Running the two cases in parallel let each walk the other's account state, so
they go serial like the sibling journeys. The second case also asserted the
wrong thing: with a Q2 area answered as well, an already-delivering source
correctly falls through to `log-reading` — that IS the fix. Split into three:
nothing connected, a connection with somewhere to fall to, and a connection
that is the only task the answers name.
No journey reached the connect arm: bp answers `manual`, visit answers
`file`, and the child path ends at confirm. The a11y sweep opened the screen
and asserted the connect card was visible — which it was, for the few hundred
milliseconds before the status envelope resolved, so the sweep passed through
the defect rather than catching it.
The new journey answers Q4 with a wearable and asserts only after
`GET /api/integrations/status` has settled: nothing is claimed for an account
with no connection and no result is stamped on its behalf, and a connection
seeded as delivering is acknowledged rather than offered. The a11y sweep now
waits for the tile the screen settled on instead of the frame before it.