The backup carried neither the import ledger nor the tombstones of
deleted documents, so after a restore onto a fresh instance a token
importer stored every imported document the person had deleted on
purpose again.
The document filing section now carries documentImportKeys: the
ledger's rows plus the own and alias keys of the documents waiting in
Recently deleted, which still do not travel as documents. The restore
writes them back, minus any key a restored live document holds, and
counts them in the restore summary and the preview. DocumentImportKey
moves from the excluded models to the two-ended ones, and the round
trip, the column audit and the parity goldens carry a ledger row.
Several export reads sorted only by a column two rows can share (a
creation time, a day, a name), and a few to-many reads (medication
schedules, mood tag links, cycle and illness symptom links) had no order
at all. Tied rows then came back in whatever order they sat on disk, so
two exports of one account could differ, and the parity goldens flapped
once the fixture's child rows shared their pinned timestamps.
Each read now ends its order in the model's primary key: the existing
sort key plus `id`, or the remaining key columns of a compound key
(nutrient `source`, hidden tag `moodTagId`, link `symptomId` /
`moodTagId` / `documentId`). Schedules sort by window start, then id.
The restore re-export reads through the same modules, so it inherits
the order.
The parity goldens are unchanged: they already hold the tie-broken
order, so no regeneration was needed and they still pin the output of
the pre-split exporter.
A new integration test runs both purposes, built and streamed, through
a client that records every findMany and every nested to-many read, and
fails on any whose order does not cover the primary key (keys pinned by
an equality in `where`, or by the foreign key to the parent, count as
covered). A second case writes the same tied rows in forward and
reverse physical order and requires byte-identical files.
`DocumentConditionLink` and `ExtractedFact` were classified as backed up and
came back from no restore. The register said a restored vault is unsorted and
that the facts are re-derivable by re-running the extraction. The first is
right; the second understates it. What a re-run cannot produce is the REVIEW
DECISION on each fact, and every column holding one defaults to "nobody has
looked at this yet". `POST /api/documents/inbound/[id]/confirm` acts only on a
PENDING fact and commits it into the structured store, so a restore that let
those columns default would offer an already-committed reading for approval a
second time and write a second lab result behind it.
Both ends live in `src/lib/export/document-filing-backup.ts`, beside each other
like the Coach, reminder and vaccination sections. `status`, `needsReview`,
`confidence` and the commitment pair are carried and restored verbatim, and the
wire schema requires the first three rather than defaulting them.
Ordering: the section runs after the documents, the condition episodes, the lab
results and the medications. The first two are real foreign keys, unlike the
Coach's bare id columns, so an unresolvable value there does not cost one edge,
it aborts the transaction and the operator gets none of the account back. The
last two are what `committedRecordId` resolves against. The builder therefore
carries a filing or a fact only when both of its ends are carried, and the
restore still checks and drops what a hand-edited file leaves unresolvable.
`committedRecordId` is nulled together with its type, because a type with no id
claims a commitment the row cannot name.
The round trip seeds a second condition and files the page under it, so a
restore that kept the count and lost the pairing fails rather than handing back
a lab report filed under a head cold. A third case breaks both references in a
saved file to prove the drop path runs and still answers 200.
Three new skip catalogues arrive with it, and with them labels for the three
that had none: a dropped Coach attachment had been reaching the operator's
screen labelled "mood factor" since it was added. The label chain is exhaustive
now, so the next catalogue without one stops the build.
Marc-André Bombeck