Gate the FHIR REST face on the doctorReport module

/api/fhir/* serves the same whole-record aggregate as
/api/export/health-record -- right down to the decrypted insurance number
on the Patient resource -- but never consulted the module gate. The
export refuses with a 403 module.disabled envelope when the account turns
the doctor-report module off; the FHIR face happily returned the full
Bundle to the same token.

Gate all five data routes (Patient, Observation, MedicationStatement,
MedicationAdministration, $everything). Refuse rather than omit: a
whole-record export has no truthful partial answer, and unlike the sync
delta feed no background client depends on it draining to stay
consistent. The refusal reuses the shared module.disabled envelope so the
errorCode clients already branch on stays the same.

loadFhirContext gains a fail-closed assertion as a second layer. It is
the one door to the aggregate, so it refuses outright instead of trusting
that every future caller remembers its gate; reaching it means a route is
missing one, which is a bug to surface rather than a flow to serve.

The static CapabilityStatement at /api/fhir/metadata stays open -- server
metadata, no user data.

src/app/api/fhir/$everything/route.ts

@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
 import { NextRequest } from "next/server";
 
 import { apiHandler, requireAuth } from "@/lib/api-handler";
+import { requireModuleEnabled } from "@/lib/modules/gate";
 import { annotate } from "@/lib/logging/context";
 import { checkRateLimit } from "@/lib/rate-limit";
 import {
@@ -32,6 +33,21 @@ export const GET = apiHandler(async (request: NextRequest) => {
   const { user } = await requireAuth(FHIR_READ_SCOPE);
   annotate({ action: { name: "fhir.everything.read" } });
 
+  // v1.30 — the FHIR REST face serves the SAME whole-record aggregate as
+  // `/api/export/health-record` (the doctor-report builder), right down to
+  // the decrypted insurance number on the Patient resource. That export
+  // gates on the `doctorReport` module; this surface did not, so the module
+  // could be off and `/api/fhir/*` still handed out the full record.
+  //
+  // REFUSE, NOT OMIT — deliberately, and unlike the sync delta feed. This is
+  // a whole-record export, not an incremental feed: there is no partial
+  // answer that is still a truthful FHIR Bundle, and no background client
+  // depends on it draining to stay consistent. Mirroring the sibling export's
+  // 403 `module.disabled` envelope (rather than an OperationOutcome) keeps
+  // the errorCode the clients already branch on for a disabled module.
+  const gate = await requireModuleEnabled(user.id, "doctorReport");
+  if (!gate.enabled) return gate.response;
+
   const rl = await checkRateLimit(`fhir:${user.id}`, 120, 60 * 60 * 1000);
   if (!rl.allowed) {
     return operationOutcome(429, "throttled", "Rate limit exceeded");

src/app/api/fhir/MedicationAdministration/route.ts

@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
 import { NextRequest } from "next/server";
 
 import { apiHandler, requireAuth } from "@/lib/api-handler";
+import { requireModuleEnabled } from "@/lib/modules/gate";
 import { annotate } from "@/lib/logging/context";
 import { checkRateLimit } from "@/lib/rate-limit";
 import { medicationAdministrationsFromReportData } from "@/lib/fhir/resources";
@@ -24,6 +25,21 @@ export const GET = apiHandler(async (request: NextRequest) => {
   const { user } = await requireAuth(FHIR_READ_SCOPE);
   annotate({ action: { name: "fhir.medicationadministration.search" } });
 
+  // v1.30 — the FHIR REST face serves the SAME whole-record aggregate as
+  // `/api/export/health-record` (the doctor-report builder), right down to
+  // the decrypted insurance number on the Patient resource. That export
+  // gates on the `doctorReport` module; this surface did not, so the module
+  // could be off and `/api/fhir/*` still handed out the full record.
+  //
+  // REFUSE, NOT OMIT — deliberately, and unlike the sync delta feed. This is
+  // a whole-record export, not an incremental feed: there is no partial
+  // answer that is still a truthful FHIR Bundle, and no background client
+  // depends on it draining to stay consistent. Mirroring the sibling export's
+  // 403 `module.disabled` envelope (rather than an OperationOutcome) keeps
+  // the errorCode the clients already branch on for a disabled module.
+  const gate = await requireModuleEnabled(user.id, "doctorReport");
+  if (!gate.enabled) return gate.response;
+
   const rl = await checkRateLimit(`fhir:${user.id}`, 120, 60 * 60 * 1000);
   if (!rl.allowed) {
     return operationOutcome(429, "throttled", "Rate limit exceeded");

src/app/api/fhir/MedicationStatement/route.ts

@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
 import { NextRequest } from "next/server";
 
 import { apiHandler, requireAuth } from "@/lib/api-handler";
+import { requireModuleEnabled } from "@/lib/modules/gate";
 import { annotate } from "@/lib/logging/context";
 import { checkRateLimit } from "@/lib/rate-limit";
 import { medicationStatementsFromReportData } from "@/lib/fhir/resources";
@@ -25,6 +26,21 @@ export const GET = apiHandler(async (request: NextRequest) => {
   const { user } = await requireAuth(FHIR_READ_SCOPE);
   annotate({ action: { name: "fhir.medicationstatement.search" } });
 
+  // v1.30 — the FHIR REST face serves the SAME whole-record aggregate as
+  // `/api/export/health-record` (the doctor-report builder), right down to
+  // the decrypted insurance number on the Patient resource. That export
+  // gates on the `doctorReport` module; this surface did not, so the module
+  // could be off and `/api/fhir/*` still handed out the full record.
+  //
+  // REFUSE, NOT OMIT — deliberately, and unlike the sync delta feed. This is
+  // a whole-record export, not an incremental feed: there is no partial
+  // answer that is still a truthful FHIR Bundle, and no background client
+  // depends on it draining to stay consistent. Mirroring the sibling export's
+  // 403 `module.disabled` envelope (rather than an OperationOutcome) keeps
+  // the errorCode the clients already branch on for a disabled module.
+  const gate = await requireModuleEnabled(user.id, "doctorReport");
+  if (!gate.enabled) return gate.response;
+
   const rl = await checkRateLimit(`fhir:${user.id}`, 120, 60 * 60 * 1000);
   if (!rl.allowed) {
     return operationOutcome(429, "throttled", "Rate limit exceeded");

src/app/api/fhir/Observation/route.ts

@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
 import { NextRequest } from "next/server";
 
 import { apiHandler, requireAuth } from "@/lib/api-handler";
+import { requireModuleEnabled } from "@/lib/modules/gate";
 import { annotate } from "@/lib/logging/context";
 import { checkRateLimit } from "@/lib/rate-limit";
 import { observationsFromReportData } from "@/lib/fhir/resources";
@@ -25,6 +26,21 @@ export const GET = apiHandler(async (request: NextRequest) => {
   const { user } = await requireAuth(FHIR_READ_SCOPE);
   annotate({ action: { name: "fhir.observation.search" } });
 
+  // v1.30 — the FHIR REST face serves the SAME whole-record aggregate as
+  // `/api/export/health-record` (the doctor-report builder), right down to
+  // the decrypted insurance number on the Patient resource. That export
+  // gates on the `doctorReport` module; this surface did not, so the module
+  // could be off and `/api/fhir/*` still handed out the full record.
+  //
+  // REFUSE, NOT OMIT — deliberately, and unlike the sync delta feed. This is
+  // a whole-record export, not an incremental feed: there is no partial
+  // answer that is still a truthful FHIR Bundle, and no background client
+  // depends on it draining to stay consistent. Mirroring the sibling export's
+  // 403 `module.disabled` envelope (rather than an OperationOutcome) keeps
+  // the errorCode the clients already branch on for a disabled module.
+  const gate = await requireModuleEnabled(user.id, "doctorReport");
+  if (!gate.enabled) return gate.response;
+
   const rl = await checkRateLimit(`fhir:${user.id}`, 120, 60 * 60 * 1000);
   if (!rl.allowed) {
     return operationOutcome(429, "throttled", "Rate limit exceeded");

src/app/api/fhir/Patient/route.ts

@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
 import { NextRequest } from "next/server";
 
 import { apiHandler, requireAuth } from "@/lib/api-handler";
+import { requireModuleEnabled } from "@/lib/modules/gate";
 import { annotate } from "@/lib/logging/context";
 import { checkRateLimit } from "@/lib/rate-limit";
 import { patientResource } from "@/lib/fhir/resources";
@@ -24,6 +25,21 @@ export const GET = apiHandler(async (request: NextRequest) => {
   const { user } = await requireAuth(FHIR_READ_SCOPE);
   annotate({ action: { name: "fhir.patient.search" } });
 
+  // v1.30 — the FHIR REST face serves the SAME whole-record aggregate as
+  // `/api/export/health-record` (the doctor-report builder), right down to
+  // the decrypted insurance number on the Patient resource. That export
+  // gates on the `doctorReport` module; this surface did not, so the module
+  // could be off and `/api/fhir/*` still handed out the full record.
+  //
+  // REFUSE, NOT OMIT — deliberately, and unlike the sync delta feed. This is
+  // a whole-record export, not an incremental feed: there is no partial
+  // answer that is still a truthful FHIR Bundle, and no background client
+  // depends on it draining to stay consistent. Mirroring the sibling export's
+  // 403 `module.disabled` envelope (rather than an OperationOutcome) keeps
+  // the errorCode the clients already branch on for a disabled module.
+  const gate = await requireModuleEnabled(user.id, "doctorReport");
+  if (!gate.enabled) return gate.response;
+
   const rl = await checkRateLimit(`fhir:${user.id}`, 120, 60 * 60 * 1000);
   if (!rl.allowed) {
     return operationOutcome(429, "throttled", "Rate limit exceeded");

src/app/api/fhir/__tests__/module-gate.test.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,179 @@
+/**
+ * `/api/fhir/*` — doctorReport module gate.
+ *
+ * The FHIR REST face serves the same whole-record aggregate as
+ * `/api/export/health-record`, including the decrypted insurance number on
+ * the Patient resource. The export gates on the `doctorReport` module; the
+ * FHIR routes did not, so the module could be off and `$everything` still
+ * returned the full Bundle to the same token.
+ *
+ * REFUSE, not omit — a whole-record export has no truthful partial answer.
+ * Every data route 403s with the shared `module.disabled` envelope; only the
+ * static CapabilityStatement at `/api/fhir/metadata` stays open (server
+ * metadata, no user data).
+ *
+ * Behavioural: the assertions read status codes and check that no aggregate
+ * was ever loaded, so removing a gate turns them red.
+ */
+import { describe, it, expect, vi, beforeEach } from "vitest";
+import { NextRequest } from "next/server";
+
+vi.mock("@/lib/auth/session", () => ({ getSession: vi.fn() }));
+vi.mock("@/lib/rate-limit", () => ({ checkRateLimit: vi.fn() }));
+vi.mock("@/lib/logging/transports", () => ({ emitIfSampled: vi.fn() }));
+vi.mock("@/lib/db-compat", () => ({
+  ensureDbCompatibility: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue(undefined),
+}));
+// The module gate itself is NOT mocked — the whole point is to exercise the
+// real resolver and the real 403 envelope. Only its data sources are stubbed,
+// so the module state is driven the same way production drives it: through
+// the persisted `modulePreferencesJson` allowlist.
+vi.mock("@/lib/db", () => ({
+  prisma: {
+    user: { findUnique: vi.fn() },
+    cycleProfile: { findUnique: vi.fn() },
+  },
+}));
+vi.mock("@/lib/modules/operator-availability", async (importOriginal) => {
+  const actual =
+    await importOriginal<
+      typeof import("@/lib/modules/operator-availability")
+    >();
+  return { ...actual, getOperatorModuleAvailability: vi.fn() };
+});
+vi.mock("@/lib/fhir/rest", async (importOriginal) => {
+  const actual = await importOriginal<typeof import("@/lib/fhir/rest")>();
+  return { ...actual, loadFhirContext: vi.fn() };
+});
+vi.mock("@/lib/fhir/resources", () => ({
+  GERMAN_ATC_DEFAULT_LOCALES: ["de"],
+  patientResource: vi.fn(() => ({ resourceType: "Patient", id: "p-1" })),
+  coverageResource: vi.fn(() => null),
+  observationsFromReportData: vi.fn(() => []),
+  medicationStatementsFromReportData: vi.fn(() => []),
+  medicationAdministrationsFromReportData: vi.fn(() => []),
+}));
+vi.mock("next/headers", () => ({
+  headers: vi.fn(async () => ({ get: () => null })),
+  cookies: vi.fn(async () => ({
+    get: () => undefined,
+    set: () => {},
+    delete: () => {},
+  })),
+}));
+
+import { GET as patientGet } from "../Patient/route";
+import { GET as observationGet } from "../Observation/route";
+import { GET as medStatementGet } from "../MedicationStatement/route";
+import { GET as medAdminGet } from "../MedicationAdministration/route";
+import { GET as everythingGet } from "../$everything/route";
+import { GET as metadataGet } from "../metadata/route";
+
+import { getSession } from "@/lib/auth/session";
+import { checkRateLimit } from "@/lib/rate-limit";
+import { MODULE_DISABLED_ERROR_CODE, MODULE_KEYS } from "@/lib/modules/gate";
+import { getOperatorModuleAvailability } from "@/lib/modules/operator-availability";
+import { loadFhirContext } from "@/lib/fhir/rest";
+import { prisma } from "@/lib/db";
+
+/**
+ * Drive the REAL gate the way production does — through the persisted
+ * `modulePreferencesJson` disabled-allowlist, where only a literal `false`
+ * turns a module off.
+ */
+function setDoctorReportModule(enabled: boolean): void {
+  vi.mocked(prisma.user.findUnique).mockResolvedValue({
+    gender: null,
+    disableCoach: false,
+    modulePreferencesJson: enabled ? {} : { doctorReport: false },
+  } as never);
+  vi.mocked(prisma.cycleProfile.findUnique).mockResolvedValue(null as never);
+}
+
+const SESSION_OK = {
+  session: { id: "sess-1", expiresAt: new Date(Date.now() + 3_600_000) },
+  user: { id: "user-1", username: "tester", role: "USER" as const },
+};
+
+/** Every data route under `/api/fhir`, by the path a caller would hit. */
+const DATA_ROUTES: ReadonlyArray<
+  [string, (req: NextRequest) => Promise<Response>]
+> = [
+  ["Patient", patientGet],
+  ["Observation", observationGet],
+  ["MedicationStatement", medStatementGet],
+  ["MedicationAdministration", medAdminGet],
+  ["$everything", everythingGet],
+];
+
+function req(path: string): NextRequest {
+  return new NextRequest(`http://localhost/api/fhir/${path}`);
+}
+
+beforeEach(() => {
+  vi.resetAllMocks();
+  vi.mocked(getSession).mockResolvedValue(SESSION_OK as never);
+  vi.mocked(checkRateLimit).mockResolvedValue({
+    allowed: true,
+    count: 1,
+    resetAt: Date.now(),
+  } as never);
+  // Operator layer available for every module; the per-user layer is what
+  // each test drives.
+  vi.mocked(getOperatorModuleAvailability).mockResolvedValue(
+    Object.fromEntries(MODULE_KEYS.map((k) => [k, true])) as never,
+  );
+  vi.mocked(loadFhirContext).mockResolvedValue({
+    data: {} as never,
+    identity: { insuranceNumber: "A123456789" },
+    germanAtc: false,
+  });
+});
+
+describe("/api/fhir/* — doctorReport module gate", () => {
+  describe.each(DATA_ROUTES)("GET /api/fhir/%s", (path, handler) => {
+    it("403s with module.disabled when the module is off", async () => {
+      setDoctorReportModule(false);
+
+      const res = await handler(req(path));
+      expect(res.status).toBe(403);
+
+      const body = (await res.json()) as {
+        data: unknown;
+        error: string;
+        meta?: { errorCode?: string; module?: string };
+      };
+      expect(body.data).toBeNull();
+      expect(body.meta?.errorCode).toBe(MODULE_DISABLED_ERROR_CODE);
+      expect(body.meta?.module).toBe("doctorReport");
+
+      // Refused before any record was assembled — the insurance number
+      // never left the store.
+      expect(loadFhirContext).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+      expect(JSON.stringify(body)).not.toContain("A123456789");
+    });
+
+    it("serves the Bundle when the module is on", async () => {
+      setDoctorReportModule(true);
+
+      const res = await handler(req(path));
+      expect(res.status).toBe(200);
+      expect(res.headers.get("content-type")).toContain(
+        "application/fhir+json",
+      );
+
+      const bundle = (await res.json()) as { resourceType: string };
+      expect(bundle.resourceType).toBe("Bundle");
+      expect(loadFhirContext).toHaveBeenCalledWith("user-1");
+    });
+  });
+
+  it("leaves the static CapabilityStatement reachable while the module is off", async () => {
+    // Server metadata, no user data — the one FHIR route that stays open.
+    setDoctorReportModule(false);
+    const res = await metadataGet();
+    expect(res.status).toBe(200);
+    const body = (await res.json()) as { resourceType: string };
+    expect(body.resourceType).toBe("CapabilityStatement");
+  });
+});

src/app/api/fhir/__tests__/route.test.ts

@@ -16,6 +16,10 @@ vi.mock("@/lib/logging/transports", () => ({ emitIfSampled: vi.fn() }));
 vi.mock("@/lib/db-compat", () => ({
   ensureDbCompatibility: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue(undefined),
 }));
+vi.mock("@/lib/modules/gate", () => ({
+  requireModuleEnabled: vi.fn(),
+  isModuleEnabled: vi.fn(),
+}));
 vi.mock("@/lib/fhir/rest", async (importOriginal) => {
   const actual = await importOriginal<typeof import("@/lib/fhir/rest")>();
   return { ...actual, loadFhirContext: vi.fn() };
@@ -36,6 +40,7 @@ import { GET as observationGet } from "../Observation/route";
 import { getSession } from "@/lib/auth/session";
 import { checkRateLimit } from "@/lib/rate-limit";
 import { loadFhirContext, MAX_COUNT } from "@/lib/fhir/rest";
+import { requireModuleEnabled, isModuleEnabled } from "@/lib/modules/gate";
 import { observationsFromReportData } from "@/lib/fhir/resources";
 
 const SESSION_OK = {
@@ -65,6 +70,10 @@ beforeEach(() => {
     count: 1,
     resetAt: Date.now(),
   } as never);
+  // The doctorReport module is ON for the contract assertions below; the
+  // OFF behaviour is pinned in `module-gate.test.ts`.
+  vi.mocked(requireModuleEnabled).mockResolvedValue({ enabled: true });
+  vi.mocked(isModuleEnabled).mockResolvedValue(true);
   vi.mocked(loadFhirContext).mockResolvedValue({
     data: {} as never,
     identity: { insuranceNumber: null },