Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into fix/private-notification-origins

# Conflicts:
#	src/app/api/settings/ntfy/route.ts
#	src/app/api/settings/webhook/route.ts
This commit is contained in:
Marc-André Bombeck committed 2026-09-10 18:07:55 +02:00
commit 71175290af
255 files changed
+12654 -1141

No files matched your search

+1273 -393
View File
File diff suppressed because it is too large. Load diff
+36
View File
@@ -215,6 +215,42 @@ A run where SOME account got a copy still succeeds, with the rest counted in
`offhost_backup_failed`. Failing the whole queue over one account's object
would re-upload everybody's on every retry.
### Which account has no copy
The counts above say how many accounts were uploaded, never which. An account
whose object has failed every night for a month reads as `99 uploaded, 1
failed` each time, which looks like weather.
**Admin console → Backups → Off-host copies** answers it per account: when this
host last put that account's encrypted copy in the bucket, how big it was, and
how that compares with the nightly schedule. **Fresh** is inside one run,
**due** means one run produced nothing for that account, **stale** means two
did not, **never** means a run walked the account and no object has ever
landed for it, and **no record yet** means no run has recorded the account at
all. On a host without `BACKUP_S3_*` the card says off-host backup is not
configured and stops there.
The ledger starts empty on the release that adds it, so on a host that has
been uploading nightly for months every account reads **no record yet** until
the first run after the upgrade. That is the ledger having no history, not the
bucket being empty — which is why it is a separate word from **never**, and
why the row says so rather than claiming nothing has ever reached the bucket.
Each verdict carries six hours of slack on top of the schedule's own 24, and
that slack is load-bearing on two nights. The cron runs at 02:30 Europe/Berlin,
so on the DST fall-back Sunday two consecutive runs are 25 hours apart; and the
timestamp is when _that account's_ object landed, so on a cohort walked one
account at a time an account reached later tonight than last night drifts by
hours. Without the slack a healthy host would paint its whole cohort **due**
once a year.
The verdicts come from a ledger the worker writes when the object lands
(`offhost_backup_state`), not from a listing of the bucket. Keep the worker's
grant as documented — PutObject, GetObject, AbortMultipartUpload — and the card
still tells the truth. A row that goes stale while the run reports success is
that account's object being refused, and the reason is in the run's
`offhost_backup_failures` meta.
## The weekly in-database backup (`data-backup`)
Separate from the off-host job above, and easy to confuse with it. A second
+21
View File
@@ -143,6 +143,27 @@ itself still works: it walks the journey against an in-process instance
once per leg with that leg broken, and fails if any of them comes back
green.
## Error reporting
HealthLog ships no default error-reporting target and never will: an
operator's crash reports must not leave their host because nobody told them
not to. Reporting starts only when someone types a DSN into **Admin →
Integrations → GlitchTip**, and that card states plainly whether reports are
going anywhere and which host they go to.
For a maintainer-operated instance, set the DSN there after the first deploy —
it lives in the database, not in the environment, so it survives an image
upgrade and does not need a compose change.
The badge on that card tracks delivery, not intent. A DSN that is set and
parses is not the same fact as reports arriving: a wrong public key, a wrong
project id and a host that stopped answering all parse. So the card is green
only while a report has actually left this host inside the last fortnight,
amber while a target is set and nothing has come back from it, and it names the
reason underneath when the last attempt was refused. Press **Test** to prove
the target on demand — that send is recorded like any other, so the badge
answers immediately.
## Verify the image signature
Every release image (the multi-arch manifest **index**, covering both
+42 -18
View File
@@ -49,16 +49,16 @@ Either the entire record, which is what sharing has always meant and what
every grant written before v1.37.0 carries, or a set of named sections
chosen when the invitation is written:
| Section | What it covers |
| ----------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| Readings | Weight, blood pressure, pulse, glucose, sleep, workouts and custom metrics |
| Medications | The medication list, its schedules, doses taken, side effects and stock |
| Lab results | Lab results and the analytes behind them |
| Health background | Allergies, family history and the facts in the health profile |
| Illness | Illness episodes and the day logs kept under them |
| Mood and mind | Mood entries and the mental-health questionnaire history |
| Cycle | Cycle tracking |
| Documents | Everything in the document vault |
| Section | What it covers |
| ----------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| Readings | Weight, blood pressure, pulse, glucose, sleep, workouts and custom metrics |
| Medications | The medication list, its schedules, doses taken, side effects and stock |
| Lab results | Lab results and the analytes behind them |
| Health background | Allergies, family history, the facts in the health profile, visits and the practices behind them, and the vaccination record |
| Illness | Illness episodes and the day logs kept under them |
| Mood and mind | Mood entries and the mental-health questionnaire history |
| Cycle | Cycle tracking |
| Documents | Everything in the document vault |
A section that was not shared is refused exactly the way a record nobody
shared is, so the shape of what was held back is not readable from
@@ -68,8 +68,12 @@ shared. The invitation screen says this in as many words, because a note
or a document name inside one section can be about any other.
Aggregate surfaces (the dashboard overview, the health score, the daily
digest) appear only on a whole-record grant. A figure derived from part of
a record reads as a figure about the person, and it would not be one.
digest, every insight) read across sections, so a grant naming sections
never opens one. A figure derived from part of a record reads as a figure
about the person, and it would not be one. Whole-record grants do not all
open them equally either: the daily digest and the dashboard's snapshot
answer at read, while the health score, the dashboard's summary and the
insights need manage.
A stored scope never grows. A section added by a later release is not in
a set somebody ticked before it existed.
@@ -80,11 +84,24 @@ Three levels, fixed when the invitation is written. Raising one means
revoking and inviting again, because widening a grant in place would carry
a consent the other person never gave.
| Level | Adds |
| ------ | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
| Read | Read what the grant opens, and change nothing. |
| Write | Add entries: a reading, a lab result, an analyte, an illness entry, a side effect, a medication, and marking a dose taken or skipped. Editing, deleting and restoring stay with you. |
| Manage | Change and remove entries, including ones the owner wrote; record the health background; read the insights generated from the record. Always the entire record. |
| Level | Adds |
| ------ | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| Read | Read what the grant opens, and change nothing. |
| Write | Add entries: a reading, a lab result, an analyte, an illness entry, a side effect, a medication, marking a dose taken or skipped, a visit, a practice, and a vaccination dose. Editing, deleting and restoring stay with you. |
| Manage | Change and remove entries, including ones the owner wrote; record the health background; read the insights generated from the record. Always the entire record. |
Some entries are creates only **manage** reaches, and the split runs by
entry rather than by section: an allergy, a family-history entry, a mood
entry, a screener, a cycle day, a water entry and a preventive-care
reminder are all created at manage, in sections a write grant can
otherwise add to. Nothing in the document vault is writable at any level.
One entry needs two sections rather than a higher level. Planning the
booster a vaccination suggests files it as a preventive-care reminder,
which lives under Readings, so a grant that opens Health background alone
logs the dose and is refused the booster. Logging the dose is unaffected
either way, and the app does not offer the booster to a grant that cannot
plan it.
Offering **manage** asks the owner for a fresh second factor if they have
one enrolled, which makes it a browser-only act either way: a Bearer
@@ -106,12 +123,19 @@ whole feature is built on, and it is drawn on the server:
| API tokens, the MCP connector | A durable credential that outlives the access |
| Connected services (Withings, Fitbit, WHOOP, Google Health, Polar, Oura, Strava, Nightscout) | Re-pointing a sync, or feeding somebody else's wearable into this record |
| Notification channels and push devices | The owner's health alerts redirected to another phone or chat |
| Exports, the health-record archive, clinician share links | A one-click copy of everything, or a new door that outlives the access |
| Full exports, the encrypted archive, clinician share links | A one-click copy of everything, or a new door that outlives the access |
| Asking an AI provider anything | AI processing of the owner's data, under the owner's own consent |
| Modules, thresholds, units, the record's language and timezone | Configuration of the account, not content of the record |
| Sharing itself | Inviting somebody else, widening the access, or passing it on |
| Locale, theme, dashboard layout | Presentation belongs to the person, not to the record |
One export is the exception, and it is deliberate: the doctor report
(`POST /api/export/health-record`) answers at manage on a whole-record
grant. It renders a prepared artefact from a selection the caller declares
rather than handing the record over whole, which is the difference the row
above is drawing. The full exports and the passphrase-encrypted archive
stay with the owner.
This table is about a grant between two accounts. A managed profile is
the one place where some of it is deliberately different, because a record
with no login has nobody else to keep its own configuration: see "Records