`POST /api/mental-health/assessments` is fenced on `mind` and writes one row
into `measurements`: the instrument's total, minted `COMPUTED` and keyed on the
administration it came from, so the trend reads through the chart and rollup
tier without the encrypted item answers going anywhere. A grant scoped to mood
and mind therefore adds a point to the owner's measurement series, and nothing
said so.
Left in place rather than fenced. Withholding the projection the way the
booster mint is now fenced would file a screener whose own total is missing
from the record — an inconsistency inside the section the grant does open, to
avoid a derived point in one it does not. So it is documented instead, in the
three places it is decided or agreed to: the declaration, the section's own
definition, and the consent copy in all seven locales, which is where a
widening belongs. The published operation says it too.
- a query-key module and a dependent bundle that also evicts the
preventive-care root, because logging a dose settles a booster and the
checkups list goes stale in the same tick
- the OpenAPI module publishes the resolved series with the contract
written into the description: render text from these numbers, never
recompute them
- the health-background consent sentence now names the immunization
history in all six languages, so the widening is stated where it is
agreed to rather than inferred from a code comment
- no server-side cache helper: nothing cached reads a dose, and a sweep
over caches nobody reads would look like coverage without being it
Query keys land in the central factory before any surface reads them,
because the lint rule that bans a bare array means the first component
listing visits cannot compile without a slot. There is deliberately no
server-side cache invalidator beside them: nothing cached reads a visit
yet, and a sweep over caches nobody reads would look like coverage
without being any. The module says so at the place a reader would go
looking.
The OpenAPI table publishes seven paths with everything resolved — the
practitioner as an object rather than an id, each link with its label
and date, the appointment's next due instant computed. What it does not
publish is the reminder origin enum, which still reads with two members:
the third value exists in storage and reaches no response, because every
preventive-care read excludes it. Keeping that contract closed is why
the exclusion is worth a guard.
Classifying visits under the existing health-background domain widens
what that domain grants. Somebody who shared it so a relative could see
an allergy list now also shares every appointment and the address book.
That is stated where it is agreed to rather than left in a code comment:
the consent screen's sentence names visits and practices, in all six
locales, and the activity feed gains a verb line for each of the eight
new delegated actions so an owner reads what was done rather than
'made a change'.
A grant has meant one thing since it shipped: the whole record, to read or to
add to. This lays the words for the two shapes the rest of the sharing work
needs — part of a record, and management of one — while changing what no
existing grant does.
`ShareDomain` is a closed set of eight sections in `src/lib/sharing/scope.ts`,
clustered from the delegable read surfaces rather than invented, plus the
distinguished `record` for the routes that read across them. It never converts
to a `ModuleKey` and never imports one: two masks, two questions, no shared
spelling, because the day they share a name is the day somebody makes one
imply the other, and a module the owner enabled is not a section the owner
shared.
`account_grants.scope_json` is NULL on every row that exists, and NULL is the
entire record — the answer those rows were consented as, so no backfill and no
re-consent. A non-NULL value is read through one fail-closed normaliser: a
blob it cannot parse opens nothing, including a section the blob happened to
name. That is the deliberate inverse of the module preference normaliser,
which fails open on purpose; both do the safe thing with a value nobody can
read, and the safe thing differs because one answers an authorization question
and the other a presentation question.
`MANAGE` joins the level enum, ordered above WRITE so a write grant can never
satisfy it, and carries no scope at all: management of part of a record
promises a boundary that cannot survive an edit, so the invite path refuses to
write one.
`requireRecordAuth` takes the section as a second required argument. The
requirement is the lever — a delegable route without a classification does not
typecheck, so the set of classified routes cannot fall behind the set of
delegable ones. All fifty-seven modules carry theirs. The structural guard
freezes each against the production vocabulary, fails when a module's own arms
disagree, and pins a non-zero count of resolved sections so a matcher that
stopped reading the argument fails instead of agreeing with everything.
`requireGuardianAuth` is exported and reaches nothing yet. It gates on the
managed-profile marker rather than on the grant, so an adult who granted
management of their own record cannot arrive at that record's settings by any
argument about what MANAGE means: widening MANAGE would widen the record
resolver and would not touch this one. Its frozen list lands empty, with the
declaration site as the positive control that keeps "nothing reaches it" a
measurement rather than a renamed symbol.
`users.managed_profile_at` says since when a record is one somebody else runs.
A timestamp and not a boolean, for a reason the schema has to keep possible:
clearing it is the handover, and the grants and the activity trail span it
untouched.
Marc-André Bombeck