Commit Graph
2 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Marc-André Bombeck 040b430e73 fix(api): accept an Idempotency-Key on the titration step and the custom symptom
Two more creates the client replays out of its offline outbox ran the
handler again on the replay. A titration step carries no natural key at
all, so a lost success response left the medication with two dose
changes on the same day and the runway estimate reading off the wrong
one. A custom cycle symptom is unique on its label, so the replay did
not duplicate — it answered the 409 that uniqueness raises, reporting a
conflict the client cannot act on for a row it has no record of
creating.

Both wrap in `withIdempotency`, the composition their siblings already
ship, and both operations publish the header and the in-flight 409 so a
client generated against the contract can tell a retry is safe.

The integration file that drives the medication creates twice against
real Postgres gains the titration case: one dose-change row after the
replay, and a replayed 201 carrying `X-Idempotent-Replay: true`.

`POST /api/mcp/tokens` is deliberately not on this list. Its response
carries a freshly minted `hlk_` credential, and the wrapper refuses to
persist a secret-shaped body — publishing the header there would
promise a replay the mechanism will never perform.
2026-09-10 07:40:05 +02:00
Marc-André Bombeck 6fe1897941 fix(medications): accept an Idempotency-Key on the three replayed creates
The native client replays its offline outbox with the same
Idempotency-Key on every attempt, and `POST /api/medications`, the
side-effect log and the inventory register ran the handler again on the
replay: after a lost success response the account was left with a
duplicate medication, a duplicate symptom entry or a second pen in the
supply count. The dedupe on `(externalSource, externalId)` only ever
covered a MIRRORED create; a manually entered medication carries
neither field and had nothing to collapse a retry onto.

All three wrap in `withIdempotency`, the composition the batch ingest
already ships, and the three operations publish the header so a client
generated against the contract can tell that a retry is safe. Zod
parsing and `requireRecordAuth` are untouched.

An integration test drives each route twice against real Postgres and
asserts what a status check cannot: one row in the table, and a replayed
201 carrying `X-Idempotent-Replay: true`.
2026-09-10 01:04:57 +02:00