listPage (src/lib/http/list-query.ts) reads one row past the limit and
cuts it back, on top of the existing list-cap signal rather than beside
it. Every capped list now gets its page there, and every read passed to
it orders by something ending in the row id, so rows that share a sort
value cannot repeat or vanish at a page boundary.
- practitioners, vaccinations and encounters were cut at their take
with no signal; they now answer meta.truncated and accept offset, and
their web readers walk the pages instead of stopping at the first
- symptoms/events reported hasMore on a page that was exactly full; it
is now true only when a row past the page exists
- the document list's hand-rolled limit + 1 goes through the helper
- security-activity answers an out-of-range limit with the 422 its
published schema already promised instead of clamping it
list-page-guard binds every apiListSuccess route to listPage, forbids
hand-cut lists and length-derived hasMore, and requires the id
tiebreaker in every listPage read.
v1.43.6 shipped truncated as a required field of the activity
response's data, and moving it to meta alone would break a client
built against that in a patch release. data.truncated is back with the
same value as meta.truncated and is marked deprecated in the spec; the
web client keeps reading meta.
Twelve routes answer a capped list with meta.truncated / meta.limit on
the envelope, and the web client read only data, so no surface said a
list had stopped short. apiGetList / apiPostList are now the one client
reader of the cap and ListCapNotice the one line that shows it; every
capped list on the web reads its cap and shows the notice under the list,
the paged readers (side effects, illness episodes) stop on the route's
answer instead of a full-page guess, and the ECG list moves its five
readers onto one hook. The record activity feed sent its cap twice, in
data and on the envelope; it rides the envelope alone now. A guard
derives the capped routes from the tree and binds each to a client that
reads its cap.
A list that stops at its own take and says nothing lets the last row read
as the oldest there is. Capped lists now fetch one row past the limit and
answer meta.truncated and meta.limit on the success envelope, so data keeps
its shape. Applied to the capped lists without a total count: rhythm
events, ECG recordings, sharing grants and activity, illness episodes, side
effects, personal records, security activity, cycles, family history,
allergies and mental-health assessments. The activity feed no longer
reports a list that is exactly full as cut.
The revoke dialog tells an owner that "who entered what" stays answerable for
N days, and the activity list prints the same number under its heading. The
query behind that list had no date filter: on an instance whose retention was
shortened it showed rows the sentence said were already gone, and the number
was a caption over an unbounded read rather than its limit. It is the filter
now, resolved once so the bound and the sentence cannot drift apart.
The list also stopped at a hundred rows and said nothing about it, which is the
more dangerous of the two silences — an owner who scrolls to the bottom reads
the oldest visible line as the beginning, and a busy household reaches the cap
in a fraction of the window. The response says which of the two limits it hit,
and the view states it only when it did: a caveat that is always on is one
people learn to skip.
The self-hosting page said an empty list means nobody opened the record. It
means nobody did so within the window. Corrected, with the row cap named
alongside it.
Settings gains one section for one concept: who else can open this health
record, whose this account may open, and when they were opened. Split across
two pages it would be two half-answers.
An invitation confers nothing until the other person accepts it, and the card
says so above the field rather than after the submit — that is the part
somebody needs to know before they type a name. Refusals are named from the
stable errorCode, because "no account with that name" and "that person already
has access" are different situations with different next steps.
Ended grants stay in the list. The row is the consent record, and "who had
access, from when to when, and who ended it" is the question the panel exists
to answer; a list that dropped them could not. Revoking asks once and then does
it: reducing access must never be harder than granting it was.
`GET /api/account/activity` answers the owner's other question. One row per
person per day with a count, not one per request — a hundred identical lines
is a way of answering nothing. The window is published with the rows rather
than assumed: audit history is purged on a schedule the operator sets, so the
view prints the number the server resolved from the same setting the purge job
reads. An instance running ninety days says ninety.
Six locales ship with it.
Marc-André Bombeck