Six suites pinned the old rule as the rule. Each inversion, and why it is
one:
`breadth.test.ts` — the case table asserted a refusal reason per set; it
asserts a tier and a `physiological` flag now. Every row in it except the
empty set used to be a refusal, and each is a number somebody gets to see.
Adds the tier boundaries (one pillar, two areas, physiological-absent), a
case proving the same pillars produce the same number at `partial` and at
`full`, and a block whose only job is the counter-case: the empty verdict
still carries a reason and no tier, and a composite whose selected pillars
all came back short still refuses with `no_usable_data`. A rule that has
stopped refusing anything is a deleted rule, not a graded one.
`composite.test.ts` — "requires three domains and one measured
physiological domain" asserted the refusal that no longer happens; it now
asserts the score and the basis block on the same fixture. The coverage
case keeps its fixture and its arithmetic and flips its outcome: two of
three used to be a refusal and is a scored account with a real coverage
fraction. Adds the one-area case and the zero-pillar counter-case, and the
`SCORE_VERSION` floor moves 2 -> 3 because widening who gets a score is
exactly the kind of change that must not ship without a version bump.
`record.test.ts` — "records nothing when the composite did not resolve"
used a two-pillar fixture to prove a below-the-floor day stored nothing.
That day has a number now and the table has to keep it, or an account that
starts narrow and widens later has a hole where its early days were. The
assertion is now that a one-pillar day builds a draft AND reaches the
database; the absence case survives on the fixture that genuinely produces
no score.
`composition-source.test.ts` — three recipes asserted as refused at read
time. Two of them score. What the block proves is unchanged — the reader
publishes the shared rule's verdict on the reader's own resolved set, so a
second copy of the rule would still surface here — but the agreement is
over a tier rather than over a refusal.
`route.test.ts` (score config) — the two too-narrow refusals become
acceptances, because a write that refuses what the read is willing to serve
is the two layers disagreeing. The empty selection keeps its 422 and gains
the assertions the old cases carried: errorCode, reason, and the sentence.
The errorCode driver loses the two selections that no longer 422.
`score-refusal-consumer-guard.test.ts` — its non-zero control anchored on
`three_domains_required`; it anchors on `no_pillars_selected`.
New: `health-score-basis-additive-contract.test.ts` pins that `scoreBasis`
is published, is optional on all three carriers, and points at the one
shared component — a required field on a cached surface would invalidate
every cached payload with nothing failing anywhere. It also pins that the
walk does not confuse the composite's basis with the older per-pillar
`scoreBasis` that blood pressure uses for its axis, since they share a key.
Fixtures: the notice-key assertions derive the method half from
`SCORE_VERSION` rather than restating 3. Three fixtures that named
`three_domains_required` now name `no_usable_data`, a reason the server can
still emit. The settings e2e drove its refusal through a two-pillar
selection that now succeeds; it deselects every pillar instead.
The score-composition settings grouped its topics under domain headings
(Heart and metabolism, Activity, Sleep, Body shape, Wellbeing). Remove
them and list the individual topics one under another with hairline
dividers, the way the health profile lists its facts. Each row keeps its
domain data attribute, so the flattening preserves the registry order and
tests still address a pillar by its domain. The now-orphaned domain-label
map and its six-locale strings go with it.
Eight test and fixture files hardcoded scoreVersion: 2, a value the
constant has not held since v1.35.0. Now they import SCORE_VERSION and
use it, so a future bump cannot leave a fixture pinned to a stale
number.
The one genuinely historical case (record.test.ts, proving the input
fingerprint moves when the algorithm version moves) now derives both
its "previous" and "current" markers from SCORE_VERSION instead of two
unrelated literals, so the pair keeps its meaning after the next bump.
It could never score. The schema records VO2max but cannot tell a
measured test apart from a device estimate, so every fitness row reached
the scorer unproven and was refused - the pillar has never produced a
value on any account. Listing it on the score settings page as a thing
you can choose, with a line admitting it does nothing, was chrome over a
switch that changed no number.
So it leaves the catalogue: no pillar id, no domain, no scorer, no row,
no wire field. A stored selection that still names it reads back fine -
the resolver has always filtered stored ids against the catalogue and
drops what it no longer knows, so nobody's saved recipe throws or is
discarded over it.
That also fixes the page claiming unsaved changes forever. The save
stripped the fitness pillar out of the selection on its way to the
server, so the answer that came back could never match the form that
sent it, and 'All pillars' left the save button lit no matter how often
you pressed it.
The shell renders the heading pair twice under distinct ids, one column
hidden below the medium breakpoint and one hidden above it, so exactly one is
ever on screen. The spec asserted the desktop id alone: green on the wide
project, red on the narrow one against a heading that is hidden by design.
It now follows whichever of the two the viewport reveals, and asserts that
exactly one is visible, so a real duplicate would still fail.
The composite's coverage counts distinct areas of health, not pillars.
The learning line called them pillars, so an account recording blood
pressure, glycaemia and cholesterol read that it had one eligible pillar
while three sat in front of it. The count was right and stays; the noun
was wrong.
The meter beneath the score carried the same confusion further. Its
fraction is the three-area minimum the score requires, and a score only
exists once that floor is met, so it rendered as full coverage for every
account that has one. The arithmetic is untouched. Below the floor the
fraction is a real number and is shown as one; at or above it, the floor
is stated. The dots and the percentage were always honest, they track how
much history is behind the number, and they stay.
Both are held down by an AST guard rather than a text search, with a
counter-test for the neighbouring lines that are legitimately about
pillars and legitimately about a real fraction.
Marc-André Bombeck