The defect is about rows that survive, so a mocked client proves nothing. The
new integration test seeds a row into every table in the schema, driven by
information_schema and pg_constraint rather than a fixture, runs the wipe and
asks the database what is left. A table added later is seeded and asserted
without anyone remembering to.
It holds all four halves: nothing in the wipe list survives, everything in the
exemption list does, everything reached only by a database cascade is gone,
and the account row comes back reset but able to sign in. A second file pins
the allergy and checkup-reminder deletes actually removing their row.
The reproductive-health note gains a Deletion section. It taught people to
reason carefully about a host being imaged and never said what pressing
delete does; now it says which of the three deletions removes the row and
which only hides it.
The wipe deleted thirteen tables against a schema that carries more than
eighty user-scoped ones. Mental-health assessments, lab results, the
menstrual record, allergies, family history, the document vault, every AI
conversation and live clinician share links all survived a confirmation
that promised to permanently delete all health data. So did
MeasurementRollup, the per-day reconstruction of the measurements the same
transaction had just removed.
The list now lives in src/lib/data-wipe/wipe-plan.ts next to its own
exemption list, and a structural guard enumerates schema.prisma and fails
when a model belongs to neither. Adding a model can no longer widen the set
of things that survive a wipe by default. The same guard covers the User
row's own columns, which had drifted the same way.
The boundary is explicit: everything the account owns goes, except what is
needed to sign in again. The confirmation and the toast say so before the
person types the confirmation rather than after.
Checkup reminders and allergies promised permanence over a soft delete with
no restore path; both now hard-delete, so the dialog is true. The lab
biomarker dialog was checked and is already accurate — it maps to the
hard-deleting /api/biomarkers/[id] route, not to the soft-deleting lab
result route.
Add the `/api/allergies` and `/api/family-history` endpoints (list / create /
read / update / soft-delete), each wrapped in `apiHandler` with Zod
`safeParse` + `returnAllZodIssues`. `userId` is always narrowed from the
session/Bearer — never a body field — and the Prisma `data` is built
field-by-field (no mass assignment). Creates wrap in `withIdempotency`. The
free-text reaction/note are encrypted before write and decrypted fail-soft on
read via the server-authoritative DTOs.
Register the query-key factory entries and the OpenAPI route tables (new
`Records` tag); regenerate `docs/api/openapi.yaml`.
Marc-André Bombeck