Marc-André Bombeck 032ea5b1a0 Register the schema names the contract was discarding ...

Zod 4's `.meta()` clones the schema and registers the clone, so a bare
`someSchema.meta({ id })` statement registers nothing at all. Thirty-nine of
those across eleven route modules published neither the name nor the
description written for it: the schema inlined anonymously at every use site,
and a client generated from the contract got a duplicated nameless type where
one named model belongs. That last part is the cost that matters, because the
native client is the reason the contract is published.

Bind each annotated clone to a const and point the route table at that const.
Twenty-nine ids now emit under `components.schemas`, referenced from their
thirty use sites. Seven stay absent by design: they annotate
`requestParams.query` objects, which the emitter expands into inline
`parameters` rather than a component. `MoodTagLayout` stays absent too, for
the reason `Medication` and `CoachPrefs` already carry a forced registration
in the components block: its only consumer is an `.extend()`, and extending
builds a new object rather than referencing the base.

Two annotations in the illness module named ids that no route ever referenced,
`GetIllnessDayLogQuery` and `ListIllnessDayLogsQuery` — the day-log path
publishes the merged `GetIllnessDayLogsQuery` instead. They were dead twice
over, so they go rather than get wired to nothing.

`docs/api/openapi.yaml` grows the twenty-nine components and their refs. The
only other movement in it is thirty descriptions appearing where the text had
never reached the document. No request or response shape changes.

2026-08-22 15:24:05 +02:00

2.3 MiB

Raw Blame History