The day count was the length of the labelled run inside the calendar
grid, so the same day read as day 11 over a month and day 23 over three:
the run was cut off at the window's edge rather than at the cycle's
start. That was a latent contract question while every caller asked for
the same ninety days, and it stopped being latent when the month grid
began reading its own month, which is thirty days by construction.
The verdict now anchors on the period start the record holds and falls
back to walking the grid only when no caller supplied one, so the ring's
arcs stay grid-derived (they are about what can be drawn) while the day
is about what the person logged. The overdue ceiling then measures the
real elapsed count too.
Covers D-list edge 15, both shapes: a window that clips the run and a
window that excludes the cycle start altogether.
The constants make ovulation minus five through ovulation plus one, and
the comment above them claimed a six-day window. Wilcox's six days are
the five before ovulation plus the day itself, measured against a KNOWN
ovulation day. Ours is estimated, usually by back-calculating a luteal
length from a median cycle, so a window drawn tight to the estimate
loses its last day whenever the estimate lands early, and the ovum stays
viable for most of a day after release besides.
The direction is decided by who reads the window. It is surfaced to
people trying to conceive and to people avoiding it, and for the second
group a window one day short is a window that misses. The constants keep
the conservative reading and the comment now states it, with the note
that changing either one is a coordination matter because the iOS client
reimplements the same spec.
The width is pinned by a test rather than left to be re-read off the
numbers the code already uses.
MenstrualCycle rows were only ever written by the one-tap period
boundary. Every other way of recording bleeding wrote a day-log and
stopped there: the log sheet's flow chips, the bulk drain, an Apple
Health export full of menstrual-flow samples. The engine reads cycle
rows, so a person could log every period they had and the module still
held that none had happened. No cycle length, no forecast, an empty
chart, and an offer to log a first period. An Apple Health user who
never found the one-tap button had the whole module dead.
A first bleeding day now opens the cycle it belongs to, through one
shared seam in the day-log write helper, so the single capture, the
bulk drain and the Apple Health fold all infer a start the same way and
the one-tap boundary's own write lands on a date that already has a
cycle, which the rule declines.
The rule is conservative, because a false start corrupts every length
derived after it. Spotting does not open a cycle: it is as often the
tail or the herald of a period as its first day. Bleeding flagged as
between periods does not, since that flag exists to say so. Neither does
a bleeding day within the hard physiological minimum of an existing
start, which is what keeps day three of a period, or a forgotten day
two, from starting a cycle of its own without needing a contiguity
check. A genuinely short cycle is not inferred from flow alone; the
one-tap start still opens one on any date.
An edit is symmetric. Setting a flow opens the cycle; clearing it, or
flagging it as between periods, removes the cycle that day opened and
re-opens the one before it. A cycle that an edit can create and not undo
leaves the record holding a period nothing on the day says happened.
- the period route's start arm and the flow inference now share one
boundary helper, so a start means the same thing however it is entered
- back-dating re-anchors both neighbours, as the one-tap start does
- integration: eleven cases through the real routes, of which five are
about what must NOT open a cycle
The page reads one window anchored on today, ninety days back and half a
year forward, and the month grid navigates freely past it. A month
outside the window came back with no days: the cells still rendered
(they come from the month, not the read) and still opened the log sheet,
and the write behind it still landed, because the period route is built
for back-dating and re-anchors the neighbouring cycles for it. What did
not happen is anything visible. Saving an April flow in August closed
the sheet onto a month the read never carried, so the entry looked like
it had not been made, and entering it again did not help.
The grid now reports the month it moved to and gets its own bounded read
for it. The anchored window is untouched, because every other surface on
the page means today and the route caps a span at 400 days, so a union
with a month two years back would simply be refused.
A write also says so now. Saving, deleting and both period boundaries
raise a confirmation; the sheet's inline strip already named a failure.
Between the invisible month and the silent success there was no way to
tell a save that worked from one that never happened.
The sheet header carries the date it is writing to, and the one-tap
boundaries drop the word today when the day is not today. It always
wrote to the selected date; saying otherwise made a correction read as a
mistake.
The gear beside the log button is gone. It was a second door to the tab
directly below it and no other page carries one in that corner.
- calendar days carry isCycleStart, so the delete dialog can say that
removing this day removes the period start with it
- window arithmetic is a pure module with its own tests, including the
400-day span the anchor cannot be widened past
- integration: a day 111 back is written, is absent from the anchored
read, and comes back complete on a window over its month
- new strings in all six languages
The cold-start gate suppresses the calendar's phase band until three
cycles are observed, because a population-framed phase word off one or
two of them is not earned. The verdict read the day count off those same
labels, so the gate took the count with it: a record holding three
logged period starts resolved INSUFFICIENT_DATA and rendered an empty
ring under an offer to log a first period.
The count is not the claim the gate is about. It is the number of days
since a start the person entered themselves. The verdict now takes that
start from the cycle rows and falls back to counting from it whenever
today carries no phase, with the same overdue ceiling and no phase
claim. INSUFFICIENT_DATA is left for the case that really is one: no
period start on record at or before today.
The sheet's day header was already written for this state and could
never reach it — it renders a bare day number when no phase is
trustworthy.
- verdict round trip covers the still-learning day count and its overdue
side through the real route
- unit tests pin the anchor path, the absent-from-grid path, and that a
future-dated start is not a cycle anyone is in
Opening a cycle closes the one before it: the start write stamps the
previous cycle's endDate and lengthDays, and a back-filled start takes
its own end from its successor. Nothing undid any of that. Deleting the
start left the previous cycle as a closed torso holding an end date from
a cycle that no longer existed, and a record whose last cycle is closed
has no open cycle to forecast from — the prediction went away and there
was no way to bring it back from the app.
Both removal paths now re-derive the boundary from the cycles that
remain: a cycle ends the day before the next one begins, and with no
next one it is open again. That is a re-derivation rather than an undo
log, so it is correct for a history that came from an import or a
restore, and running it twice changes nothing the second time.
Deleting the day-log that opened a cycle now removes that cycle too.
The one-tap start writes both rows and the log sheet's delete is the
only way the web offers to take it back; leaving the cycle standing was
how the broken state survived the undo.
- soft-delete and re-anchor run in one transaction
- the audit row names the neighbour's moved boundary, the only part of
the write the tombstone cannot reconstruct
- round trip through the real routes: photograph the cycle rows, log the
start, remove it either way, compare field by field — including that
the forecast comes back
The engine ended the open cycle's phase window at the predicted next
start, so the day after a missed forecast carried no phase at all and
the verdict resolver read that as today falling outside every known
cycle window. An ordinary three-days-late period therefore reported
INSUFFICIENT_DATA: no cycle day, no phase, an empty ring and the words
insufficient data, while the reminder cron was pushing a period-confirm
prompt for the same day. OVERDUE was only reachable when the engine
itself forecast a cycle longer than the grace window.
The open cycle now runs to the predicted start or through today,
whichever is later, and stops the moment the next start is logged. The
count is bounded on the far side where it already was: past the typical
length plus its grace window the verdict degrades to OVERDUE and says
how late the period is.
The extension pins the open cycle's ovulation anchor to the predicted
length. Left to the span, an unconfirmed ovulation is back-calculated
from the window's own length, so a window that grows with the delay
would walk the estimate and every phase boundary drawn from it.
- buildPhaseCycles, phaseForDate and buildPhaseDayMap take the user's
today; the insights route and the coach snapshot pass it
- verdict round-trip covers the predicted start day, three days past it,
past the grace window, and the case where a new start closes the run
Maximizing the Coach drawer hands the conversation to /coach and carries
?doc= with it, so browser-Back can rebuild the sheet. That is the one
close-shaped transition whose whole point is to LEAVE the selection where
it is, and the close path has always returned early for it.
The dropped-traversal check added beside that close did not know. It saw
a closed sheet and a selection still in the address bar, which is exactly
the state it exists to repair, and it repaired away the return URL a
quarter of a second after the close had deliberately preserved it.
Whether it won that race was a question about how fast the machine
navigated, so it surfaced as one flaky run on the narrow viewport rather
than as a broken feature.
Both sides read one named predicate now, and the check is skipped when
the close kept the selection on purpose. Proved by driving the grace
window to zero, which is the worst case the timer can have: before, the
maximize never even reached /coach, three attempts out of three; after,
it passes there and the whole documents family passes with it. Twenty
consecutive runs of that family on the narrow viewport are clean.
The scope mirror is watched so a switch this browser did not begin still
holds every shell until /me reconciles it: another tab on an older
bundle, the referential action behind an account deletion, an operator.
It recognised its own by comparing the mirrored scope against the scope
it was switching to, and that is not a true test. fetchMe mirrors
whatever record the server currently reports and it runs DURING a switch,
both when postSwitchWithReconcile reconciles a lost compare-and-set and
when a second tab reloads beside the initiator. At that moment the server
still reports the record being left, so the write did not match and was
read as somebody else's switch.
What followed was silent. A foreign write publishes a new transition id,
and every terminal call opens by checking the id it was handed, so the
commit that followed was dropped without a trace and the expected scope
was left naming a record no /me would ever confirm. Nothing could release
the hold, and both tabs sat behind the hydration gate until the stored
transition aged out thirty seconds later.
That is the intermittent browser failure that has been carried through
three rounds as a canary and never explained: a peer reload racing a
switch, a gate that never lifts, and a run forty-six seconds long made of
a fifteen-second wait and a thirty-second one. On the selection that
provokes it, eight runs failed three times before and twenty failed none
after, and the runs that used to take fifty-seven seconds now take
twenty-five.
A write is foreign only when nothing of this browser's own is in flight.
Ignoring it while held costs nothing, because a held browser is already
in the state that branch would install. The rule is a named function so
it can be checked in a suite that has no DOM, and the property the guard
exists for is pinned beside it: a response that disagrees with a
committed scope is stale and still must not release.
Closing a card-opened document asks the browser to go back, so the entry
the selection pushed is consumed and the reader's next Back reaches the
page before it. A traversal is a request, not a guarantee: one asked for
while another is still settling can be dropped, and nothing raises when
it is. The sheet closes, React stays consistent, and the address bar goes
on naming a document nobody has open, so a reload or a shared link
re-opens the sheet that was just closed.
Pressing Escape straight after the browser's Forward button is exactly
that shape, and it reproduces: ten repeats across both viewports failed
two of twenty with the URL still carrying the id, and none of twenty once
the close verifies itself. The check is guarded by the document id, so a
traversal that landed on a different selection is left alone, and it is
cancelled the moment the sheet re-opens.
The browser test that found it could not say so. It asserted the sheet
was closed through a locator matched on the document TITLE, and the sheet
falls back to an untitled label while its detail read is pending, so the
assertion also passed on an open sheet showing a skeleton, resolved
immediately instead of waiting, and pushed the failure into a URL poll
ten seconds later. It now asserts the dialog role, which is what the
neighbouring deep-link test already does.
The dead-code gate has been red on this branch since the sharing refusal
contracts landed. Neither name is new and neither was noticed, because
knip is not in the local gate.
consentRequiredResponse lost its last caller when every delegable route
started sharing one 403 description through recordRefusal(); the AI
consent sentence it wrapped is still used and stays, with a note at the
constant saying why there is no response object beside it any more.
mutateThenRestore was written with the sharing security fixtures and has
never been called.
No ignore entries: an export with no consumer is the thing the gate is
for.
Zod 4's .meta() is immutable: it returns a new schema carrying the
metadata and registers that one. Four request bodies in the sharing
family called it as a statement and dropped the result, so the route
table went on referencing the bare schema, the bodies were emitted
inline and anonymous, and the object-level descriptions never reached
docs/api/openapi.yaml. One of them carries the clause that scopes every
rule on the invitation endpoint to an invited grant, which is the
sentence that stops a reader carrying the step-up and the refusals
across to a guardian grant.
Bind each to a const, reference the const, and correct the level
boundary in the invitation's description while it is being published:
it still carried the blanket denial that stopped being true when the
anamnesis surface opened to a manage delegate.
The wire format does not move. Four named components appear and the four
bodies point at them; the fields, the types and the requiredness are
what they were. A new guard asserts every id this route table declares
reaches the built document, because the failing form looks exactly like
the working one.
The eight journeys were enumerated and one of them was wired. The other
seven existed as claims in a fixture file, which is the gap the enumeration
was written to close: a browser suite reports what it ran, never what it did
not, and a journey nobody wired reads exactly like a journey that passed.
All eight are wired now, and the list is checked in both directions — an
enumerated journey missing from the wiring fails, not just a wiring entry
naming a journey nobody declared. Before this, a subset was legal, so a
dropped journey and a not-yet-written one looked the same.
A journey names more than one file where more than one file carries it. J1
claims a grant runs through invite, accept, switch, expiry, revoke and a
direct URL; the browser proves the switch, what each level opens and the
direct-URL refusal, and the transitions either side are database facts
proved against real Postgres. Folding that into one file would mean a
browser spec driving expiry through the clock or an integration file
asserting what a page renders, and both are worse tests than the two that
exist.
Three journeys ride Playwright and five ride Vitest, so a green run of this
guard means all eight are claimed and here is which have executed in the
ordinary gate — never that all eight passed. The runner is derived from the
path rather than trusted, so it cannot become a label set to whichever value
made the split read better.
The extractor now reads `it(` as well as `test(`, and the parameterised
`it.each(table)("title")` form alongside the single-call one. It saw neither
before: five of the journeys are proved by Vitest files, every per-file leg
is over a matched set, and an empty match set satisfied them all. The
synthetic spec that proves the parse grew a Vitest half, and it is what
caught the parameterised form being invisible. What the matcher still cannot
see is written into its own doc comment.
The floor was described on the one route that cannot reach it and left unsaid
on the two that answer it every time: withdrawing the last Guardian grant and
renouncing it both raise `managed_profile.guardian.required`, and both
published only 'that access had already ended'. Both 409s now name their two
codes, and the annotation on the removal route enumerates all four emitters
rather than three.
A guard closes the class rather than the instance: every route module that
raises the refusal must publish it on its own operation, with the emitters
discovered from the sources.
The freeze guard gains its containment leg — a module becomes delegable by
review, not by discovery, so every file contributing a fenced verb has to be a
member of one of the surface guard's frozen allowlists.
Freezes the authority split the third level ships with. A token exercises a
MANAGE grant, and a Guardian's authority over a managed profile, exactly as a
browser does — proved at the resolver, where neither had a Bearer case before.
A token cannot offer MANAGE and cannot create a managed profile at all, because
both gates resolve through the session cookie; the second had no test until now,
and it runs against a real database with a wildcard token to make the width of
the permission irrelevant.
The claim set is held together by a map naming, per claim, the file and the test
title that proves it, so removing any one of them fails rather than quietly
narrowing what a native client may do.
The fence's client-facing half is frozen beside it: the account payload publishes
the record context on a cookie session and null on a token, and the published
contract says so under the same header names the server matches on.
Runs the legacy whole-record decoder over the entries `resolveAccountAccess`
actually produces, rather than over the fixture objects that describe them: the
existing case proves both ends and never the assembly between them, which is the
shape of test this project keeps rediscovering. Whole READ and WRITE decode,
MANAGE decodes as write and never above the level it confers, a scoped grant is
refused rather than read as the whole record, and a stored scope the server
cannot parse reads as nothing on both ends.
The canonical readers are driven over the same server-built entry, so
`level`, `sections` and `recordKind` are proved to survive the trip to the
capability resolver. The account-payload guard gains the pair for
`recordSession`: a field whose only reader is the transport type is exactly
what that guard exists to catch.
Every route that resolves a record through the sharing fence can answer 403
`sharing.access.denied`, and until now that fact was published on the selector
header and on none of the 120 operations that produce it. All 120 carry it now,
byte for byte, from one constant: the refusal is deliberately indistinguishable
across a missing account, a missing grant, a scope that does not reach the
surface and a read grant on a write, so 120 paraphrases would invite a client to
tell apart what the server refuses to.
Where a delegable route already answered 403 for its own reason — a module
gate, the cycle gate, AI consent — the two share one description rather than one
of them going unpublished, since OpenAPI allows a single response per status.
The guard recomputes the delegable set from the route sources on every run and
classifies per verb, which matters: seventeen modules have a delegable read
beside a write that refuses a switch outright.
The contract already pointed at them: the Guardian roster names
`DELETE /api/managed-profiles/{id}/guardians/{grantId}` as the route its
`grantId` is for, and that route was not in the spec. Creation, deletion,
invitation and removal now are, with the two bodies moved to
`src/lib/validations` so the wire shape has one source.
Three things are stated rather than left to be discovered:
- the two refusals on the invitation that carry no `meta.errorCode`, and the
order a client must resolve in because of them
- the last-Guardian 409 on the removal route, which nothing can elicit through
that route today, published with the reason
- that the sentences on the ordinary invitation describe an invited grant only,
so a client cannot carry its MANAGE rules across to a Guardian grant
- publish the roster's entry from the invitation and `{ grantId, revokedAt }`
from the removal, instead of the account-grant row Prisma returned
- drop the invitation's self refusal: it named a code no request can elicit,
because a Guardian grant's grantor is the profile and never the caller
- name the duplicate grant error rather than catching every grant refusal into
a sentence that would be wrong for any other one
- keep the rate limit and the unknown-identifier 404 free of an error code,
as their siblings elsewhere are, and say why at the call site
- bound profile creation at ten an hour per account, the ceiling its
guardian sibling has carried since it shipped
- distinguish a failed roster read from a slow one, with the way back
- cover the three caller states the roster read has to refuse: an
unaccepted invitation, an expired grant, and MANAGE held elsewhere
- cover what deletion does to a guardian standing inside the record
recordKindLabel chooses between two sentences that mean different things
and nothing could fail it: the journey asserted the data attribute, which
that function never reads, so inverting the arms left the suite green
while a guardian standing inside a managed profile was told it was an
ordinary shared record.
- deleting a profile and ending a guardian's access resolve fresh MFA,
and both sit behind a confirmation, so the request that reaches the
server is minutes old and routinely outside the five-minute window
- an account with no second factor is told where to set one up instead
of being asked to confirm one it does not have
- the arm is scoped to those two acts: a 401 on accept, revoke or
renounce is a lapsed session and must not read as a factor prompt
- a refused field gets its own announced node in content contrast; the
standing hint stays muted beside it, rather than being overwritten
- the timezone refusal is the only explanation for a submit button that
will not press, so it leaves the picker's muted hint slot
- drive creation, the switcher entry, the managed banner and the return
trip in a real browser, plus the guardian roster and the floor stated
before an invitation is accepted
- seed a guardian account with a second factor and refresh its step-up
before the journey acts, since no fixture could reach a step-up-gated
route before this
- tie the journey id to its test titles, so a marker that goes missing
fails a check rather than vanishing from a run nobody counted
- give the delegated-action inventory a leg that can falsify its level
axis: the walked module set must strictly exceed the manage-only one,
anchored on a route that never asks for manage
- declare AUDIT_LOG_RETENTION_DAYS and SESSION_COOKIE_SECURE in the env
manifest, so the pre-deploy check reports the two settings operators
are told to set, and hold manifest, compose whitelist and both example
files in step
- list who looks after a profile, invite another guardian and end an
existing access from the profile's own row
- state the last-guardian floor from the real roster before the act, and
say plainly that an invitation counts only once it is accepted
- give each of the invitation refusals its own sentence, branching on
status for the two the route sends without an error code
- cover every call the card can make against the real routes
- confirm before deleting, naming what goes and that it cannot be undone
- state how many people lose the record, taken from the guardian roster
rather than assumed to be one
- say that deleting is the way out when you are the last guardian, since
this route sends no last-guardian refusal
- announce a refused deletion on the profile's own row, retryable
- add GET /api/managed-profiles/{id}/guardians, cookie-only, refusing
anybody who is not an active guardian of that profile with the same 404
an unknown id gets
- disclose the grant id, the party block already shared between grant
parties, the derived state and the two timestamps, and nothing else
- publish the route in the OpenAPI contract
- add a managed-profile card to Settings -> Shared access, between the
invitation card and the standing-state cards
- collect exactly the four fields the create route accepts, with the date
of birth genuinely optional and never derived from a year
- refresh the account payload on success, so the new record reaches the
switcher and the banner without a reload
- assert the section is reachable for an owner and refused for a Guardian
inside a profile and for an adult manager
The privacy dashboard re-implemented the audit-retention resolver with its own
default and its own floor. Two implementations of one disclosure, quoted to the
same person on two pages and by the purge job; it uses the shared resolver now.
The record-content branch in the settings gate matched a classification rather
than a page, so a second manage-writable destination would have rendered the
allergy and family-history managers under its own heading without anybody
choosing that. It resolves through a slug map, and the contract test fails if
the map and the classification disagree in either direction — a destination
cannot join the kind without somebody deciding what it renders.
The managed-profile nav filter assumed a guardian grant is always manage. It is
today, which is why the check was easy to leave out; an entry below that level
would have listed destinations the gate refuses.
Interpolation used a replacement string, and String.replace reads $&, $`, $',
$1 and $$ out of one. A display name containing $' rewrote the sentence around
it — and display names land in exactly the sentences that say who did what in
somebody's health record. A replacer function has no $ grammar at all, which
removes the class rather than escaping the members of it somebody thought of.
Two sentences promised that a manage grant reaches no settings at all. Both
were true when they were written and stopped being true when the anamnesis
destination opened, and both are in the worst places for a stale promise: one
is the access description generated into the public contract and read by the
native client, the other is the paragraph a delegate meets on a page sharing
does not cover.
Both now name the boundary the code draws — record content versus account
configuration — and say which part of the record a manage grant reaches. What
stays with the account owner is spelled out rather than implied: login, the
second factor, provider connections, tokens, notification routing, module and
threshold configuration, and who else has access.
A guard checks the copy against the classification rather than against itself,
so opening a second destination or closing this one moves the sentence with it.
The contract is regenerated.
The revoke dialog tells an owner that "who entered what" stays answerable for
N days, and the activity list prints the same number under its heading. The
query behind that list had no date filter: on an instance whose retention was
shortened it showed rows the sentence said were already gone, and the number
was a caption over an unbounded read rather than its limit. It is the filter
now, resolved once so the bound and the sentence cannot drift apart.
The list also stopped at a hundred rows and said nothing about it, which is the
more dangerous of the two silences — an owner who scrolls to the bottom reads
the oldest visible line as the beginning, and a busy household reaches the cap
in a fraction of the window. The response says which of the two limits it hit,
and the view states it only when it did: a caveat that is always on is one
people learn to skip.
The self-hosting page said an empty list means nobody opened the record. It
means nobody did so within the window. Corrected, with the row cap named
alongside it.
AUDIT_LOG_RETENTION_DAYS is not only enforced, it is published: the
shared-access panel prints the window under the activity list, and the dialog
that ends somebody else's access states how long "who entered what" stays
answerable. Both read the value the server resolved. It was missing from the
compose environment: whitelist and from both example files, so an operator who
set 90 got 365 told to every user, in a sentence about their own data.
That block is a whitelist and Compose substitutes from .env regardless, which
is what makes the variable look configured while never arriving — the same
shape as the session-cookie flag in v1.5.2. A guard now covers the three places
an operator meets such a variable, and its control leg found that the cookie
flag itself is still absent from the production example. Documented there too.
Every delegable route files a breadcrumb when a request does not parse, and it
files it through auditLog on purpose: that helper is what stamps the actor, and
without the stamp a delegate's malformed request would read as the owner's own.
The rows are meant to be attributable. None of them had a sentence, so all of
them rendered in the owner's activity view as "made a change in your record" —
including one a view-only delegate can trigger by sending a query the route
cannot parse. Nothing had changed and nothing could have.
Thirty-three actions now have honest lines. A refusal says it was an attempt
and says it was refused; it never borrows the language of something that
happened. Two of them are filed by library modules the routes import — a
background import's completion row and a medication lifecycle reconciliation —
and a walk over route files alone could not see either.
The inventory guard was asking a different question from the feed. It kept only
awaited audit calls while the feed shows fire-and-forget rows identically, and
it read route files while the feed shows whatever the request reached. Both
criteria now match the feed's, the three rows the feed structurally cannot show
are excluded by name with the reason written down, and the exclusion list is
pinned at three. A leg asserts the shape of the sentence for every refusal, so
a future arm cannot map an attempt onto an ordinary verb and pass on coverage.
The whole round trip is covered against real Postgres: a view-only delegate
sends a malformed query, the row lands attributed to them under the owner, and
the sentence the owner reads is an attempt.
POST /api/allergies and POST /api/family-history have resolved
requireRecordAuth("manage", "profile") since the level shipped, while the only
form in the product that posts to either sat behind a Settings destination
classified unavailable. The write was admitted, audited and owner-scoped, and
nobody could reach it — the one-ended change this repository keeps
rediscovering, with the permission shipped and the surface left as a follow-up.
The destination now carries a classification that means what the routes mean:
reachable by everybody they already admit, which is a guardian inside the
profile they administer and an adult delegate holding manage. The four places
that decided visibility on the guardian-only literal were each updated
deliberately, and the shell that refused every settings path in an adult share
now admits exactly the destinations classified as record content. Record
configuration — modules, thresholds, notification routing — stays with the
owner at every level.
The page inside a record is its own component holding the two managers whose
routes answer for a delegate. Mounting the personal section would have put
three more forms on screen that refuse on submit. The family-history card says
whose statement the row is, which the route comment could not.
Both routes carried a long paragraph arguing the write was deliberately
unreachable. It is gone rather than left to send the next reader back to close
what this opens.
The integration coverage moves from the undeclared-mode refusal to a manage
contract: a manage delegate and a guardian each write and the row lands under
the owner with the delegate named as actor, while read and write delegates get
the insufficient-access refusal. Nothing exercised either route at manage
before.
The shared-record accessibility suite had four tests for five states: success
and empty shared one, and neither of them ever entered an empty state. A
browser run reports what it ran and never what it did not, so a state nobody
wrote a test for produced exactly the same output as a state that passed.
The five states are enumerated in a fixture, each test names its state, and a
fast guard reads the spec back against the list — a state that loses its test,
its anchor, or one of its proofs now fails in the ordinary gate rather than at
the point somebody notices the spinner is silent.
Every state runs four proofs: an axe scan, the document reading order, either
a keyboard reach with a visible focus indicator or a live-region announcement
for the one state with nothing to press, and, where the copy is something a
person has to act on, that it renders as content rather than as muted meta and
clears the contrast floor. The retry control on the read-failure card gained a
stable slot so the keyboard proof targets the affordance rather than its
wording.
The eight release journeys are enumerated in the same fixture.
Accepting, revoking and handing back a grant had no failure rendering at all.
The request came back refused, or never left the machine, and the panel did
nothing: the confirm dialog had already closed, the list did not change, and
the only signal was the absence of one. The two refusals that most need a
reader were the two that arrived most quietly — an invitation that had lapsed
before it was opened, and the last guardian being told they may not hand back
a profile that would then have nobody looking after it.
Each refusal now renders on the row it belongs to, announced, in content
contrast, beside a control that runs the same act again. The sentences are
split by what the person does next rather than by status code, so lapsed and
withdrawn read differently and the guardian refusal names the way out. A
request that never reached the server says so instead of reporting a refusal
nobody issued.
The failed state is read off the mutation rather than copied into local state
from onError: the copy is what goes stale, and the mutation already knows
which row it was for. The invitation form keeps every field it had, and only
a successful send clears them.
Every action a manage-level route files now renders as its own sentence in
the owner's activity view, in all six locales. A write delegate can only add,
so the generic "made a change" was at least the right shape of fact; a manager
changes and removes entries the owner made themselves, and the generic line
withholds the only part that matters — whether a reading was corrected or
deleted, whether a dose history was purged.
The inventory reads the routes and calls the map rather than matching `case`
in its source, so an action that falls through to the fallback fails, and it
follows each resolved key into all six bundles. Every sentence interpolates
the actor's name and nothing else: the audit table is not encrypted and a
value in a verb line would be a health figure in a second store.
The revoke dialog's retention disclosure no longer depends on which of two
requests answers first. `retentionDays` rides the grant list, so a client
holding a row to revoke holds the window it must state, and the branch that
omitted the sentence is gone.
- document srcSet, poster, object data, form action, window.open,
sendBeacon, CSS url() and spread props as shapes this matcher cannot
see, alongside the two trees it walks
- match the imperative `.src =` form, anchored to a real occurrence so
the new leg cannot pass by matching nothing
The detail sheet loaded the original twice on open — the inline preview
and the download href each fetched and decrypted the whole blob — and
for a non-inline document the old href had cost nothing until clicked.
- one loader, lifted to the sheet, and only for a document that renders
inline; everything else fetches at click time
- make the download a real disabled control that reflects a failed
fetch: href="#" with aria-disabled announces unavailable and still
activates, and it ignored the failure entirely
Removing the Vary block left the disk-layer case green: it asserted what
is IN the cache, and the claim is what the cache will SERVE. On the
external-switch path nothing wipes those entries — the app never
initiated the switch — so Vary is the only thing between a cached
delegated response and the next request under another context.
- assert cache.match() hits under the stored context and misses under
the new one; it fails when the Vary is removed
- correct the acceptance map and the client docblock to claim exactly
what executes: no zero-entry count, no offline leg
data-slot rides {...rest} onto DateField's hidden ISO input, so the
invitation spec asserted visibility on an element that can never be
visible and typed into nothing. Use the primitive's data-testid, which
lands on the overlay a person edits, and assert the mirror took the
value.
The batch path had no unique-violation handling at all, so one duplicate
anywhere in the transaction answered 500 — indistinguishable from a
server fault, and what every client retries against. The single path
narrowed with instanceof, the form prisma-errors.ts exists to replace.
A shared cache is one reverse proxy away, and without Vary the first one
to appear would key a delegated record response on URL alone and hand it
to the next request under a different context. Appends rather than
replaces, so a route that already varies keeps what it had.
- the idempotency arm refuses only a wrongly-asserted context; an admin
route behind unfenced requireAdmin still serves a headerless request
- the epoch trigger does not fire on a statement that names record_epoch
without moving the selector; the source guard is what covers that
- keep the record entries until /api/auth/me has answered: clearing the
cache under a mounted observer made the held tab refetch at once
- exclude the account cell from the cancellation, and swallow a repeat
trigger, so a burst of 409s cannot kill the request that ends the hold
- read the account payload network-only; the default staleTime would
have returned the very context the browser was told is wrong
A selector pointed at a record whose grant has lapsed reports the same
disagreement on every /api/auth/me, so routing it to the hydration gate
rendered a permanent spinner with no controls. Expiry reaches this state
on its own: revocation clears the selector inside its transaction and
expiry does not.
- treat an unprovable context as a refusal, which paints the door with
the button back to one's own record
- check the refusal ahead of the hydration gate, so neither trigger can
render behind a spinner again
A browser-issued <img src>, <iframe src> or <a href download> cannot
carry the record-session assertion, so the fence refused all three on
any session that had been inside a shared record — permanently, since
none of them will ever send a header.
- add a structural guard: no client file may name a record-fenced route
in a src=, href= or window.location sink
- fetch the thumbnail, the inline preview and the download through the
app transport and hand the DOM an object URL, revoked on unmount
- make the two API probes in the managed-profiles browser spec assert
the same context the app beside them asserts
- give every acceptance case a stable id and assert the mapping from a
runnable artifact, recording which cases execute in the ordinary gate
and which await the browser stage
- add the browser spec for the cases no cooperative layer can reach:
peers reconciling to an exact context, an aborted switch response, a
closed initiator, a delayed response, and the offline disk layers
- attach the asserted context to every same-origin request inside the
three fetch entries, so no call site classifies itself
- discard a response whose echoed context contradicts the adopted one;
serve one that carries no echo, which is what keeps the public poll
and every actor surface working
- adopt from /api/auth/me and the switch response, and from nothing else
- send the epoch on every switch and retry once after reconciling
- hold and reconcile on the 409 instead of leaving the record
Marc-André Bombeck