The switch was stored and shown, but nothing reads the topics flag
yet, so the page promised a change it could not make. The section,
its nav entry, its loader and its copy are gone, so its palette
entry goes with them; /settings/preview is no longer a route. The
stored flag, /api/settings/preview-features and its backup round-trip
stay, and the column's pending-consumer note says why.
Point the header, overscroll and timezone specs at the pages that hold
those cards now, add the module pages and Preview features to the
one-piece sweep, and add a 390 px journey through the grouped section
sheet. Unit coverage for the Preview features card.
The Appearance hub paints its modules as one divide-y ledger inside a
settings card, and the card dropped its padding without dropping its gap.
The gap survived between the rows as unclickable space the first row does
not have: 24 px on desktop, 16 px on a phone, measured. Rows read a step
apart from the top of their own list.
- SettingsCard grows a `flush` variant that drops padding AND gap, naming
the shape `<InsightSectionCard flush>` already names on the Insights side
- the geometry sweep gains a fourth claim: in a divided list card nothing
sits between two rows but the divider, and the first row starts at the
card's inner edge
Measuring the seven `/settings/layout/<child>` routes was meant to pin the
back-link spacing. It found there was no back-link to pin.
`SettingsHubBackLink` and `settings.sections.layout.backToHub` have existed
since the sub-pages were split out, and the only thing that mounted them was
the shell's slug FALLBACK — the branch that runs when a page passes no
`heading`. These pages pass an explicit one, so the fallback never ran and no
child route has painted a back-link since. The component was written, the
string was written, the reverse-coverage guard saw a call site and was
satisfied, and the way back to the hub was not on the page. Two ends, no pipe.
It now comes from the page, where the heading it belongs to comes from.
The geometry spec grows the seven routes and a second family. A route with a
back-link carries an extra row above the title, so it is taller by
construction; comparing it against a plain route would report structure as
drift. Each family is checked for its own constant heading top, and the step
between the back-link and the title is asserted at 6 px — `PageHeader`'s
documented `space-y-1.5`, which is what the shell's hand-rolled `space-y-6`
would have drifted back to.
Measured, both languages: plain routes 24.0 px, back-link routes 51.0 px,
spread 0.0 px in both families, step 6.0 px on all seven.
The back-link is also painted twice, once per breakpoint, so the measurement
picks the copy with a box — `querySelector` returns document order, which on
a desktop width is the hidden mobile one, and reading it reported no
back-link at all.
Thirty-four routes, both consoles, English and German, desktop and phone.
The claims this program makes are geometric, so they are checked with
geometry rather than by looking at screenshots.
What it found, which is the reason it exists:
- `SettingsCard as="section"` sat one spacing step tighter than its
neighbour on every desktop width. The `<Card>`-backed variant inherits
`gap-4 md:gap-6`; the landmark variant wrote a flat `gap-4`. Seventy-five
of eighty-six cards measured 24 px and eleven measured 16 px, directly
above and below each other. The expected value in the spec is a function
of the viewport for exactly this reason — a constant would have agreed
with whichever half it was written against.
- One German page subtitle wrapped to a second line where English fit on
one. Shortened in all six languages.
After both: heading top 24.0 px on every route, spread 0.0 px, in both
languages and at both widths — that is the no-jump claim, measured. Card
header-to-body distance equals the card's own gap on all 86 cards, and no
card body sits off the card's inner edge.
The header's HEIGHT is pinned only where one line is achievable. At 393 px a
70-character sentence needs about 380 px of column, so most explainers wrap
there; the spec asserts the wrap away at desktop width and only forbids a
third line on a phone. The alternative is truncating the sentence, which is
the defect this program removed.
Marc-André Bombeck