Thirty-one files carried internal build vocabulary and anchors pointing at
notes that are not in the repository: a reader of `checklist.ts` in a year
would find its rationale keyed to a research id they cannot open, inside a
comment that also names an internal build stage. Two test titles carried the
same anchors.
The version tags and the whole of the reasoning stay; only the vocabulary and
the dangling references go, with the few sentences that were built around an
anchor rewritten to stand on their own.
The screen listed what the answers switch on and said everything else
stays one click away under Settings, Modules. That is true of
reachability and false of the navigation entry: a module the answers do
not ask for is written off by the completion's derivation.
It now names those modules, read through the registry's own merge rule
and intersected with the map the navigation shows today, so nothing is
claimed about a module the account payload says nothing about.
What the answers switch on is read off the registry's derivation and
never computed here, so the list the person confirms is the list the
completion route writes. Units, language and time zone are shown once
beside it, changeable in Settings, never asked again.
The profile half keeps the baseline form and its per-field refusals:
the fields are seeded from the account so a value it holds is confirmed
rather than typed again, and a refused field still stops the flow. For
"someone I look after" the managed-profile form takes the profile's
place, because that record is created here, after the questions; an
account without a second factor can finish without it and create it
later under Settings.
Confirming posts the completion, passes the first-result step outright
when there is no task to offer, and goes where the step machine says.
Marc-André Bombeck