The earlier rule could leave a one-day cycle in front of a real start
when day two of a period was logged before day one. Tapping "My period
started this day" on the real first day folds the later start in, but
the re-tapped row kept the end date and length its vanished successor
had given it, so the repaired cycle stayed closed after one day.
A start with no cycle after it is open, so opening one now clears a
stale end and length. The repair of such a history is covered end to
end: the broken state is seeded as the old rule left it, the one tap
is made through the period route, and the result is a single open
cycle that owns every day of the period.
The log sheet took its "Day N" header and its "period ended" button
from the verdict, which is the answer about today. A January date opened
in September read "Day 2", and a back-dated period could only be closed
on dates where today happened to be a bleeding day, so the button came
and went as unrelated months were filled in.
The calendar read now carries, per date, the cycle day of the logged
cycle that date belongs to (null before the first start, after today, or
past the verdict's ceiling for an open cycle) and whether a one-tap
period end can land there. The sheet reads both off the grid day for the
date it opened on.
Saving a new entry with nothing picked used to write an empty row: the
request succeeded, the sheet closed and the calendar had nothing to
draw, which read as a save that did nothing. Save now needs something to
store and says what, and an emptied existing entry still saves. The
sheet also stops writing until the opened date's own entry has loaded,
because until then it held the previous date's row id and a quick Save
patched the wrong day.
On the server, a start recorded a few days after an earlier one is the
same period entered in the other order: opening the earlier start now
folds the later one into it instead of leaving a one-day cycle in front
of it, and a bleed too far before the next start to be its first day and
too close to be a cycle of its own no longer infers a start. Opening or
removing a start re-attributes the day-logs whose cycle changed.
MenstrualCycle rows were only ever written by the one-tap period
boundary. Every other way of recording bleeding wrote a day-log and
stopped there: the log sheet's flow chips, the bulk drain, an Apple
Health export full of menstrual-flow samples. The engine reads cycle
rows, so a person could log every period they had and the module still
held that none had happened. No cycle length, no forecast, an empty
chart, and an offer to log a first period. An Apple Health user who
never found the one-tap button had the whole module dead.
A first bleeding day now opens the cycle it belongs to, through one
shared seam in the day-log write helper, so the single capture, the
bulk drain and the Apple Health fold all infer a start the same way and
the one-tap boundary's own write lands on a date that already has a
cycle, which the rule declines.
The rule is conservative, because a false start corrupts every length
derived after it. Spotting does not open a cycle: it is as often the
tail or the herald of a period as its first day. Bleeding flagged as
between periods does not, since that flag exists to say so. Neither does
a bleeding day within the hard physiological minimum of an existing
start, which is what keeps day three of a period, or a forgotten day
two, from starting a cycle of its own without needing a contiguity
check. A genuinely short cycle is not inferred from flow alone; the
one-tap start still opens one on any date.
An edit is symmetric. Setting a flow opens the cycle; clearing it, or
flagging it as between periods, removes the cycle that day opened and
re-opens the one before it. A cycle that an edit can create and not undo
leaves the record holding a period nothing on the day says happened.
- the period route's start arm and the flow inference now share one
boundary helper, so a start means the same thing however it is entered
- back-dating re-anchors both neighbours, as the one-tap start does
- integration: eleven cases through the real routes, of which five are
about what must NOT open a cycle
Opening a cycle closes the one before it: the start write stamps the
previous cycle's endDate and lengthDays, and a back-filled start takes
its own end from its successor. Nothing undid any of that. Deleting the
start left the previous cycle as a closed torso holding an end date from
a cycle that no longer existed, and a record whose last cycle is closed
has no open cycle to forecast from — the prediction went away and there
was no way to bring it back from the app.
Both removal paths now re-derive the boundary from the cycles that
remain: a cycle ends the day before the next one begins, and with no
next one it is open again. That is a re-derivation rather than an undo
log, so it is correct for a history that came from an import or a
restore, and running it twice changes nothing the second time.
Deleting the day-log that opened a cycle now removes that cycle too.
The one-tap start writes both rows and the log sheet's delete is the
only way the web offers to take it back; leaving the cycle standing was
how the broken state survived the undo.
- soft-delete and re-anchor run in one transaction
- the audit row names the neighbour's moved boundary, the only part of
the write the tombstone cannot reconstruct
- round trip through the real routes: photograph the cycle rows, log the
start, remove it either way, compare field by field — including that
the forecast comes back
Marc-André Bombeck