fix(auth): the ingest and idempotency Bearer resolvers refuse a pending account

Both resolve a Bearer token outside resolveBearerToken and checked only
revoked and expiry. The deletion revokes every token in its own transaction,
so only a token issued in that same instant could get through, but the rule
should hold everywhere a token is resolved: both now refuse an account
pending deletion.

src/app/api/ingest/medication/__tests__/route.test.ts

@@ -98,6 +98,7 @@ beforeEach(() => {
     revoked: false,
     expiresAt: null,
     lastUsedAt: null,
+    user: { deletionRequestedAt: null },
   } as never);
   vi.mocked(prisma.auditLog.create).mockResolvedValue({} as never);
 });
@@ -209,6 +210,7 @@ describe("POST /api/ingest/medication — slot attribution + convergence (v1.16.
       revoked: false,
       expiresAt: null,
       lastUsedAt: null,
+      user: { deletionRequestedAt: null },
     } as never);
     vi.mocked(prisma.apiToken.update).mockResolvedValue({} as never);
     vi.mocked(prisma.user.findUnique).mockResolvedValue({
@@ -373,6 +375,7 @@ describe("POST /api/ingest/medication — slot attribution + convergence (v1.16.
       revoked: false,
       expiresAt: null,
       lastUsedAt: null,
+      user: { deletionRequestedAt: null },
     } as Awaited<ReturnType<typeof prisma.apiToken.findUnique>>);
   }
 
@@ -536,6 +539,7 @@ describe("POST /api/ingest/medication — the rate-limit bucket", () => {
         revoked: false,
         expiresAt: null,
         lastUsedAt: null,
+        user: { deletionRequestedAt: null },
       } as never)
       .mockResolvedValueOnce({
         id: "tok-button",
@@ -544,6 +548,7 @@ describe("POST /api/ingest/medication — the rate-limit bucket", () => {
         revoked: false,
         expiresAt: null,
         lastUsedAt: null,
+        user: { deletionRequestedAt: null },
       } as never);
 
     await POST(postReq({ medicationName: "A", idempotencyKey: "k-aaaa-001" }));
@@ -600,6 +605,24 @@ describe("POST /api/ingest/medication — the rate-limit bucket", () => {
     expect(vi.mocked(checkRateLimit)).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
   });
 
+  // The deletion revokes every token in its own transaction; one issued in
+  // the same instant would slip past that, and is refused here as well.
+  it("refuses the token of an account pending deletion", async () => {
+    vi.mocked(prisma.apiToken.findUnique).mockResolvedValue({
+      id: "tok-1",
+      userId: "user-1",
+      permissions: ["*"],
+      revoked: false,
+      expiresAt: null,
+      lastUsedAt: null,
+      user: { deletionRequestedAt: new Date() },
+    } as never);
+    const res = await POST(
+      postReq({ medicationName: "Metformin", idempotencyKey: "k-pending-001" }),
+    );
+    expect(res.status).toBe(401);
+  });
+
   it("falls back to the per-IP bucket when the token does not resolve", async () => {
     vi.mocked(prisma.apiToken.findUnique).mockResolvedValue(null as never);
     const res = await POST(

src/app/api/ingest/medication/route.ts

@@ -103,10 +103,18 @@ export const POST = apiHandler(async (request: NextRequest) => {
       revoked: true,
       expiresAt: true,
       lastUsedAt: true,
+      user: { select: { deletionRequestedAt: true } },
     },
   });
 
-  if (!apiToken || apiToken.revoked) {
+  // A deletion revokes the account's tokens in its own transaction; a token
+  // issued in the same instant would slip past that, so the pending account
+  // is refused here too, as `resolveBearerToken` does.
+  if (
+    !apiToken ||
+    apiToken.revoked ||
+    apiToken.user.deletionRequestedAt !== null
+  ) {
     return refuseUnauthenticated(request, "Invalid or revoked token");
   }