The mood rollup warm-up on the dashboard summary was started with a bare
`void`, so `settleBackgroundTasks()` never saw it. On a stale account the
warm-up started a full recompute that could still be writing when the
statement counter closed its window, and the hot-route budget read 30
against 28 depending on where it landed.
Every read-path start of that shape now goes through
`trackBackgroundTask(runDetached(...))`: the measurement and mood rollup
warm-ups (seven call sites), the dashboard's today-briefing warm, and the
two delegated-access bookkeeping writes in the record guard. A guard
refuses a bare `void` on any of them.
`trackBackgroundTask` now wraps its handle in `Promise.resolve`: a test
double that returns nothing used to leave `undefined` in the set, and
settle spun on it at full CPU.
The budget fixture mints the mood rollups in its seed, as it already did
for the measurement rollups. Eight serial runs of
query-budget-hot-routes read the same counts every time (dashboard
summary 28, snapshot 99, day 47, health-status 59, correlations 43).
The unit suite reported all 1937 files green and then failed the job with
`EnvironmentTeardownError: Closing rpc while "onUserConsoleLog" was
pending`, naming a different scoring test each time.
Vitest replaces globalThis.console with a sink that forwards every write
to the main thread as an onUserConsoleLog RPC call. When a worker
finishes a test file it awaits the calls in flight and then rejects
whatever was started after that point, so a console write from work that
outlived its test lands in the gap and fails the run. The blame goes to
the file being torn down rather than to the test that started the work,
which is why the named file never logged anything itself.
Three paths detach a promise and log on the handle: fireAndForget, the
stale-while-revalidate cache refresh, and the offline query persister.
They now register the handled handle in a set that both suite setups
drain in afterEach, so no test leaves work in flight. The registry is
inert outside test: nothing there awaits it, and holding a reference to
an unsettled promise would retain it for the life of a worker. No
production behaviour changes, so there is no changelog entry.
Evidence. A focused harness that starts failing background tasks and
returns hit the teardown error 10 runs out of 10 before the change and
0 out of 10 after. Instrumenting the real suite showed two detached
console writes per run escaping their test, both from the rollup tail;
after the change, none, and thirteen writes per run now complete inside
the test that started them.
The guard asserts the behaviour, not a count: a registered task must
keep settleBackgroundTasks from resolving ahead of it, and the set must
drain back to empty. It goes red on unregistered work, on a disabled
registry, on an unwrapped call site, on a sweep that matches nothing,
and on a setup that drops the hook.
Marc-André Bombeck