- a new backup section reads the dose and its document link through
their own delegates and writes both ends in one file, the arrangement
the visit section already uses
- the practitioner and the visit remap to the rows the same restore put
back; the booster reminder never travels, so its reference resolves to
null and the drop is reported rather than swallowed
- the antigen slug restores verbatim: a slug the catalogue has since
dropped still says what a person was given
- the round trip seeds a dose with every optional column filled and
reads each one back, so a returning row count cannot stand in for a
returning record
- the wipe plan names it before its parent, so the confirmation screen's count
is the number of rows that existed rather than zero
- the backup plan classifies it as carried and two-ended, and the round-trip
registry seeds one, which is what makes that claim provable
- the sharing surface admits the linked-day read with the reason it may answer
- CHANGELOG for the release
A person's whole 'which doctor' history was one free-text column on a
reminder: they typed the practice name once and could reach nothing else
that happened there. This turns that string into a record.
Five tables in migration 0320, all additive: an encounter that happened
or is booked, the account's own address book of practitioners, and three
links from a visit to the documents, lab results and conditions it
produced. The encounter is slim on purpose — the diagnosis stays on the
linked condition, the address on the linked practitioner, and the reason
each field was kept or cut is written at the model. No module gate, and
the schema says why rather than leaving the absence to be read as an
oversight.
Every carrier lands with the tables rather than after them. All five are
classified as travelling both ways and are proven doing it: a seeded row
of each goes out through the real export builder, the account is deleted
so the schema's cascade decides what survives, and the rows are counted
back through the real restore route. Two references deliberately do not
survive and are named instead of dropped quietly — the reminder a visit
points at is not in the backup, and a link whose far side a portable
export does not carry cannot resolve. The wipe plan deletes the links
before the lab results and documents they hang off, or the audit row
would report zero for rows that existed. The three encrypted columns are
registered for key rotation, without which dropping a legacy key would
make those notes permanently unreadable.
Widening the reminder origin enum is a type error at the reminder DTO,
which is the right outcome: the mapper now refuses an appointment row
outright rather than relabelling it as a checkup.
MedicationSideEffect was classified as backed up and was not carried: the
export wrote nothing and the restore had nothing to read, so a restored
account kept the drug and lost the reason someone may have stopped taking it.
Delegated write access sharpens that — a side effect is one of the things a
second person can contribute, and it was the contribution a restore dropped.
The rows ride inside their medication, like the schedules beside them. A
top-level array would have to carry `medicationId` and survive a restore that
mints a fresh id for a portable file, which is the remap the intake events
already work around by drug name; a nested create has no id to remap, because
Prisma binds the child to whatever id the parent row actually got.
The note follows the measurement contract for the same dual-column
arrangement: a portable export carries the decrypted note and no ciphertext, a
disaster-recovery payload carries the ciphertext verbatim, and the restore
re-encrypts a legacy plaintext row rather than writing plaintext back into the
column.
Move the model from COVERAGE_PENDING to TWO_ENDED_MODELS, and settle the claim
where a written verdict cannot: the round trip seeds a side effect, exports
through the real builder, empties the account and reads the row back out of
the real restore route with its category, entry, severity and note intact.
Both halves were excised to check the test can fail — the restore branch turns
the count red, the payload turns the field values red.
The plan says which models a backup carries and a source-text check says
each one has a reader and a restore branch written for it. Neither can
tell a restore branch that runs from one that only exists: wrap the
nutrient restore in `if (false && …)` and every check stays green, which
is the correct-green-and-inert shape this project already shipped once.
So settle it end to end. Seed one row of every two-ended model, export
through the real payload builder, delete the account so the cascade
empties what a hand-listed sweep would miss, restore through the real
admin route, and count each row back out. A model that never travels
comes back at zero and says which one it was.
The two-ended list is a literal tuple now, so the seed registry can be
keyed by it: adding a name without seeding and counting a row for it is
a compile error rather than an unproven claim.
Also names `src/lib/illness/dto.ts` as a backup writer. The illness
day-log's symptom include is a shared constant living there, not a
literal in the records writer — the same "the caller delegates" shape
that already caught the measurement pager.
Marc-André Bombeck