132 route handlers spelled out safeJson, safeParse and the 422 refusal by
hand in one of six shapes. Each block becomes one parseJsonBody call with
the same size cap, wide-event action, issue count, error code, message and
status it had, so every response is the one it was. The comments inside
the replaced refusal blocks go with them.
A ratchet (route-body-parse-ratchet) counts the route files that still call
safeJson themselves; the count may only fall.
lib/sharing/grants.ts held both the grant transitions and the predicates
every reader asks (state, level, scope, the live grant for a pair). The
transitions reach into the managed-profile lifecycle and the OAuth connect
target, and both of those read a live grant, so grants, lifecycle and
connect-target formed an import cycle.
The predicates, findActiveGrant and touchGrantUsage move verbatim to
lib/sharing/grant-access.ts, which imports only the database client and
the scope vocabulary. Importers and the mocks that replaced those
functions point at the new module. Runtime import cycles fall from 7 to 6.
- both record resolvers check the fence after authentication and before
the carrier, off the one session row that also decides the scope
- POST /api/account/switch takes an optional expectedEpoch and writes
conditionally, so concurrent switchers resolve to one outcome
- GET /api/auth/me publishes the context a browser bootstraps from
- every response that resolved a record scope echoes it back
- regenerate the API contract
The lifecycle surface under /api/account. An owner offers read access to
somebody already on the instance, the delegate accepts, either side ends
it, and a browser session points itself at a record it has been granted.
Ending a grant clears the acting-account carrier on every session of the
delegate pointing at that record, in the same transaction that stamps the
row. Split apart, a revocation would leave a browser inside a record it
can no longer read: every request refused, the banner still naming the
owner, nothing on screen able to explain it.
Revocation has no step-up and no confirmation step. Reducing access must
never be harder than granting it was.
Grant management is non-delegable by construction rather than by a check:
every route here resolves through bare requireAuth(), which refuses while
the caller is acting on another account, so no code path through them
runs as somebody else. The switch endpoint is the one actor surface, and
it is the way back out. A delegate already inside a record renounces
after switching out, one request, rather than the fail-closed default
growing an exception that later gets widened.
The state machine is not re-implemented anywhere: routes call the grant
module's predicate and its transitions, and the session carrier has one
writer.
Marc-André Bombeck