Commit Graph
2 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Marc-André BombeckandClaude Opus 4.7 a3b0dc920b test(consent): pin endpoint behaviour and append-only invariant
Cases covered:

- POST 401 unauth, 400 invalid kind, 400 non-ISO signedAt, 400 oversize
  artefact (>64 KB), 200 inserts row + strips artefact from response.
- GET 401, 400 invalid kind, null when nothing granted, latest row by
  kind, full keyspace projection when ?kind is omitted.
- DELETE 401, flips revokedAt on the latest active row, idempotent
  no-op when nothing to revoke, master toggle revokes per-kind.

The headline test is the append-only invariant: a revoke + re-grant
cycle leaves the original row in place (with revokedAt set), mints a
fresh row, and a subsequent GET points at the re-grant — never at the
revoked predecessor. Prisma's `delete` is asserted to never be called
on a receipt, which is the legal-team guarantee the audit trail relies
on.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-21 11:49:22 +02:00
Marc-André BombeckandClaude Opus 4.7 d6809e3d54 feat(consent): POST + GET + DELETE endpoints at /api/consent/ai
Wires the iOS onboarding + Settings "AI deaktivieren" flow to the
persistence layer landed in the previous commit:

- POST /api/consent/ai — accepts { kind, artefact, signedAt }, persists
  a fresh receipt, returns id + serialised row (artefact stripped from
  the response so the signed token doesn't echo over network paths it
  doesn't need to cross).

- GET /api/consent/ai/latest?kind=… — latest non-revoked receipt for
  the given kind. Omit ?kind to get the full three-kind keyspace
  keyed by kind, with null slots for kinds the user hasn't granted.

- DELETE /api/consent/ai/latest?kind=… — flips revokedAt on the
  latest active row. Idempotent: a no-op returns 200 with null receipt
  rather than 404 so the iOS toggle can hammer the endpoint without
  spurious error states. Omit ?kind for the master "deaktivieren alle
  KI-Funktionen" sweep across every kind.

Both grant + revoke write to auditLog so the trail is reconstructible
even if the receipts table is rebuilt from a backup.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-21 11:49:11 +02:00