegate.id,
|
|
access: "READ",
|
|
});
|
|
await acceptGrant({ grantId: invited.id, granteeId: delegate.id });
|
|
const session = await signIn(delegate.id);
|
|
await getPrismaClient().session.update({
|
|
where: { id: session.id },
|
|
data: { actingAsUserId: owner.id },
|
|
});
|
|
return { owner, delegate, session };
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function rowsFor(action: string) {
|
|
return getPrismaClient().auditLog.findMany({
|
|
where: { action },
|
|
orderBy: { createdAt: "asc" },
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/** The resolver's access row is fire-and-forget; give it a tick to land. */
|
|
async function settle() {
|
|
await new Promise((resolve) => setTimeout(resolve, 80));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
beforeEach(async () => {
|
|
await truncateAllTables(getPrismaClient());
|
|
cookieJar.clear();
|
|
headerJar.clear();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe("who the trail says did it", () => {
|
|
it("files a delegated action under the owner, naming the delegate", async () => {
|
|
const { owner, delegate } = await household();
|
|
|
|
expect((await act()).status).toBe(200);
|
|
|
|
const rows = await rowsFor("measurement.read");
|
|
expect(rows).toHaveLength(1);
|
|
expect(rows[0].userId).toBe(owner.id);
|
|
expect(rows[0].actorUserId).toBe(delegate.id);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("leaves the actor NULL when somebody acts on their own record", async () => {
|
|
// The load-bearing one. NULL is not "we did not know" — it is the
|
|
// statement every historical row already makes, and the same handler,
|
|
// unswitched, has to keep making it.
|
|
const solo = await makeUser("solo");
|
|
await signIn(solo.id);
|
|
|
|
expect((await act()).status).toBe(200);
|
|
|
|
const rows = await rowsFor("measurement.read");
|
|
expect(rows).toHaveLength(1);
|
|
expect(rows[0].userId).toBe(solo.id);
|
|
expect(rows[0].actorUserId).toBeNull();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("leaves the actor NULL on a row a delegate writes about themselves", async () => {
|
|
// A delegated request that files under the DELEGATE describes the
|
|
// delegate's own act. Stamping the actor there would say "somebody else
|
|
// did this to you" about a person acting on themselves.
|
|
const { delegate } = await household();
|
|
|
|
const handler: (request: NextRequest) => Promise<Response> = apiHandler(
|
|
async () => {
|
|
const { actor } = await requireRecordAuth("read");
|
|
await auditLog("delegate.own.act", { userId: actor.id });
|
|
return NextResponse.json({ data: { ok: true }, error: null });
|
|
},
|
|
);
|
|
await handler(
|
|
new NextRequest("http://localhost/api/test/delegable", { method: "GET" }),
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
const rows = await rowsFor("delegate.own.act");
|
|
expect(rows).toHaveLength(1);
|
|
expect(rows[0].userId).toBe(delegate.id);
|
|
expect(rows[0].actorUserId).toBeNull();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("leaves the actor NULL on a refused delegation", async () => {
|
|
// The refusal row already exists (the resolver writes it). It is the
|
|
// caller's own act — an attempt they made as themselves — and it must not
|
|
// acquire an actor just because the request mentioned another account.
|
|
const delegate = await makeUser("delegate");
|
|
const stranger = await makeUser("stranger");
|
|
const session = await signIn(delegate.id);
|
|
await getPrismaClient().session.update({
|
|
where: { id: session.id },
|
|
data: { actingAsUserId: stranger.id },
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect((await act()).status).toBe(403);
|
|
await settle();
|
|
|
|
const rows = await rowsFor("sharing.access.denied");
|
|
expect(rows).toHaveLength(1);
|
|
expect(rows[0].userId).toBe(delegate.id);
|
|
expect(rows[0].actorUserId).toBeNull();
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe("delegated reads coalesce to one row a day", () => {
|
|
it("writes one row for many reads, and counts them", async () => {
|
|
const { owner, delegate } = await household();
|
|
|
|
await act();
|
|
await act();
|
|
await act();
|
|
await settle();
|
|
|
|
const rows = await rowsFor(DELEGATED_ACCESS_ACTION);
|
|
expect(rows).toHaveLength(1);
|
|
expect(rows[0].userId).toBe(owner.id);
|
|
expect(rows[0].actorUserId).toBe(delegate.id);
|
|
expect(JSON.parse(rows[0].details!)).toEqual({ accesses: 3 });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("keeps a second delegate's reads on their own row", async () => {
|
|
// Coalescing is per (owner, delegate, day). Two delegates in one record on
|
|
// one day are two rows — merging them would answer "somebody was in your
|
|
// record" when the owner asked "who".
|
|
const { owner, delegate } = await household();
|
|
const second = await makeUser("second");
|
|
const invited = await inviteGrant({
|
|
grantorId: owner.id,
|
|
granteeId: second.id,
|
|
access: "READ",
|
|
});
|
|
await acceptGrant({ grantId: invited.id, granteeId: second.id });
|
|
|
|
await act();
|
|
const secondSession = await signIn(second.id);
|
|
await getPrismaClient().session.update({
|
|
where: { id: secondSession.id },
|
|
data: { actingAsUserId: owner.id },
|
|
});
|
|
await act();
|
|
await settle();
|
|
|
|
const rows = await rowsFor(DELEGATED_ACCESS_ACTION);
|
|
expect(rows).toHaveLength(2);
|
|
expect(rows.map((r) => r.actorUserId).sort()).toEqual(
|
|
[delegate.id, second.id].sort(),
|
|
);
|
|
expect(rows.every((r) => r.userId === owner.id)).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("starts a new row on the next day", async () => {
|
|
const { owner, delegate } = await household();
|
|
|
|
await act();
|
|
await settle();
|
|
|
|
// Age today's row by a day. The coalescing key is the row's own date, so
|
|
// this is exactly what tomorrow looks like to the next read — and if the
|
|
// key were "the latest row" rather than the day, the next read would still
|
|
// find this one and the trail would grow one row per delegate forever.
|
|
await getPrismaClient().$executeRaw`
|
|
UPDATE audit_logs
|
|
SET created_at = created_at - INTERVAL '1 day'
|
|
WHERE action = ${DELEGATED_ACCESS_ACTION}
|
|
`;
|
|
|
|
await act();
|
|
await settle();
|
|
|
|
const rows = await rowsFor(DELEGATED_ACCESS_ACTION);
|
|
expect(rows).toHaveLength(2);
|
|
expect(rows.every((r) => r.userId === owner.id)).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(rows.every((r) => r.actorUserId === delegate.id)).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("writes nothing at all when nobody is delegating", async () => {
|
|
const solo = await makeUser("solo");
|
|
await signIn(solo.id);
|
|
|
|
await act();
|
|
await settle();
|
|
|
|
expect(await rowsFor(DELEGATED_ACCESS_ACTION)).toHaveLength(0);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe("the lifecycle verbs leave their own trail", () => {
|
|
it("records the invitation, the acceptance and the revocation", async () => {
|
|
const owner = await makeUser("owner");
|
|
const delegate = await makeUser("delegate");
|
|
|
|
await signIn(owner.id);
|
|
const { POST } = await import("@/app/api/account/grants/route");
|
|
const invited = await POST(
|
|
new NextRequest("http://localhost/api/account/grants", {
|
|
method: "POST",
|
|
headers: { "content-type": "application/json" },
|
|
body: JSON.stringify({ identifier: delegate.username }),
|
|
}),
|
|
);
|
|
const grantId = (await invited.json()).data.id;
|
|
|
|
await signIn(delegate.id);
|
|
const accept = await import("@/app/api/account/grants/[id]/accept/route");
|
|
await accept.POST(
|
|
new NextRequest(`http://localhost/api/account/grants/${grantId}/accept`, {
|
|
method: "POST",
|
|
headers: { "content-type": "application/json" },
|
|
}),
|
|
{ params: Promise.resolve({ id: grantId }) },
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
await signIn(owner.id);
|
|
const revokeRoute = await import("@/app/api/account/grants/[id]/route");
|
|
await revokeRoute.DELETE(
|
|
new NextRequest(`http://localhost/api/account/grants/${grantId}`, {
|
|
method: "DELETE",
|
|
headers: { "content-type": "application/json" },
|
|
}),
|
|
{ params: Promise.resolve({ id: grantId }) },
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
const trail = await getPrismaClient().auditLog.findMany({
|
|
where: { action: { startsWith: "sharing.grant." } },
|
|
orderBy: { createdAt: "asc" },
|
|
});
|
|
expect(trail.map((r) => r.action)).toEqual([
|
|
"sharing.grant.invited",
|
|
"sharing.grant.accepted",
|
|
"sharing.grant.revoked",
|
|
]);
|
|
// Each row files under whoever performed it, acting as themselves. The
|
|
// owner's side of the acceptance is not an audit row at all — it is
|
|
// `acceptedAt` on the grant, which is the durable consent record.
|
|
expect(trail.map((r) => r.userId)).toEqual([
|
|
owner.id,
|
|
delegate.id,
|
|
owner.id,
|
|
]);
|
|
expect(trail.every((r) => r.actorUserId === null)).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|