POST /api/consent/ai/web now accepts an optional { intent } body. Without
one (the AI-settings mount heal) a standing revocation still blocks the
mint; intent "affirmative" is the user's own consent act and may
supersede an earlier revocation, exactly as a first grant would. The
consent card offers the explicit grant control whenever consent does not
stand, and the audit row records which intent minted the receipt.
The document auto-read opt-in already declared "affirmative" on enable;
the settings-mount heal posts no body. Both stay as they are.
The server chain existed end to end (extract stages PENDING facts, per-fact
edit clears the low-confidence gate, confirm is the only write into the
structured stores) but the document detail offered no control over any of
it: it counted observation facts and linked to Labs. A user whose automatic
staging run was skipped had to re-upload the same PDF through Labs > Scan a
report.
- The detail sheet gains a staged-facts block with honest states: pending
facts open an inline review (approve/reject per fact; a low-confidence
fact is checked and saved first via the existing per-fact edit); a
lab-filed, already-read document with nothing staged offers "Extract lab
values" over its stored text; otherwise nothing renders.
- The extract route gains { mode: "stored" }: the same text-structuring
pass the automatic worker runs, over the document's own content index.
No re-upload, no second read of the original; full gauntlet including
the shared document-AI bucket with charge-at-dispatch honesty; 422
notIndexed when no stored text exists.
- A manual "Read with AI" / "Read again" now continues into the same
lab auto-staging the background worker performs; the response reports
labFactsStaged and the toast names the values waiting for review.
- Unchecked values are rejected and the copy says so; an unverified
low-confidence fact receives no decision and stays pending rather than
being silently discarded. Confirmation remains the only write into
Labs, conditions, and medications; approved facts carry the
committedRecordId link back to the source document (existing model, no
schema change).
- The "lab values from this document" link now counts APPROVED facts
only — it claims values that actually exist in Labs.
- Copy in all six locales; OpenAPI regenerated for the new extract mode
and the index response field.
The schedule exporter enumerates columns, so the new per-schedule
units-per-dose needs adding by hand: export it as a Decimal string in
the disaster-recovery payload, accept it in the wire schema, and write
it back on restore (NULL stays NULL to inherit). Extend the round-trip
test to prove a half-tablet slot survives export and re-import.
Add schedules[].unitsPerDose to the create/update contract with the
same whole-number-or-curated-fraction validation as the medication
level, built into the Prisma data field-by-field on both the create
and the schedule-replace path. Unwrap the nullable Decimal to a JSON
number at every medication read/write response through one shared
serializer so the wire shape cannot drift, keeping NULL as NULL to
mean inherit-the-medication-level.
GET/PATCH /api/anamnesis/emergency, wrapped in apiHandler. The PATCH
validates a partial body with per-field length caps, builds the Prisma
data field-by-field from the parsed input (never a spread), narrows the
user from requireAuth rather than the body, encrypts the free text on
write, and audits the change. The GET decrypts fail-soft for the form
prefill. Registers the OpenAPI operations and schema. An integration
test reads the row back to prove the write lands.
Register the three encrypted emergency columns in the rotation registry
and the key-rotation script so a legacy-key drop cannot strand them.
Carry all six new columns through the profile backup builder and restore
(the enums by value, the free text as ciphertext in a DR payload or
decrypted plaintext in a portable export) and extend the wire schema.
The full-backup round-trip integration test seeds the six columns and
asserts each survives an export and restore.
- from the record: a document link picker on the capture form, gated on the
documents module (blanked when off, never post-filtered)
- from the upload: a VACCINATION scan offers to file against a dose recorded
within the shared ±7-day window; a single candidate pre-selects, two offer a
picker with nothing pre-selected (WR-8 seen red on the pre-select rule,
reverted by content hash), zero shows nothing, and it never blocks the upload
- the suggestion rule reuses the visit moment's window constant rather than
forking it; it registers with the shared filing module when that lands
- suggestion and link copy in six locales
- rung 2: a prefilled, user-confirmed, editable, declinable prompt writes an
ordinary VORSORGE reminder keyed on the dose's primary antigen; the
published origin enum and reminder DTO are unchanged
- idempotent by antigen — a second confirmation re-anchors the existing
reminder rather than minting a second (WR-9 seen red on the reminder count,
reverted by content hash)
- rolling day cadence so logging the next dose re-anchors the due date through
the Phase 1 satisfy matcher; the whole loop proven through real routes
- booster prompt copy in six locales, plural-aware
The visit stage's second half landed while this was in flight and both
touched the same three places. Resolved as one set: the link facade
carries the reverse document-to-visit direction and the new dose pair
side by side, the sharing literals hold both sets of admissions with the
count re-added on top, and the language bundles take the shorter module
description the trunk settled on.
- a dose needs a day and one way of naming what it was, and nothing
else; a required catalogue pick would make an old Pass line unloggable
- the write path refuses a future date and a slug the catalogue does not
offer, while storage stays tolerant so an older backup restores whole
- the DTO publishes the practitioner, the visit, the linked pages, the
catalogue entry and the derived series already resolved, in numbers
rather than localised text
- a linked page's name and date are withheld from a delegate whose grant
does not reach the vault, and the withholding says so rather than
looking like a page with no name
A lab panel files itself against the visit it came from, and never has to. The
OCR review and the manual form both offer the suggestion through the one shared
field, anchored on the draw date rather than on now, so backdating a reading
moves the offer with it. The commit writes one link PER RESULT ROW, which is
why the join is m:n: a marker re-run on a different day belongs to its own
visit. Best-effort by design — the readings are the write that matters and must
not be lost to a link that could not be made.
The condition side gets a Visits about this card with an action that pre-links
the episode. From the episode side only, and that is a decision: an episode
spans weeks and a visit is a point, so matching the other way would be wrong
often enough to teach a person to ignore every suggestion in the product.
A due checkup gains a second action beside erledigt. Filing the visit as done
satisfies the checkup through the same forward-only, idempotent primitive the
checkbox uses, so doing both is one satisfaction and no error. The two actions
answer different questions — one says it happened, the other says where.
An appointment now appears where a person looks, and NEITHER surface relaxes
the reminder-table exclusion that keeps it out of the preventive-care lists.
Both read the visit table: a quiet line under the dashboard checkup block for
anything inside two weeks, and one rail item for today or tomorrow. A diff in
either that touches origin is the wrong fix.
A visit write now also refreshes the reminder reads. Closing a checkup moves
its next-due date on three surfaces that would otherwise keep showing it due
until their own poll.
OpenAPI regenerated in the same commit.
- a new backup section reads the dose and its document link through
their own delegates and writes both ends in one file, the arrangement
the visit section already uses
- the practitioner and the visit remap to the rows the same restore put
back; the booster reminder never travels, so its reference resolves to
null and the drop is reported rather than swallowed
- the antigen slug restores verbatim: a slug the catalogue has since
dropped still says what a person was given
- the round trip seeds a dose with every optional column filled and
reads each one back, so a returning row count cannot stand in for a
returning record
Every arm here is the same shape as the one that already exists for
conditions, because the vault's filing model is settled and a second shape
would be the thing to explain rather than the thing to use: encounterIds on
upload and on PATCH with replace-set semantics, linkEncounter / unlinkEncounter
beside the episode pair in the bulk action, and an encounterId list filter.
Both directions ride ONE table. The visit's sheet writes encounter_document_links
from its end and the document reads it from the other, declared as a second
direction in the link service rather than a fourth table. A visit's kind
crosses the wire as the enum constant rather than a rendered name: unlike a
condition label, which is the person's own words, a kind is one of eight closed
values whose human name the reader's own bundle owns.
The suggestion is offered where the document is being looked at, resolved by
the shared rule rather than by this surface: one candidate pre-selects with an
undo, two offer a picker with nothing pre-selected, none offers nothing at all.
It resolves with no AI provider configured, and it renders nothing once the
document already names a visit.
The bulk verb has a caller — the vault's selection bar files a whole selection
against a visit, mirroring the condition verb and hiding itself on an account
with no visits. Nothing here is one-ended.
OpenAPI regenerated in the same commit.
A document arriving in the vault and a lab panel being committed both ask the
same question — does this belong to a visit? — and the answer has to be the
same question asked once. The rule lives in one module with one exported
window constant: the caller's live DONE or PLANNED visits within seven days of
an anchor date, resolved into a verdict rather than a list.
One candidate pre-selects, visibly, with one undo. Two or more offer a picker
with nothing pre-selected: pre-selecting the first of two is what teaches a
person to stop reading suggestions, and the return type has no field on that
arm a caller could mistake for a choice. Zero offers nothing.
Cancelled visits and no-shows are not candidates. Neither happened, so neither
produced the letter or the panel being filed, and admitting them would widen
the set with rows that are wrong most of the time — which pushes the honest
single match into the picker branch.
The verdict is served over HTTP because all three moments live in the browser.
Handing the client a windowed list and letting it decide would put the rule in
two places, and the copy in the browser is the one nobody re-reads.
- suggest-window.ts with the window as an exported constant, not a literal
- GET /api/encounters/suggest, profile domain, reviewed into the frozen literal
- OpenAPI regenerated
- fixtures are relative to the run instant; a fixed date slides out of a
relative window and rots the test into a false green
Nine visit routes and five practitioner routes, all classified under the
existing profile domain and each reviewed into the frozen sharing
literal with the sentence that argues for it. An address book of a
person's own doctors is record content, not account configuration: it
names no credential, no integration and no notification channel, which
is the fence that classification turns on. The eight sharing domains are
unchanged. Link and unlink stay bare, matching document link and unlink,
and the pair is revisited as one decision later.
Nothing is a required field. A visit saves with a date and nothing else.
Every id a body may carry is re-narrowed to the caller before anything
is written, and an unknown link id never blocks a save.
A booked visit mints exactly one reminder on the existing engine with
the new origin, and the appointment half is the part worth reading
twice. Both cadence columns stay null, which is the schema's one-shot,
so the first due instant is stamped directly and the never-nag property
is structural rather than guarded: after it fires, the cadence helper
has no occurrence to return. Rescheduling re-anchors that row and never
mints a second, which the tests assert by counting rows rather than by
checking the date moved.
Filing a visit as done closes the checkup it was filed against, on the
transition rather than on every later edit. Writing the test first found
that: satisfying is forward-only, so re-saving a completed visit was
pushing the checkup's next due date out again as if the person had been
a second time.
An appointment must appear on no preventive-care surface, and that is
four separate reads, one of them in the assistant tooling. Each carries
the exclusion, a guard proves all four by source text with a non-zero
match count, and the reminder mapper refuses such a row outright — so a
read site that loses its filter fails loudly instead of showing an
appointment as a checkup. The published origin enum is untouched.
- the completeness guard now binds a third model, MoodContext, to a named
select; the four omitted columns each carry the reason the backup is right
to drop them
- the disaster-recovery arm carries the ciphertext, the portable arm the plain
text, and every other column rides in both
- the restore rebuilds the context after its entry, inside the same
transaction, and a file written before contexts existed restores without one
- the round trip asserts the restored row by value, zero included
A person's whole 'which doctor' history was one free-text column on a
reminder: they typed the practice name once and could reach nothing else
that happened there. This turns that string into a record.
Five tables in migration 0320, all additive: an encounter that happened
or is booked, the account's own address book of practitioners, and three
links from a visit to the documents, lab results and conditions it
produced. The encounter is slim on purpose — the diagnosis stays on the
linked condition, the address on the linked practitioner, and the reason
each field was kept or cut is written at the model. No module gate, and
the schema says why rather than leaving the absence to be read as an
oversight.
Every carrier lands with the tables rather than after them. All five are
classified as travelling both ways and are proven doing it: a seeded row
of each goes out through the real export builder, the account is deleted
so the schema's cascade decides what survives, and the rows are counted
back through the real restore route. Two references deliberately do not
survive and are named instead of dropped quietly — the reminder a visit
points at is not in the backup, and a link whose far side a portable
export does not carry cannot resolve. The wipe plan deletes the links
before the lab results and documents they hang off, or the audit row
would report zero for rows that existed. The three encrypted columns are
registered for key rotation, without which dropping a legacy key would
make those notes permanently unreadable.
Widening the reminder origin enum is a type error at the reminder DTO,
which is the right outcome: the mapper now refuses an appointment row
outright rather than relabelling it as a checkup.
- moodContextSchema derives every enum from the vocabulary, so a value it does
not name answers 422 through returnAllZodIssues rather than being dropped
- the context is written in the same transaction as the entry and its links; a
failure rolls the entry back rather than leaving a client retrying a 5xx
into a duplicate
- an entry with nothing filled in stores no row, and a context that says
nothing removes the one that was there
- the create, list, detail and edit reads answer the context with its lists
decoded and its note decrypted; the ciphertext never leaves the server
The single create's upsert restated all five columns on its update arm,
so a client re-posting an entry with only a label and a timestamp — the
phone, whose build has no sliders — cleared the stress, energy,
connectedness and stability somebody had answered on the web. The batch
and import paths already preserved them, so the two disagreed.
One answer now, and it is preserve: absence in a request means nothing
to say, an explicit null takes an answer back, and pleasantness still
follows the label because the request always carries one. The create
schema accepts the null that makes clearing expressible.
A re-post that omits a dimension is asserted to leave it standing, and
that assertion has been watched to fail against the old arm.
- the backup select and the payload carry all five, on both the portable
and the disaster-recovery arm
- the restore writes what the file holds and nothing else: a file from
before these columns restores them empty rather than deriving them
- the CSV appends them after the existing columns so nothing shifts under
a spreadsheet, and an unanswered value is an empty cell rather than a
zero, which is a real answer on this scale
- the round trip asserts each of the five by value, including a zero
- one helper resolves the level-A values for a write; the five writers
call it instead of carrying their own copy of the derivation
- the create schema takes a1 to a5, and a value the user set wins over
the derived one; the batch request shape is untouched
- both arms of both upserts restate the values, so a re-post cannot
leave a stale reading beside a mood that has since changed
- the JSON import derives from the row's own label rather than the
file's score, which is the one place the two can disagree
- correcting an entry's label re-derives pleasantness the way it
re-derives the score; an explicit null takes an answer back
- a round trip through all five writers against real Postgres asserts
the rows agree and that nothing invents the other four values
- MOOD_DIMENSIONS carries the five self-state dimensions in capture order,
each with its column, its label and anchor keys, its orientation and its
0-10 bounds
- getA1ForMood maps the five-point label onto the pleasantness scale once,
so the quick check-in stays a full-value capture path
- only stress is inverse-oriented, and a test pins that count
- the secret scan reads a dotted message key on a *Key field as a token;
allowlist the dimension keys the way the existing message keys are
A lab runs its own method on its own device, so the window a physician
evaluates a value against is the one printed next to it on that report,
not a catalog band averaged over every lab. Reading a report pulled the
value and dropped that range: the extraction asked for it, the commit
handed it to the biomarker resolver, and the resolver only uses it when
it mints a NEW marker. For every analyte the user already had — the
normal case after a first panel — the printed range was read and then
thrown away.
Add `sourceReferenceLow` / `sourceReferenceHigh` / `sourceReferenceText`
to `LabResult` and carry the range from the report to the reading. The
text is stored whether or not numbers can be read out of it, because
"bis 5,0" and "negativ" state a window too; a range that could not be
parsed is kept verbatim, never replaced with invented bounds.
`resolveEffectiveReferenceRange` is the one place the precedence lives:
the source window wins for that single reading, and the catalog stays
the net for readings without one. A printed string with no derivable
bound does not displace the catalog. Every surface that judges a
reading routes through it — the API verdict, the doctor report, the
insights blocks and per-marker assessment, the coach snapshot, the MCP
read and the FHIR `referenceRange` — so a value cannot read in range on
one surface and out on another.
The API keeps `referenceLow` / `referenceHigh` as the window in force,
so a client that reads only those two renders the right range and the
right verdict with no change of its own; the catalog band, the source
window, its origin and a divergence flag ride alongside for clients
that want to show both.
Read side: the chart draws the source window as a second, visually
distinct band with the reading it came from named beneath it, the
reading rows name the printed range and the catalog band where the two
disagree, and the doctor-report PDF prints the report's own string with
a footnote naming the saved range. Entry side: one optional field on
the lab form, folded away until asked for, and the printed range is
editable on the scan review screen.
The range parser covers the notations German and English reports
actually print — two-sided, one-sided, comma or dot decimals, thousands
separators, trailing units — reads units without ever converting them,
and refuses to guess on anything ambiguous.
`moodEntrySchema` gains `note`, `noteEncrypted`, `tz`, `syncedAt`,
`syncVersion`, `createdAt`, `updatedAt` and `structuredTags`; every one of
them optional or defaulted, so a backup file written before this parses
unchanged and restores exactly as it did.
The restore writes them. The note follows the measurement pair: ciphertext
verbatim when the file carries it, a portable file's plaintext re-encrypted
on the way in, legacy column null either way. `tz` absent still means the
legacy Europe/Berlin reading, which is what those rows meant. `syncVersion`
comes back at the value the file recorded — restoring at the default handed
the next round to any paired device holding a higher number, and the device
would then overwrite the recovered entry with what it had.
The link rebuild re-creates both arms: rated factors from `factors`, ticked
tags from `structuredTags` with a NULL rating. An unresolvable tag key is
reported under its own `moodTag` family, beside the rated one, because an
operator needs to know which of the two an entry lost.
The contract already pointed at them: the Guardian roster names
`DELETE /api/managed-profiles/{id}/guardians/{grantId}` as the route its
`grantId` is for, and that route was not in the spec. Creation, deletion,
invitation and removal now are, with the two bodies moved to
`src/lib/validations` so the wire shape has one source.
Three things are stated rather than left to be discovered:
- the two refusals on the invitation that carry no `meta.errorCode`, and the
order a client must resolve in because of them
- the last-Guardian 409 on the removal route, which nothing can elicit through
that route today, published with the reason
- that the sentences on the ordinary invitation describe an invited grant only,
so a client cannot carry its MANAGE rules across to a Guardian grant
Two sentences promised that a manage grant reaches no settings at all. Both
were true when they were written and stopped being true when the anamnesis
destination opened, and both are in the worst places for a stale promise: one
is the access description generated into the public contract and read by the
native client, the other is the paragraph a delegate meets on a page sharing
does not cover.
Both now name the boundary the code draws — record content versus account
configuration — and say which part of the record a manage grant reaches. What
stays with the account owner is spelled out rather than implied: login, the
second factor, provider connections, tokens, notification routing, module and
threshold configuration, and who else has access.
A guard checks the copy against the classification rather than against itself,
so opening a second destination or closing this one moves the sentence with it.
The contract is regenerated.
- both record resolvers check the fence after authentication and before
the carrier, off the one session row that also decides the scope
- POST /api/account/switch takes an optional expectedEpoch and writes
conditionally, so concurrent switchers resolve to one outcome
- GET /api/auth/me publishes the context a browser bootstraps from
- every response that resolved a record scope echoes it back
- regenerate the API contract
An owner can now narrow a grant to the parts of their record they mean to
share, and can offer the third level. Both decisions are made once, on the
invitation, and neither widens afterwards.
The invite schema takes `scope`: absent or null is the entire record, which
is what every stored grant means and what an owner who does not narrow still
gets. An empty array, a key outside the vocabulary and the whole-record
sentinel are each refused with a 422 naming the field; `inviteGrant` refuses
the same three underneath, and its `invalid_scope` now has an HTTP mapping
instead of falling into the generic refusal.
Offering MANAGE asks for a fresh second factor when the account has one. That
gate resolves through the session cookie and has no Bearer fall-through, so a
token caller is refused first with `sharing.invite.manage_browser_only` rather
than being told it is not authenticated by a route that had just
authenticated it. The consequence is deliberate: management of a health
record is offered from a browser.
The account payload gains `sections` and `level` beside `access` and
`canWrite`, resolved server-side and ordered as the consent screen reads.
`access` was `grant.access === "WRITE" ? "write" : "read"`, which would have
published a grant that can delete entries as read-only; it is a total map
now, so the next level cannot ship silent. The capabilities hook carries both
facts and turns neither into an affordance yet — the edit and delete controls
come back in the release where the routes behind them answer.
The consent surface asks two questions in order rather than laying out a
nineteen-cell grid. The level is three radios, narrowest preselected. What
they can open is two radios, the entire record preselected, and only the
narrow branch expands the eight sections with a sentence each. Both honest
limits are stated above the checkboxes, where the decision is being made: a
section shares everything written in it, and the cross-record surfaces do not
appear for a narrowed grant. Documents carries its own warning, cycle appears
only for an owner who tracks it, and Manage collapses the question to the one
line that answers it.
The Manage sentence says the other person can add, change and remove entries,
including ones the owner entered themselves, and says in the same breath what
it does not reach. The acceptance side gets its own responsibility line rather
than the write one wearing a stronger adjective.
Six locales.
MedicationSideEffect was classified as backed up and was not carried: the
export wrote nothing and the restore had nothing to read, so a restored
account kept the drug and lost the reason someone may have stopped taking it.
Delegated write access sharpens that — a side effect is one of the things a
second person can contribute, and it was the contribution a restore dropped.
The rows ride inside their medication, like the schedules beside them. A
top-level array would have to carry `medicationId` and survive a restore that
mints a fresh id for a portable file, which is the remap the intake events
already work around by drug name; a nested create has no id to remap, because
Prisma binds the child to whatever id the parent row actually got.
The note follows the measurement contract for the same dual-column
arrangement: a portable export carries the decrypted note and no ciphertext, a
disaster-recovery payload carries the ciphertext verbatim, and the restore
re-encrypts a legacy plaintext row rather than writing plaintext back into the
column.
Move the model from COVERAGE_PENDING to TWO_ENDED_MODELS, and settle the claim
where a written verdict cannot: the round trip seeds a side effect, exports
through the real builder, empties the account and reads the row back out of
the real restore route with its category, entry, severity and note intact.
Both halves were excised to check the test can fail — the restore branch turns
the count red, the payload turns the field values red.
A grant has always had an access column and `inviteGrant` has always written
READ into it. That was the right way to ship the first version: "this release
never grants write" was a property of the file rather than a promise in a
comment. Remove it deliberately now, so somebody sharing their record can offer
reading or reading plus adding.
The level is a required argument to `inviteGrant` and is defaulted in exactly
one place, the invite schema, where an omitted field becomes READ. An older
client's payload therefore stays valid and stays narrow, and the domain module
never guesses a level nobody named.
There is no upgrade path and that is the decision, not a gap. A grant is READ
or WRITE from the moment it is offered and stays that way until somebody ends
it. Widening a live one would change what the delegate agreed to without asking
them again, and their consent is half of what makes a write grant legitimate.
The way up is a new invitation, accepted again.
The audit row and the wide event carry the level: "who was given what, and by
whom" is the question that row exists to answer.
The lifecycle surface under /api/account. An owner offers read access to
somebody already on the instance, the delegate accepts, either side ends
it, and a browser session points itself at a record it has been granted.
Ending a grant clears the acting-account carrier on every session of the
delegate pointing at that record, in the same transaction that stamps the
row. Split apart, a revocation would leave a browser inside a record it
can no longer read: every request refused, the banner still naming the
owner, nothing on screen able to explain it.
Revocation has no step-up and no confirmation step. Reducing access must
never be harder than granting it was.
Grant management is non-delegable by construction rather than by a check:
every route here resolves through bare requireAuth(), which refuses while
the caller is acting on another account, so no code path through them
runs as somebody else. The switch endpoint is the one actor surface, and
it is the way back out. A delegate already inside a record renounces
after switching out, one request, rather than the fail-closed default
growing an exception that later gets widened.
The state machine is not re-implemented anywhere: routes call the grant
module's predicate and its transitions, and the session carrier has one
writer.
A new user-scoped table is outside all three by default, and the two
structural guards said so the moment the model landed: the wipe plan and
the backup verdict list both named it as unclassified. It now joins the
wipe list, rides the backup payload as its own spread section, and comes
back through the restore route.
The classification guards only prove a helper exists in a declared file, so
they would pass an unreferenced restore helper. The integration round trip
goes through the real admin restore route instead, with the table emptied
first so a restore that carries nothing cannot pass by leaving what was
already there.
The admin panel offered a toggle for the Health-Score explainer and
described it as the ? next to the delta line. That ? had already been
taken off the insights surface a release earlier, and the caption that
replaced it went away entirely when the health score was replaced by
the reference composite. Since then an operator could turn the switch
off, get a saved confirmation, and change absolutely nothing.
The toggle, its wording in all six languages, its place in the flag
matrix the app and the iOS client both read, and its column on
app_settings are all gone. Nothing is left to promise a control that
does not exist.
A guard goes in with it: every remaining assistant sub-flag has to be
read by some surface, and the panel and the plumbing that carry all of
them by construction do not count as proof.
A cycle symptom can be recorded with a 1-4 intensity. The log-day sheet
writes it, the day-log reads it back, and the backup never carried it:
the file held the symptom keys and nothing else. Export a day recorded
as "cramps, and they were a 4", restore it, and you get "cramps". The
symptom is there, the number is gone, and nothing fails, which is why
nobody noticed.
The file now carries `symptomSeverities` alongside `symptomKeys` — one
entry per symptom that was actually rated. `symptomKeys` still decides
which symptoms a day had, so a release that only knows that field reads
every symptom out of a new file unchanged, and the two lists can never
disagree about presence. A link nobody rated is simply not listed: no
entry means never rated, which is not the same as rated zero.
A file written before this restores exactly as it did, with every
intensity absent rather than invented. An intensity outside 1-4, from a
hand-edited file or some later scale, costs that one number and leaves
the symptom and the rest of the restore alone.
GET /api/nutrients now looks up the most recent nutrient.batch.ingest
audit row when the window is genuinely empty, and surfaces it as
lastAttempt only when that call landed nothing (inserted === 0 &&
updated === 0). A real success elsewhere is left alone, so an empty
window for an unrelated reason never gets reframed as a failure.
The lookup runs on the zero-rows path only, never on the happy path,
and stays counts-and-reason-codes only - no user-typed content, no
per-entry health values. The reason code never reaches the page as
text: each of the four closed skip reasons maps to its own human
sentence, and the two that have no useful action for the account
holder (unit_mismatch, upsert_failed) say plainly that the entries
couldn't be stored rather than inventing advice. day_invalid is the
one case worth naming a real cause for - a clock or time zone mismatch
on the sending side - without claiming it was a phone, since any
token holder can call this route.
This depends on AuditLog retention: cleanupOldAuditLogs prunes rows
past 365 days by default, so a dormant account's last failed attempt
can age out and the explanation silently reverts to the plain empty
state. Documented at the lookup for whoever next touches that job.
- Normalize IPv6 literals before transition-prefix inspection
- Reject mapped, compatible, 6to4, and NAT64 private embeddings
- Share the verdict with pinned public and operator dispatchers
- cover mapped compatible 6to4 and NAT64 private embeddings
- exercise both literal URL and raw DNS address verdicts
- preserve public IPv4 native IPv6 and transition forms
Marc-André Bombeck