ensureDbCompatibility ran ALTER TABLE / CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS on the
login, register, token and session paths, mirroring columns every
migration under prisma/migrations already creates. The entrypoint applies
those migrations before the server listens and stops the boot when one
fails, so the mirror never had work to do, and DDL on a request path
needs the table's owner: a connection that may only read and write rows
fails every login on it. Drop the module, its call sites and the mocks
that stubbed it out.
The three routes that act on the whole of an account — `DELETE
/api/settings/data`, `DELETE /api/settings/account`, `POST
/api/export/encrypted` — name no record. They resolve the caller and act on
whatever the caller owns, so the question a switched session puts to them is
what happens when the browser believes it is somewhere else.
They already refuse: all three resolve through `requireFreshMfaIfEnrolled` or
its erasure sibling, and both open with `requireAuth()`, which reads the acting
carrier and throws `sharing.not_permitted` for anything but `none`. What was
missing is that the contract never said so. `/api/settings/{data,account}`
published a 403 about narrow Bearer scope alone, and the encrypted export
published no 403 at all, so a client that switches records had no way to learn
which of its calls stop working short of trying one.
One sentence, spliced onto the three, byte-identical for the same reason the
delegable refusal is one string. `switched-session-destructive-refusal.test.ts`
drives each route with a live whole-record MANAGE switch and asserts both
halves: the status, the code and the wording, and that neither record moved —
a refusal raised after the transaction would satisfy the first alone. The
export leg additionally asserts no archive rode along with the 403.
Marc-André Bombeck